Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeAn AI CV checker can help you improve your CV, but it cannot tell you whether your CV will actually make sense to a recruiter or hiring manager. That is the part candidates often misunderstand. Most AI CV checker tools look for keywords, structure, readability, missing sections, spelling issues, and possible applicant tracking system problems. Useful? Yes. Enough? No. In the UK job market, your CV still needs to show relevance, judgement, impact, and a clear match to the role. An AI tool may say your CV is strong because it contains the right phrases. A recruiter may still reject it because the experience looks vague, inflated, badly positioned, or simply not aligned with the vacancy. The best use of an AI CV checker is not to let it write your CV for you, but to use it as a quality control tool before applying.
An AI CV checker reviews your CV against patterns it has been trained to recognise. Depending on the tool, it may assess formatting, grammar, keyword relevance, ATS compatibility, section structure, role alignment, readability, and whether your CV appears to match a job description.
That sounds impressive, and sometimes it is genuinely helpful. But let’s be clear about what is happening. The tool is not sitting there like a senior hiring manager thinking, “Would I trust this person with a £3 million client portfolio?” It is reading signals.
Those signals usually include:
Whether your CV contains relevant job title keywords
Whether your skills match the job description
Whether your employment history is easy to scan
Whether your CV has standard sections such as profile, experience, education, and skills
Whether the language is clear, active, and specific
Whether your CV may pass through an applicant tracking system without obvious formatting issues
When someone searches for an AI CV checker, they usually want one of three things. They either want to know whether their CV is good enough, they want a score before applying, or they want a quick way to improve their CV without paying for professional help.
That is understandable. Applying for jobs in the UK can feel like throwing your CV into a black hole and hoping someone friendly lives inside it. When candidates receive silence, they often assume the problem is the applicant tracking system. Sometimes it is. More often, the issue is positioning.
An AI CV checker can help with the mechanical side of CV quality. It can show whether your CV is readable, keyword relevant, and structurally sound. But the bigger question is not “Does my CV score well?” The better question is “Would this CV help a recruiter quickly understand why I am a credible fit for this specific role?”
Those are not the same thing.
A CV can score well and still fail because:
The achievements sound generic
The job titles are unclear
The profile section is too broad
The CV is trying to appeal to every employer at once
Whether measurable achievements are included
Whether there are spelling, grammar, or consistency problems
That is useful, especially if your CV is messy, outdated, too vague, or missing obvious keywords. But an AI CV checker does not fully understand context. It may recognise that you used the phrase “stakeholder management”, but it does not know whether you handled one internal stakeholder politely on Teams or managed conflicting expectations across five senior directors during a difficult business transformation. Recruiters can tell the difference. Hiring managers definitely can.
The most relevant experience is buried too low
The responsibilities are listed without commercial impact
The CV repeats the job description without proving competence
The candidate looks overqualified, underqualified, or unfocused
That is where recruiter judgement comes in. AI checks patterns. Recruiters assess fit, risk, credibility, and relevance.
Most candidates imagine recruiters reading CVs carefully from top to bottom. Lovely thought. Not usually reality.
In real screening, a recruiter is often doing an initial relevance scan. They are trying to answer a few practical questions very quickly:
Does this person broadly match the role?
Is the recent experience relevant?
Have they done this type of work before?
Is the level right?
Are there any obvious gaps, contradictions, or concerns?
Can I confidently send this CV to a hiring manager?
The first read is rarely emotional. It is more like risk assessment. A recruiter is looking for enough evidence to keep reading. If your CV makes that difficult, you lose momentum.
This is where AI CV checker tools can help. They can flag clutter, poor structure, weak verbs, missing keywords, and readability problems. But they cannot always judge whether your strongest evidence is placed where a recruiter needs to see it.
For example, if you are applying for a UK project manager role and your strongest project delivery evidence is hidden under a job from seven years ago, an AI tool may still like your keyword match. A recruiter may think your recent experience is not relevant enough and move on.
Recruitment is not just about what is present. It is about what is visible at the right moment.
An AI CV checker is best used for technical and structural improvement. Think of it as a diagnostic tool, not a final decision maker.
Most AI CV checkers compare your CV with a job description and identify missing keywords. This can be useful because employers often search for specific skills, systems, certifications, methodologies, and job titles.
For UK roles, this might include terms such as:
Account management
Financial reporting
Stakeholder engagement
Procurement
CRM
Salesforce
CIPD
ACCA
Prince2
Agile
NHS
Local authority
Compliance
Business development
The trick is not to stuff these words into your CV like you are decorating a Christmas tree. Keywords need to sit naturally inside real evidence. If the job asks for stakeholder management, do not just add “stakeholder management” to your skills section and call it a day. Show where you used it, with whom, and to achieve what.
AI tools are often good at spotting weak phrases such as “responsible for”, “helped with”, “worked on”, and “involved in”. These phrases are not always wrong, but they often make your CV sound passive.
Weak Example:
Responsible for supporting sales activity and helping with client accounts.
Good Example:
Managed a portfolio of 45 SME client accounts, improving renewal rates by strengthening follow up processes and resolving recurring service issues.
The second version gives a recruiter something to work with. It shows scope, ownership, and outcome. That is what hiring teams care about.
A CV should be easy to scan. This sounds basic, but many candidates make their CV physically tiring to read. Dense paragraphs, inconsistent spacing, tiny font sizes, long lists of duties, and decorative formatting can all work against you.
AI CV checkers can flag readability issues, but your own judgement still matters. A good CV should allow a recruiter to understand your career direction, current level, and strongest evidence within seconds.
Most CVs need a clear structure. For the UK job market, a strong modern CV usually includes:
Name and contact details
Professional profile
Key skills or core strengths
Professional experience
Education and qualifications
Technical skills where relevant
Certifications, memberships, or training where relevant
Not every CV needs every possible section. A graduate CV, executive CV, career change CV, and technical CV all need slightly different treatment. But if your CV lacks basic structure, an AI checker can help you spot the obvious gaps.
Applicant tracking systems are often blamed for everything. They do matter, but they are not magical rejection robots sitting in a basement destroying dreams for sport.
Most ATS problems come from overly designed CVs, unreadable formatting, missing keywords, unusual section labels, tables that parse badly, graphics, text boxes, and file types that do not upload cleanly.
An AI CV checker may flag issues such as:
Complicated formatting
Missing job titles
Missing dates
Overuse of columns
Non standard section headings
Poor keyword match
Missing contact information
These checks are useful. But passing an ATS is only the first hurdle. After that, a human still has to believe your CV.
This is the important part. AI can review your CV, but it does not always understand hiring judgement.
A CV can contain the right skills but still feel wrong for the level. For example, a candidate may apply for a senior operations manager role and include plenty of operations keywords, but the CV only shows task execution, not leadership, budget ownership, strategy, or decision making.
An AI checker may reward the keyword match. A hiring manager may think, “This person has supported operations, but I do not see evidence they have led it.”
That distinction matters.
Candidates often use language that sounds bigger than the evidence underneath it. Words like “led”, “owned”, “transformed”, “strategic”, and “executive level” can be powerful, but only if the CV proves them.
Recruiters notice when language feels inflated. If someone says they “led transformation” but the bullet point only describes attending project meetings, the credibility drops. Not because the candidate is bad, but because the CV is overselling.
AI does not always catch that mismatch.
Some AI CV checker tools are built around broad international advice. That can create problems.
For UK applications, candidates usually do not need to include personal details such as date of birth, marital status, nationality, a photograph, or full home address. UK employers expect a professional, focused CV that avoids unnecessary personal information.
A tool that gives generic global CV advice may not always reflect British hiring norms. That is why local judgement matters. A CV for the United Kingdom should feel appropriate for UK recruiters, UK employers, and UK hiring processes.
A finance CV, sales CV, marketing CV, NHS CV, engineering CV, HR CV, and software developer CV are not judged in the same way.
A sales hiring manager may care heavily about revenue, pipeline, conversion rates, territories, and account growth. A finance hiring manager may care about controls, reporting accuracy, systems, compliance, month end, audit exposure, and stakeholder confidence. A software hiring manager may care about tech stack, product complexity, code quality, scale, and problem solving.
AI can help with keywords, but it may miss the deeper evaluation logic of the role.
This is one of my biggest frustrations with AI CV tools. They can push candidates towards safe, polished, generic CV language. The CV becomes clean, but forgettable.
Recruiters read many CVs that sound almost identical:
Results driven professional
Excellent communication skills
Strong attention to detail
Proven track record
Fast paced environment
Team player
Passionate about delivering excellence
None of these phrases are automatically wrong. They are just not evidence. They are claims. Hiring teams do not hire claims. They hire proof.
The biggest mistake is treating the AI score as the truth.
A high score can make you feel reassured, but it does not guarantee interviews. A low score can make you panic, even when the CV may be strong but written for a more niche, senior, or specialised role that the tool does not understand properly.
An AI CV checker score is a signal, not a verdict.
I have seen candidates obsess over moving a CV score from 78 to 92 while ignoring the real issue: their CV does not clearly explain why their last two roles make them suitable for the vacancy. That is like repainting the front door while the roof is missing. Nice effort, wrong priority.
Use the score as a prompt for review. Ask what the tool is noticing, then decide whether the recommendation genuinely improves your CV for the role.
The stronger question is not “How do I get a perfect AI CV score?” The stronger question is “Does this CV make the hiring decision easier?”
An AI CV checker works best when you use it as part of a practical CV review process.
Do not upload a random generic CV and expect meaningful feedback. Always compare your CV against a specific role. Hiring is contextual. A strong CV for one vacancy may be weak for another.
Before using the checker, read the job advert properly and identify:
The core responsibilities
The required skills
The preferred experience
The seniority level
The sector context
The tools, systems, or qualifications mentioned
The problems the employer likely needs solved
Then check whether your CV reflects those points honestly and clearly.
AI tools may tell you which keywords are missing. Your job is to decide whether those keywords represent real experience.
For each major requirement, ask:
Have I actually done this?
Where is the evidence in my CV?
Is it visible enough?
Have I shown scope, level, and impact?
Would a recruiter understand the relevance quickly?
This step matters because simply adding keywords without evidence makes your CV weaker, not stronger. Recruiters can smell keyword stuffing. It has a very particular scent. Desperation with formatting.
Some suggestions will be helpful. Some will be generic nonsense dressed as optimisation.
Good AI feedback might tell you:
Your CV lacks measurable achievements
Your profile is too broad
Your skills section misses important role keywords
Your bullets are too responsibility focused
Your formatting may be difficult for ATS parsing
Your CV does not reflect the job description closely enough
Weak AI feedback might tell you:
Add more buzzwords
Make every bullet sound dramatic
Use unnatural keyword repetition
Add skills you cannot defend in interview
Rewrite your CV into generic corporate language
Add irrelevant sections just because they are common
The goal is not to please the tool. The goal is to improve the human reading experience while keeping your CV searchable and relevant.
The top third of your CV carries a lot of weight. This is where a recruiter forms their first impression of your relevance.
Your profile and key skills should not be generic. They should position you for the role you want.
Weak Example:
I am a hardworking and motivated professional with excellent communication skills and a passion for success.
This tells me almost nothing. Hardworking according to whom? Passion for what? Success measured how? It is pleasant, but empty.
Good Example:
Commercially focused account manager with experience managing B2B client portfolios across professional services and technology sectors. Strong record of improving renewal conversations, identifying growth opportunities, and working with internal teams to resolve service issues before they affect retention.
This gives direction. It tells the recruiter the candidate’s market, function, value, and likely fit.
A strong CV does not need every bullet to include a number, but it does need evidence of contribution. Numbers help because they show scale and impact.
Useful achievement details can include:
Revenue generated
Costs reduced
Time saved
Process improvements
Team size
Client portfolio size
Budget responsibility
Project value
Compliance outcomes
Customer satisfaction improvement
But avoid forcing fake metrics. If you do not have numbers, use clear context.
For example, “Improved onboarding process for new starters by creating clearer manager guidance and reducing repeated queries from hiring teams” is still stronger than “Assisted with onboarding”.
A useful AI CV checker result should help you make better decisions about your CV. It should not just produce a score and a list of vague improvements.
After using the tool, you should be able to answer:
Which keywords are genuinely missing?
Which parts of my CV are too vague?
Which sections are hard to scan?
Does my CV match the target role clearly enough?
Are my achievements specific and credible?
Is my formatting safe for ATS software?
Have I accidentally buried my strongest evidence?
Does the CV sound like me, or like a robot wearing a blazer?
That last one matters more than people think. A CV should be professional, but it should still sound credible and human. If AI rewrites your CV so heavily that you cannot defend the language in interview, it has not helped you. It has created a future problem with better spacing.
An AI CV checker and a human CV review are not the same thing.
An AI checker is useful for speed, structure, consistency, keyword matching, and basic optimisation. A human reviewer, especially someone who understands recruitment, can assess positioning, credibility, role fit, market expectations, and whether the CV tells the right career story.
Here is the practical difference.
An AI tool may say: “Add more leadership keywords.”
A recruiter may say: “You are using leadership language, but your examples show coordination, not leadership. Either strengthen the evidence or reposition this more honestly.”
That distinction protects you in interview. Hiring managers do not just read the CV. They test it. If your CV claims senior stakeholder influence, they may ask who the stakeholders were, what influence you had, what resistance you faced, and what changed because of your involvement.
AI can polish. Recruiters pressure test.
A CV can become too optimised. This happens when candidates write for software instead of humans.
Signs include:
The same keywords appear unnaturally throughout the CV
The profile sounds like a job advert copied backwards
Every bullet starts with dramatic action verbs but lacks substance
Skills are listed without evidence in the experience section
The CV feels broad rather than targeted
The language sounds polished but not believable
The document is technically correct but emotionally forgettable
A recruiter does not need theatrical language. They need clarity. Hiring managers do not need you to sound like a leadership podcast. They need to understand what you can do, at what level, and whether you can solve their problem.
The best CVs are optimised, but not over engineered. They are searchable, scannable, specific, and credible.
Recruiters notice patterns because we see volume. We see the same mistakes again and again, across different industries, levels, and markets.
A CV is not just a list of jobs. It shows direction. If your CV looks scattered, the recruiter may question what you actually want next.
This matters in the UK job market because employers are often cautious. They want to know why this role makes sense for you now. If your CV does not answer that, they may assume you are applying randomly.
Sometimes candidates apply for roles below their level because they want a change, stability, flexibility, or a different sector. That can be valid. But if the CV screams “I will be bored in three months”, employers may hesitate.
AI may not spot that risk. A recruiter will.
Recruiters look for achievements that feel proportionate to the role. If a junior candidate claims they “transformed global business strategy”, I am going to raise an eyebrow. Possibly both.
Strong CV writing is not about making everything sound enormous. It is about making your contribution clear and believable.
If your CV says you are experienced in compliance but your work history barely mentions compliance responsibilities, there is a gap. If your profile says you are a people manager but your roles do not show team size, reporting lines, or leadership scope, there is a gap.
AI may reward the keyword. A recruiter questions the evidence.
Once you receive AI feedback, review your CV through five recruiter level questions.
A recruiter should be able to understand what kind of role you are suitable for without solving a puzzle. Your CV should not be so broad that it could apply to operations, marketing, HR, customer service, and office management all at once.
Broad CVs often come from fear. Candidates worry that targeting one direction will close other doors. In reality, a vague CV usually closes more doors because nobody knows where to place you.
Do not make the recruiter work too hard. If your current or recent experience is highly relevant, make that obvious. If your older experience is more relevant, use your profile and key skills to bring that connection forward.
Responsibilities explain what you were meant to do. Impact shows what changed because you did it well.
A CV full of responsibilities tells me the job description. A CV with impact tells me the candidate’s value.
Replace vague phrases with concrete detail. “Managed projects” is weaker than “Managed cross functional projects involving finance, operations, and external suppliers to improve reporting accuracy across regional teams.”
Specific does not mean long. It means useful.
This is the test many candidates forget. Your CV is not just a document to win interviews. It becomes the agenda for the interview.
If you write “strategic leadership”, be ready to explain strategy. If you write “data analysis”, be ready to explain the tools, decisions, and outcomes. If you write “commercial growth”, be ready to talk numbers.
Never let AI make claims that your interview self cannot cash.
Free AI CV checkers can be useful, but you should treat them with caution. Some are genuinely helpful. Others exist mainly to push you towards paid CV writing, premium scoring, or endless fear based recommendations.
A free tool may flag real issues, but it may also make your CV sound worse than it is so you feel pressured to upgrade. That does not mean all free tools are bad. It means you should read the feedback critically.
Trust the feedback more when it is specific, explainable, and linked to the role you are targeting. Trust it less when it gives vague warnings without showing what to change.
Good feedback sounds like: “Your CV does not mention budget ownership, but the job description lists budget management as a core requirement.”
Weak feedback sounds like: “Your CV lacks impact. Upgrade now to discover why.”
Conveniently mysterious. Very helpful to nobody.
The best way to use AI is to combine machine feedback with human judgement.
Use AI to find technical weaknesses. Use recruiter logic to decide what actually matters.
A strong process looks like this:
Choose one target role
Compare your CV against that role
Run the CV through an AI checker
Review missing keywords carefully
Add only truthful, relevant evidence
Rewrite vague bullets into specific contribution statements
Check formatting for ATS readability
Read the CV as a recruiter would, starting from the top
Remove inflated claims you cannot defend
Tailor the final version before applying
This is slower than uploading your CV and accepting every AI suggestion. It is also much better. Hiring is not won by the most algorithm friendly CV. It is won by the CV that makes the strongest relevant case for the role.
Yes, an AI CV checker is worth using, but only if you understand its limits. It can help you improve structure, keywords, readability, ATS compatibility, and basic clarity. It can catch issues you may miss because you are too close to your own CV.
But it cannot fully judge your career story, your credibility, your seniority, your market positioning, or whether a hiring manager will see you as the right person for the role.
Use it as a second pair of eyes, not as the hiring authority. The real aim is not to achieve a perfect score. The real aim is to create a CV that is clear, relevant, searchable, credible, and easy for a UK recruiter to confidently move forward.
That is the part that gets interviews.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Error reduction
System implementation results
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin