Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA strong FAANG PHP developer resume does not read like a traditional PHP resume. Big Tech recruiters are not evaluating whether you know Laravel, Symfony, or WordPress alone. They are evaluating whether you can operate as a backend engineer inside large-scale distributed systems.
That changes everything about how your resume should be written.
At companies like :contentReference[oaicite:0], :contentReference[oaicite:1], and :contentReference[oaicite:2], recruiters and hiring managers look for evidence of engineering maturity, scalability, ownership, reliability, and measurable production impact. PHP itself is rarely the deciding factor. Your backend engineering fundamentals are.
The resumes that get interviews consistently demonstrate:
Large-scale backend systems experience
High-volume API architecture
Performance optimization with measurable outcomes
Database scalability and caching strategy
CI/CD and automation maturity
Most PHP developers accidentally position themselves as framework implementers instead of backend engineers.
That distinction is one of the biggest reasons resumes get rejected.
Recruiters immediately downgrade resumes that over-focus on:
CMS customization
Basic CRUD development
Plugin maintenance
Template-level frontend work
Generic Laravel feature development
Undefined “worked on APIs” claims
Most Big Tech recruiters spend under 30 seconds on the initial scan.
They are looking for fast signals that indicate technical depth and hiring viability.
Recruiters look for evidence that your systems operate under meaningful production load.
Strong signals:
“Processed 40M+ daily API requests”
“Reduced p95 latency by 38% across payment infrastructure”
“Supported 2.5M monthly active users”
“Optimized database queries for 500GB transactional dataset”
Weak signals:
“Worked on backend APIs”
Observability and production reliability
Cross-functional technical leadership
Strong metrics tied to business impact
System design readiness
Backend engineering depth beyond frameworks
Weak PHP resumes focus on tasks. Strong FAANG resumes focus on scale, architecture, reliability, and outcomes.
Tool lists without business impact
Responsibilities without metrics
When a resume reads like agency work or small-business web development, Big Tech recruiters assume the candidate lacks distributed systems exposure, scalability experience, and engineering rigor.
Strong candidates position themselves around backend engineering fundamentals:
High-throughput APIs
Platform engineering
Scalability improvements
Database optimization
Reliability engineering
Event-driven architecture
Distributed systems exposure
Cloud infrastructure
Observability and monitoring
Production incident ownership
System modernization
Latency reduction
Infrastructure automation
The strongest resumes make PHP feel secondary to engineering capability.
That is exactly how elite backend candidates are evaluated.
“Built web applications”
“Developed Laravel features”
Scale changes perception immediately.
Performance work strongly correlates with engineering maturity.
Hiring managers specifically value:
Query optimization
Caching strategy
Throughput optimization
Resource efficiency
Load reduction
Queue optimization
Database indexing
API response improvements
Performance metrics prove technical depth better than technology lists.
Big Tech companies heavily prioritize operational maturity.
Recruiters look for:
Incident response
Production support
Monitoring
Alerting
SLA/SLO improvements
Fault tolerance
Resilience engineering
Availability improvements
A candidate who demonstrates production ownership is substantially more valuable than someone who only ships features.
Even for mid-level backend roles, recruiters look for signs that you can participate in architecture conversations.
Strong indicators:
Microservices migration
Event-driven systems
Service decomposition
API gateway implementation
Distributed caching
Messaging systems
Infrastructure modernization
Multi-region deployment exposure
This is especially important for candidates targeting senior-level Big Tech interviews.
Your header should stay minimal and recruiter-friendly.
Include:
Full name
Location
GitHub if technically strong
Personal portfolio only if high quality
Do not include:
Full mailing address
Photos
Multiple phone numbers
Irrelevant social links
Most summaries are weak because they are generic.
A FAANG-level summary should position you strategically in 3–5 lines.
Example
“PHP developer with 7 years of experience building websites and APIs using Laravel and MySQL.”
This sounds interchangeable with thousands of candidates.
Example
“Backend engineer with 7+ years of experience building high-scale PHP platforms, distributed APIs, and cloud-native services supporting millions of users. Specialized in performance optimization, database scalability, CI/CD automation, and reliability engineering across AWS-based production environments.”
This immediately changes recruiter perception.
Your skills section should reinforce backend engineering depth, not just PHP tooling.
PHP
Go
Python
JavaScript
SQL
REST APIs
GraphQL
Distributed Systems
Event-Driven Architecture
Microservices
System Design
MySQL
PostgreSQL
Redis
Elasticsearch
Database Indexing
Query Optimization
AWS
Docker
Kubernetes
Terraform
CI/CD Pipelines
Prometheus
Grafana
Datadog
New Relic
Logging
Monitoring
Alerting
PHPUnit
Integration Testing
End-to-End Testing
GitHub Actions
Jenkins
This structure creates stronger ATS alignment and better recruiter scanning.
Your experience section determines whether you get interviews.
This is where most candidates fail.
High-performing backend bullets usually follow this structure:
Action + Technical Depth + Scale + Measurable Impact
Example
“Built APIs using Laravel and MySQL.”
This says almost nothing.
Example
“Architected and optimized high-volume REST APIs in Laravel supporting 18M+ monthly requests, reducing average response latency by 42% through Redis caching, query optimization, and asynchronous job processing.”
This demonstrates:
Scale
Architecture
Performance optimization
Technical ownership
Business impact
That is what gets interviews.
Not all metrics carry equal weight.
Big Tech recruiters prioritize engineering-impact metrics over vanity metrics.
Latency reduction
Throughput improvement
API response times
Database optimization impact
Infrastructure cost reduction
Request volume
User volume
Transaction scale
Data processing scale
Concurrent traffic handling
Uptime improvements
Incident reduction
Deployment stability
Error-rate reduction
SLA/SLO improvements
Deployment speed
CI/CD acceleration
Automation improvements
Developer efficiency gains
Recruiters care far less about:
“Completed projects”
“Worked in Agile teams”
“Delivered features”
“Collaborated with stakeholders”
These are baseline expectations.
Many candidates incorrectly assume PHP is a disadvantage.
It is not.
The problem is weak positioning.
Hiring managers care more about:
Backend engineering fundamentals
Scalability thinking
System design ability
Algorithms and problem solving
Distributed systems exposure
Production engineering maturity
PHP developers who demonstrate these capabilities compete effectively against Java, Go, and Python engineers.
Strong candidates frame PHP through:
High-scale backend architecture
Platform engineering
API ecosystems
Reliability engineering
Performance optimization
Cloud-native modernization
Data-intensive systems
The strongest resumes avoid sounding framework-dependent.
ATS optimization matters, but keyword stuffing hurts credibility.
Your goal is semantic alignment with backend engineering roles.
Include relevant keywords naturally throughout the resume:
Scalability
Distributed systems
CI/CD
System design
Observability
Reliability
Performance optimization
API design
Cloud infrastructure
Automation
Database indexing
Caching
Production support
Security
Monitoring
High availability
Microservices
Backend architecture
Include when relevant:
Laravel
Symfony
Redis
RabbitMQ
Kafka
REST APIs
GraphQL
PHPUnit
Composer
PHP-FPM
The key is integration into meaningful achievements, not dumping keywords into a skills block.
Senior backend resumes are evaluated differently.
Recruiters expect broader engineering ownership.
Strong resumes show:
System modernization leadership
Service decomposition
Infrastructure redesign
Scalability initiatives
Cross-team backend platforms
Senior candidates should demonstrate:
Incident leadership
Reliability improvements
Observability implementation
Disaster recovery planning
Operational maturity
Strong signals include:
Mentoring engineers
Leading migrations
Establishing engineering standards
Improving deployment workflows
Driving performance initiatives
Senior resumes should communicate engineering influence, not just feature delivery.
This is one of the most common rejection reasons.
If recruiters cannot tell:
System size
User volume
API throughput
Data complexity
They assume small-scale experience.
Always quantify scale.
Framework-heavy resumes often look junior.
Too much emphasis on:
Laravel features
CMS development
Plugin work
Theme customization
Reduces perceived backend engineering depth.
Technical work without outcomes weakens credibility.
Big Tech companies want engineers who move measurable business metrics.
Generic bullets destroy differentiation.
Recruiters want evidence of:
Architecture decisions
Performance tradeoffs
Scalability strategies
Reliability improvements
Optimization work
Even if the role is not explicitly architecture-focused, the absence of system-level thinking hurts candidates significantly.
Example
“Reduced p95 API latency from 780ms to 240ms across payment infrastructure by redesigning Redis caching strategy and optimizing MySQL query execution plans.”
Example
“Designed scalable backend services handling 25M+ daily transactions using PHP, RabbitMQ, and AWS autoscaling infrastructure.”
Example
“Improved production uptime from 99.2% to 99.96% through proactive monitoring, automated failover systems, and enhanced observability tooling.”
Example
“Built CI/CD pipelines that reduced deployment time by 68% and decreased rollback incidents through automated testing and containerized release workflows.”
Example
“Optimized high-volume PostgreSQL workloads by implementing indexing strategies and query refactoring, reducing database load by 43%.”
Example
“Implemented API authentication hardening and automated vulnerability scanning processes, reducing critical security incidents across customer-facing services.”
These bullets communicate engineering maturity immediately.
Recruiters filter resumes first.
Hiring managers evaluate technical potential second.
The evaluation question becomes:
“Could this person operate effectively inside a large-scale engineering organization?”
That assessment depends on:
Complexity handled
Ownership demonstrated
Scale supported
Technical judgment
Reliability mindset
Communication clarity
Business impact
The best resumes reduce uncertainty quickly.
That is the real goal.
A FAANG PHP resume should never position you as “just a PHP developer.”
It should position you as:
A backend engineer
A scalability-focused systems thinker
A production-minded technical owner
A reliability-focused engineer
A high-impact problem solver
PHP is simply the implementation language.
Your resume must sell the engineering depth behind it.
The candidates who consistently land Big Tech interviews are the ones who demonstrate:
Scale
Architecture
Performance
Reliability
Ownership
Business impact
Not just framework familiarity.
That distinction is what separates average backend resumes from elite Big Tech resumes.
NGINX
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
