Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeSelection criteria examples are useful only when they show how evidence is built, not when they give you polished phrases to copy. In Australia, selection criteria responses are usually assessed against the job requirements, capability framework, position description, and the strength of your demonstrated examples. A good response proves three things clearly: you understand the criterion, you have done the work before, and your actions led to a useful result. The mistake I see constantly is candidates describing themselves instead of proving themselves. “I have excellent communication skills” tells me nothing. A specific example showing who you communicated with, what was at stake, what you did, and what changed afterwards is what gets attention.
Selection criteria are the employer’s way of saying, “Before we interview you, show us evidence that you can do the important parts of this job.”
That sounds simple, but candidates often misread them. They treat selection criteria like a personality quiz or a formal writing exercise. They write things like:
Weak Example
“I am a motivated team player with excellent stakeholder management skills and strong attention to detail.”
That may sound professional, but from a recruiter’s side, it is empty. It gives me no workplace context, no decision making, no pressure, no result, and no reason to believe the candidate can perform the role.
Selection criteria are not asking whether you own the skill. They are asking whether you can demonstrate the skill in a work relevant situation.
In Australian hiring, especially for government, education, health, universities, councils, community services, and large organisations, selection criteria help panels compare candidates more fairly. The panel may need to justify why one applicant was shortlisted and another was not. That means your answer has to give them something concrete to assess.
The strongest responses usually answer these silent questions:
What was the situation?
What was your responsibility?
What specific action did you take?
Most people search for selection criteria examples because they are not sure what “good” looks like. Fair. The language in Australian job ads can be painfully formal. “Demonstrated ability to liaise with stakeholders” sounds like something written by a committee after three coffees and a policy document.
Here is what employers usually mean in plain English.
When they ask for demonstrated communication skills, they want evidence that you can explain information clearly, adapt your message, handle difficult conversations, and reduce confusion.
When they ask for stakeholder engagement, they want to know whether you can work with people who have different priorities without becoming vague, passive, or difficult.
When they ask for problem solving, they want to see how you think when things are unclear, messy, delayed, or not going to plan.
When they ask for attention to detail, they want proof that your accuracy protects the organisation from mistakes, complaints, rework, compliance issues, or poor service.
When they ask for teamwork, they are not asking whether you are friendly. They want to know whether you contribute, communicate, follow through, and handle shared responsibility without creating extra work for everyone else.
Good selection criteria examples help you see the difference between claiming a skill and proving a capability.
What judgement did you use?
What changed because of your work?
How does this example prove you can do the advertised role?
That last question matters more than people realise. A technically good example can still fail if it does not connect clearly to the job.
The STAR method is still one of the clearest ways to write selection criteria responses because it stops you from rambling. STAR stands for Situation, Task, Action, and Result.
The problem is that many candidates use STAR badly. They spend half the response setting the scene, then rush through the action in one vague sentence. That is backwards.
The most important part is the Action. That is where the panel sees your judgement, skill level, ownership, and relevance.
A strong structure looks like this:
Situation: Briefly explain the context
Task: Clarify your responsibility or objective
Action: Explain exactly what you did and why
Result: Show the outcome, improvement, feedback, or measurable impact
Here is the recruiter reality: assessors are not impressed by dramatic situations if your personal contribution is unclear. A big project does not automatically make you a strong candidate. Your part in the project matters.
A better response sounds specific and controlled:
Good Example
“In my role as an administration officer at a community health clinic, I noticed that referral documents were often missing key information, which delayed appointments and created extra follow up for clinicians. I reviewed the most common errors, created a referral checklist, and spoke with the intake team about where the process was breaking down. I then updated the shared email template so external providers knew exactly what to include. Within two months, incomplete referrals reduced noticeably, clinicians spent less time chasing information, and patients were booked more quickly.”
This works because it shows the candidate noticed a problem, took practical action, involved the right people, and improved an outcome.
Criterion: Demonstrated ability to communicate clearly and effectively with internal and external stakeholders.
Weak Example
“I have excellent communication skills and can communicate with people at all levels. I am confident speaking with customers, managers and team members, and I always make sure my communication is professional.”
This is the kind of answer that sounds fine until you realise it proves almost nothing. Everyone says they communicate professionally. The panel needs an example.
Good Example
“In my role as a customer service officer for a local council, I regularly handled enquiries from residents about delayed permit applications. One resident became frustrated because they had received conflicting information from different departments. I reviewed the case notes, contacted the planning team to confirm the correct status, and then called the resident back with a clear explanation of what had happened, what was still required, and when they could expect the next update. I also documented the conversation in the system so the next staff member had the full context. The resident was calmer after the call, the matter did not escalate to a complaint, and the planning team used my notes to resolve the application more quickly.”
This response is stronger because it shows communication under pressure. It also proves the candidate can translate internal information into something useful for the customer. That is the part employers care about. Communication is not just talking nicely. It is reducing confusion.
Criterion: Ability to work effectively as part of a team and contribute to shared outcomes.
Weak Example
“I enjoy working in a team and get along well with others. I am supportive, reliable and always willing to help my colleagues when needed.”
Again, pleasant but thin. It tells me the candidate sees teamwork as being agreeable. In hiring, teamwork is more than being liked. It is about contribution, reliability, communication, and shared accountability.
Good Example
“In my previous role as a project assistant, our team had to prepare reporting documents for a funding submission with a tight deadline. I noticed that different team members were saving files in different folders, which created confusion and duplicated work. I suggested a simple shared tracker, listed each section of the submission, and clarified who was responsible for each update. I also checked in with team members who were waiting on data from other departments and helped follow up where needed. As a result, the team completed the submission on time, avoided duplicate reporting, and had a clearer process for the next funding round.”
This is a good teamwork example because the candidate does not just say they helped. They show how they improved coordination. Hiring managers notice that because every workplace has coordination problems. The useful people are the ones who make the work easier, not noisier.
Criterion: Demonstrated problem solving skills and ability to use initiative.
Weak Example
“I am a strong problem solver and can think outside the box. I use initiative when issues arise and always try to find the best solution.”
This is generic job application wallpaper. It sounds busy, but there is no evidence.
Good Example
“While working as a rostering coordinator in an aged care service, I noticed a pattern of last minute shift gaps on weekends. Staff were often being contacted urgently, which caused stress and increased the risk of uncovered shifts. I reviewed the previous three months of roster changes and found that several gaps were linked to the same availability issues. I raised this with the team leader and suggested we collect updated weekend availability from casual staff before finalising the next roster cycle. I created a simple availability form, updated the roster notes, and identified staff who preferred weekend shifts. This reduced urgent weekend calls and gave the team more reliable coverage.”
This example works because it shows practical problem solving. Not a heroic rescue. Not a vague “I fixed the issue.” Just a real workplace problem, analysed properly, solved sensibly.
That is often what hiring managers want. They are not always looking for someone who reinvents the whole organisation. They want someone who notices patterns, takes ownership, and improves the work.
Criterion: High level attention to detail and accuracy in managing information.
Weak Example
“I have excellent attention to detail and always check my work before submitting it. I understand the importance of accuracy and take pride in producing high quality work.”
This is one of the most overused selection criteria answers. It is not wrong, but it is too easy to say. A better answer shows what your attention to detail prevented or improved.
Good Example
“In my role as an accounts administrator, I was responsible for entering supplier invoices into the finance system. During a routine check, I noticed that several invoices from one supplier had inconsistent purchase order numbers. Rather than processing them immediately, I compared the invoices against the purchase order register and found that two invoices had been coded to the wrong cost centre. I contacted the supplier for clarification, updated the internal records, and notified my manager before payment approval. This prevented incorrect cost allocation and helped the finance team reconcile the monthly accounts without further rework.”
This is stronger because it links accuracy to business impact. Attention to detail is not about being fussy. It is about protecting the organisation from errors, delays, incorrect payments, compliance problems, and avoidable mess.
Criterion: Demonstrated leadership skills and ability to support team performance.
Leadership criteria can be tricky because many candidates assume they need a formal management title. You do not always need one. You need evidence that you influenced outcomes, supported others, made decisions, or took responsibility.
Weak Example
“I am a natural leader and have strong leadership skills. I lead by example and motivate others to do their best.”
This sounds like a leadership poster in a meeting room. It needs evidence.
Good Example
“As a senior support worker in a disability services team, I supported several newer staff members who were learning client documentation requirements. I noticed that incident notes varied in quality, which made it difficult for coordinators to understand what had happened during shifts. I created a short example guide showing what strong notes should include, such as objective observations, times, actions taken, and follow up required. I walked two newer team members through the guide during quiet periods and encouraged them to ask questions before submitting complex notes. Over the next month, documentation became clearer, coordinators asked for fewer corrections, and newer staff became more confident completing records independently.”
This works because it shows leadership as practical support. Not ego. Not vague motivation. Actual capability building.
In real hiring, leadership is often assessed through your ability to create clarity, improve standards, and help others perform better. A title helps, but evidence matters more.
Criterion: Demonstrated ability to build productive relationships with stakeholders.
Stakeholder engagement is one of those phrases that sounds more complicated than it is. In practice, it means you can work with people who need different things from you, sometimes with competing priorities, and still move the work forward.
Weak Example
“I have experience engaging with stakeholders and building strong relationships. I am professional, approachable and able to work with a wide range of people.”
This is too broad. The missing piece is complexity. Who were the stakeholders? What did they need? What made the relationship important?
Good Example
“In my role as a program officer for a not for profit organisation, I worked with community partners, internal case workers and local schools to coordinate youth workshops. Early in the program, attendance was lower than expected because schools needed more notice and community partners were unclear about referral expectations. I organised a short planning meeting with each stakeholder group, clarified what information they needed, and created a shared schedule with referral cut off dates. I also sent concise fortnightly updates so everyone had the same information. Attendance improved across the next workshop cycle, and partners reported that the process was easier to explain to families.”
This is strong because it shows the candidate understands stakeholder engagement is not just relationship building. It is expectation management. That is the bit many candidates miss.
Criterion: Ability to manage competing priorities and work effectively under pressure.
Employers ask this because most roles contain some level of pressure. What they want to know is whether you become chaotic, defensive, silent, or organised when priorities collide.
Weak Example
“I work well under pressure and can manage multiple tasks at once. I stay calm and make sure deadlines are met.”
This is not enough. The panel needs to see how you prioritise.
Good Example
“While working as an executive assistant, I supported two senior managers during a week when both had urgent board papers due, several meeting changes, and competing travel requirements. I reviewed all deadlines first, identified which tasks affected other people’s work, and confirmed priorities with both managers. I updated the calendar, prepared the board paper attachments in order of deadline, and flagged one non urgent task that could be moved to the following week. I also kept a running list of completed and pending items so nothing was missed. Both board papers were submitted on time, travel was confirmed correctly, and the managers had a clearer view of what needed their attention.”
This example shows the candidate did not just “stay calm.” They created order. In hiring, that is what matters. Calm is nice. Prioritisation is useful.
This is the part candidates often find frustrating. You can be capable and still write a weak application.
A poor selection criteria response does not always mean the person cannot do the job. Sometimes it means they have not translated their experience into assessable evidence.
Common failure patterns include:
Writing broad claims instead of specific examples
Using “we” so often that the candidate’s own contribution disappears
Spending too much space explaining the organisation and not enough explaining the action
Choosing examples that are too old, too junior, or not relevant enough
Giving a result that says “the outcome was successful” without explaining what success looked like
Ignoring the language of the criterion
Copying the same example across multiple criteria without adjusting the focus
Writing like they are trying to sound professional instead of trying to be clear
One of the biggest mistakes is using inflated language to cover a thin example. Recruiters notice. Panels notice. If the example is weak, bigger words do not save it. They usually make it worse.
A strong response does not need to sound fancy. It needs to sound credible.
The best example is not always the biggest example. It is the one that gives the clearest evidence for the criterion.
Before choosing an example, ask yourself:
Does this example directly prove the skill being requested?
Was my personal contribution clear?
Did I make a decision, solve a problem, improve something, or influence an outcome?
Can I explain the result without being vague?
Is the example relevant to the level of the role?
Would a hiring manager understand why this matters?
For entry level roles, examples from study, volunteering, casual work, internships, sport, community involvement, or customer service can work if they show the required behaviour clearly.
For mid level roles, employers usually expect workplace examples with more ownership, judgement, and impact.
For senior roles, examples need to show broader influence. It is not enough to say you completed a task well. Senior selection criteria responses should show decision making, stakeholder complexity, risk management, team leadership, strategic thinking, or measurable improvement.
This is where many candidates undersell themselves. They choose a safe example because it is easy to write, not because it is the strongest evidence. Safe examples often read as low level. Choose the example that shows the level you want to be hired at, not just the task you remember most clearly.
Follow the instructions in the job advertisement first. If the employer gives a word limit, respect it. Ignoring the limit is not a power move. It tells the panel you either missed the instruction or decided it did not apply to you. Neither is ideal.
If there is no strict limit, a practical response is usually two to four focused paragraphs per criterion. For shorter online applications, you may only have 150 to 300 words. For more formal government applications, you may have more room, but more space does not mean more rambling.
A strong response should be long enough to prove the criterion and short enough to respect the reader.
The best selection criteria responses usually have these qualities:
Clear opening context
Strong action detail
Specific result
Direct relevance to the role
No generic personality claims
No unnecessary background
If your answer feels like a story with a slow beginning, cut the beginning. Panels are not reading for atmosphere. They are looking for evidence.
Use this structure when you are stuck. Do not copy it word for word. Use it to organise your thinking.
Selection Criterion: Demonstrated ability to [insert criterion].
Response Template
“In my role as [position], I was responsible for [relevant responsibility]. A situation arose where [brief context or problem]. My task was to [objective or responsibility].
I [specific action one], [specific action two], and [specific action three]. I also [explain judgement, communication, analysis, or decision making], because [reason linked to the role or outcome].
As a result, [specific result]. This improved [process, service, accuracy, stakeholder outcome, compliance, efficiency, client experience, team performance, or delivery].”
The important part is not the wording. It is the logic. Context, responsibility, action, result.
If you cannot fill in the action section with specific steps, the example may not be strong enough.
When I read selection criteria responses, I am not looking for perfect writing. I am looking for evidence that makes shortlisting easy.
Strong candidates make the panel’s job easier because their responses are specific, relevant, and assessable.
Recruiters and hiring panels notice:
Whether your example matches the level of the role
Whether you understand the practical meaning of the criterion
Whether your actions were active or passive
Whether your result is believable
Whether you used judgement, not just effort
Whether your writing is clear enough to follow quickly
Whether your examples show patterns of capability across the whole application
The hidden thing many candidates do not realise is that applications are comparative. You are not being assessed in a quiet little bubble. Your response is being read next to other people’s responses.
That means generic answers become invisible very quickly.
A good selection criteria response does not need to be dramatic. It needs to give the panel enough confidence to say, “Yes, this person has done this before, understands what matters, and can probably do it here.”
Before submitting your selection criteria responses, check each answer against this list:
Have I answered the actual criterion?
Have I used a real example rather than a general claim?
Is my personal contribution clear?
Have I explained what I did, not just what the team did?
Have I included a result or outcome?
Is the example relevant to the role level?
Have I removed vague phrases like “excellent communication skills” unless I prove them?
Have I followed the word limit and application instructions?
Would someone outside my organisation understand the example?
Does this response give the panel a reason to shortlist me?
The last question is the one I care about most. Selection criteria are not there for decoration. They are there to help the employer decide who moves forward.
Write for that decision.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin