Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeBest Resume Builder for UX Designers
UX designers need a resume that does more than list skills and job titles. Hiring managers for UX roles evaluate process thinking, problem-solving ability, measurable outcomes, and portfolio presentation—often within seconds. The challenge is that many resume builders optimize for generic business resumes, not design careers.
The best resume builder for UX designers combines three critical factors: ATS compatibility, visual presentation, and workflow efficiency. It should help you create a recruiter-readable resume without sacrificing design quality or personal branding. It should also support the realities of UX hiring: portfolio links, project impact, case-study thinking, and concise storytelling.
Most resume builders fail because they force UX candidates into one of two bad choices:
•A beautiful resume that breaks ATS parsing
• An ATS-safe template that looks generic and forgettable
Modern UX professionals increasingly want both.
This guide breaks down what UX designers actually need, where most resume tools create friction, and which platforms support stronger hiring outcomes.
UX resumes operate differently than resumes for many other roles.
Recruiters and hiring managers often scan for:
•UX process involvement
• Research experience
• Product thinking
• Quantifiable outcomes
• Cross-functional collaboration
• Portfolio access
• Design systems knowledge
• UX tools and workflows
• Visual communication skills
The resume itself becomes a signal.
Not because recruiters expect a heavily designed document—but because UX candidates are evaluated partly on information hierarchy, communication clarity, and usability thinking.
A poor UX resume creates immediate questions:
"Can this person organize information?"
"Can they simplify complexity?"
"Do they understand audience-centered design?"
The right builder supports these expectations naturally.
Most resume tools were designed around generic hiring workflows.
Typical assumptions include:
•Chronological work history
• Corporate role descriptions
• Standard bullet formatting
• Traditional office job structures
UX hiring often breaks these assumptions.
For example:
A UX designer may need:
•Portfolio URLs
• Product launch outcomes
• Research methodologies
• Case-study style project summaries
• Side projects
• Freelance work
• Product metrics
Many resume builders make these difficult.
Common UX frustrations include:
Many platforms simply allow a URL field.
UX candidates need:
•clickable portfolio access
• prominent placement
• visual hierarchy around projects
UX work often matters more than job titles.
Recruiters want context:
Problem → Process → Outcome
Most builders only support:
Role → Company → Date
That structure often weakens UX storytelling.
Overly conservative templates create another issue.
UX hiring still values presentation.
While recruiters do not want excessive design elements, they also do not want resumes that feel visually flat and indistinguishable.
The best UX resume exists in the middle.
Not every feature improves hiring outcomes.
UX designers should prioritize practical workflow advantages instead.
ATS myths still confuse many candidates.
Modern ATS systems generally parse:
•clean hierarchy
• standard section labels
• readable fonts
• single-column or ATS-optimized structures
• clear formatting
Problems usually come from:
•tables
• excessive graphics
• unusual layouts
• decorative elements replacing content
Design should improve readability—not compete with it.
For UX professionals, portfolio access often matters more than resume aesthetics.
The resume builder should support:
•prominent portfolio placement
• project visibility
• custom sections
• personal branding links
UX hiring often involves customization.
Different applications may emphasize:
•UX research
• interaction design
• product design
• service design
• design systems
• mobile experience
Candidates frequently create multiple versions.
Slow editing workflows become frustrating fast.
The strongest UX resumes often highlight project outcomes over role summaries.
Builders should allow:
•project-based content blocks
• outcome-focused storytelling
• customized structures
Many UX candidates assume recruiters read resumes top to bottom.
That rarely happens.
Actual recruiter scanning behavior often looks like this:
Portfolio link → Current role → Companies → Outcomes → Skills → Experience details
Initial review windows can be extremely short.
Common friction points:
•buried portfolio links
• vague impact statements
• oversized skills sections
• generic design language
• dense paragraphs
Weak wording:
Example:
"Worked on improving user experience for mobile products."
Strong wording:
Example:
"Redesigned onboarding flow, reducing drop-off by 31% and improving activation completion across 1.2M users."
The second communicates process and impact.
UX hiring increasingly prioritizes measurable outcomes.
Different tools optimize for different workflows.
There is no universal winner.
There are better choices depending on goals.
NewCV aligns particularly well with modern UX workflows because it addresses a problem many designers face: balancing ATS safety with visual identity.
Practical strengths include:
•modern presentation without excessive visual complexity
• ATS-friendly structure
• fast editing workflows
• strong personal branding support
• portfolio-style presentation options
• AI-assisted content workflow improvements
• recruiter-readable formatting
For UX designers, this removes a common tradeoff.
Historically candidates chose between:
ATS performance or attractive design
Modern workflows increasingly expect both.
For candidates applying broadly while maintaining a personal brand, this approach creates less friction.
Strong for:
•speed
• template selection
• beginner-friendly workflows
Potential UX limitations:
•less flexible project storytelling
• weaker portfolio emphasis
Strong for:
•visual presentation
• customization
Potential issues:
•ATS concerns with certain layouts
• design-heavy formatting risks
Strong for:
•job tracking
• workflow organization
• resume experimentation
Best for:
UX candidates managing large application pipelines.
Strong for:
•AI assistance
• content generation
Limitations:
Generated content still requires editing.
UX resumes benefit from specificity and measurable outcomes.
Generic AI text frequently sounds repetitive.
Many UX candidates create resumes that read like design portfolios.
That sounds logical.
But it creates workflow problems.
Recruiters do not want full case studies inside resumes.
They want compressed signals.
Effective UX resumes summarize:
Problem → Action → Outcome
Weak structure:
Context overload
Strong structure:
Fast evidence
Think of resumes as navigation systems rather than documentation systems.
The portfolio handles depth.
The resume handles direction.
The strongest workflow usually looks like this:
Resume → Portfolio → Case study → Interview
Each step should create curiosity for the next.
High-performing UX candidates often:
•keep resume summaries concise
• emphasize measurable outcomes
• maintain portfolio visibility
• customize skills strategically
• prioritize readability
They do not over-design resumes.
They optimize information architecture.
Ironically, UX principles themselves improve UX resumes.
Many UX communities still repeat outdated ATS advice.
Examples:
•"Never use color"
• "Design resumes always fail ATS"
• "Only use Word documents"
Reality is more nuanced.
Modern ATS systems primarily struggle with:
•unusual structures
• graphics replacing text
• parsing conflicts
A well-designed resume with:
•proper hierarchy
• standard sections
• readable formatting
often performs perfectly.
ATS optimization is not anti-design.
Poor information architecture is the issue.
Choose based on workflow—not template screenshots.
If you prioritize:
Fast applications
Consider:
•Resume.io
• Teal
If you prioritize:
Heavy customization
Consider:
If you prioritize:
Personal branding plus ATS balance
Consider:
If you prioritize:
Application workflow organization
Consider:
The best tool is usually the one that removes friction from your existing process.
UX resumes sit at an unusual intersection between functionality and presentation.
Recruiters want clear information hierarchy, measurable outcomes, portfolio access, and ATS readability—not decorative design.
The strongest resume builders help UX candidates communicate credibility quickly while reducing workflow complexity.
For many UX professionals, the goal is no longer choosing between design quality and ATS performance.
The better question becomes:
Can the tool help communicate process, impact, and identity with less effort?
That workflow difference often matters more than template aesthetics.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
