Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeRecruiters screen CVs by looking for fast evidence that you match the role: relevant experience, clear job titles, sector fit, measurable achievements, career progression, location, salary alignment, right to work, and whether your background makes sense for the vacancy. In the UK job market, most CVs are not read slowly from top to bottom at the first stage. They are scanned, questioned, compared, and either moved forward, parked, or rejected.
That sounds harsh, but it is usually practical rather than personal. A recruiter is trying to answer one question quickly: Can I confidently put this person in front of the hiring manager without creating doubt? Your CV’s job is not to tell your entire professional life story. It is to make that decision easy.
When candidates imagine CV screening, they often picture someone sitting with a cup of tea, reading every line carefully and thoughtfully. Lovely image. Not usually reality.
Most recruiters screen CVs under pressure. They may be working on several roles, managing hiring manager expectations, chasing interview feedback, dealing with applicants who are clearly unsuitable, and trying to find the few candidates who are genuinely worth a call.
The first CV screen is usually a filtering exercise. I am not reading to admire your writing style. I am reading to understand whether there is enough evidence to justify the next step.
At the first stage, I am usually checking:
Does this person do the kind of work this role requires?
Have they worked in a similar industry, environment, or level of complexity?
Is their recent experience relevant enough?
Are their job titles and responsibilities aligned with the vacancy?
Is there evidence of impact, not just activity?
The first thing I usually look at is your current or most recent role, because that gives me the fastest signal of relevance.
I am looking at your job title, employer, dates, sector, and the substance of your responsibilities. This tells me whether your experience is close to what the hiring manager asked for or whether I need to stretch the logic.
For example, if I am recruiting for a Senior Finance Business Partner role in a UK retail business, I am immediately looking for:
Recent finance business partnering experience
Stakeholder management with commercial teams
Budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and performance analysis
Evidence of influencing decisions, not just producing reports
Scale, such as revenue, headcount, regions, or business unit size
Systems exposure if the hiring manager has specified it
Are there gaps, jumps, or confusing moves that need explaining?
Does the CV feel credible, clear, and professionally presented?
Can I explain this candidate to the hiring manager in one or two sentences?
That last point matters more than candidates realise. A recruiter does not simply forward a CV into the void. In many hiring processes, the recruiter has to position the candidate. If your CV is unclear, vague, or full of generic claims, it makes you harder to represent.
A strong CV gives the recruiter language they can use. A weak CV makes the recruiter do detective work. And when there are enough stronger candidates available, detective work loses.
Signs that the person can operate at senior stakeholder level
I am not looking for a beautifully poetic personal statement about being passionate, dynamic, and results driven. Everyone is apparently passionate and results driven. The CV needs to prove it.
This is where many candidates lose momentum. They put too much energy into the opening profile and not enough into making their most recent role instantly understandable.
Your current or latest role should answer three things quickly:
What kind of work you do
What level you operate at
Why that experience is relevant to the role you want next
If I have to read six paragraphs to understand your basic fit, the CV is working too hard against itself.
Recruiters often spend only seconds on the first scan of a CV, especially when there is a high volume of applications. That does not mean your CV is only ever given seconds. It means the first decision is fast.
The first scan is usually about relevance. If the CV passes that scan, the recruiter may go back and read more carefully. If it does not pass, it may never receive a deeper read.
This is the part candidates understandably dislike, but it is important to understand. Your CV is not being judged in isolation. It is being judged against the job brief, the hiring manager’s preferences, the applicant pool, salary expectations, urgency, and the recruiter’s confidence in presenting you.
A recruiter may scan your CV first for:
Current job title
Recent employer
Location or working pattern compatibility
Core skills
Industry relevance
Years or depth of experience
Qualifications or certifications where essential
Clear evidence of achievements
Obvious red flags or missing information
Then, if the CV looks promising, they read more carefully. That second read is where nuance helps you. The first scan gets you attention. The second read builds confidence.
This is why clarity beats cleverness. If your CV hides the important information under dense paragraphs, decorative formatting, or vague career language, you may be rejected before your strongest evidence is even noticed.
A recruiter is not only asking, “Can this person do the job?” They are asking, “Can I defend this shortlist?”
That is the hidden part of CV screening that many candidates miss.
When I shortlist someone, I am usually making a judgement call. I may need to explain to the hiring manager why this person is worth interviewing. If the fit is obvious, easy. If the fit is less obvious but potentially strong, I need evidence.
That evidence might be:
A similar role in a comparable organisation
Strong achievements that match the employer’s current problems
Transferable experience that is clearly framed
Progression that shows capability and trust
Technical skills that match the job requirements
Sector exposure that reduces onboarding risk
Leadership, commercial judgement, or stakeholder impact
Hiring managers often say they are open minded. Sometimes they are. Sometimes they are open minded in theory and strangely specific in practice. They may say, “We are flexible on sector,” then reject every CV from outside their industry. They may say, “We want potential,” then favour the safest candidate with the most obvious match.
That is not always fair, but it is common.
Your CV needs to reduce perceived risk. Recruiters and hiring managers are drawn to candidates who feel easy to understand and easy to justify. This does not mean you need to be a perfect match. It means your CV must show the logic behind your fit.
Recruiters do not all screen CVs in exactly the same order, but there is a common pattern. Here is how I typically evaluate a CV when screening for a professional role in the UK.
Recent experience carries the most weight because it is the closest indicator of what you can do now. A brilliant role from ten years ago helps, but it will not usually compensate for an unclear or irrelevant recent career history.
I look at whether your latest role connects naturally to the vacancy. If it does, you have my attention. If it does not, your CV needs to explain the transition clearly.
Job titles are imperfect, but they matter because they give a quick signal. I look for whether your title suggests the right level of responsibility.
The problem is that job titles vary wildly between companies. A “Manager” in one business may manage a team of twenty. A “Manager” somewhere else may manage a spreadsheet and a dream. So I look beyond the title into scope.
Your CV should make your level clear through context:
Team size
Budget responsibility
Stakeholder seniority
Project scale
Revenue impact
Decision making authority
Geographic or operational scope
Recruiters look at where you have worked because employer context helps us understand your environment.
This does not mean brand names are everything. They are not. But context matters.
A candidate from a fast paced SME may bring different strengths from someone in a large corporate. A public sector background may suggest different processes, governance, and stakeholder complexity than a private equity backed business. A UK start up environment may signal pace and ambiguity, while a regulated financial services firm may signal controls and compliance.
None of these are automatically good or bad. They simply help the recruiter understand how close your experience is to the employer’s world.
Keywords matter, but not in the lazy way people talk about ATS systems. The real purpose of keywords is to help recruiters and hiring managers recognise fit quickly.
If the job requires account management, Salesforce, stakeholder engagement, financial modelling, procurement, employment law, Python, or NHS experience, those terms need to appear naturally where they are true.
The mistake is stuffing a CV with keywords without evidence. That may help you appear in a search, but it will not survive human screening.
A better approach is to connect keywords to responsibility and impact.
Weak Example:
Experienced in stakeholder management, reporting, and process improvement.
Good Example:
Led monthly performance reporting for senior commercial stakeholders, identifying margin risks and improving forecast accuracy across three UK regions.
The good version gives me more than keywords. It gives me context, action, and business relevance.
Recruiters notice achievements because they separate doers from describers.
Many CVs list responsibilities only. Responsibilities tell me what you were supposed to do. Achievements tell me whether you did it well.
A strong CV explains outcomes such as:
Revenue growth
Cost savings
Process improvements
Time saved
Risk reduced
Customer retention improved
Team performance increased
Projects delivered
Compliance strengthened
Stakeholder satisfaction improved
Not every achievement needs a number, but numbers help when they are honest and relevant. If you cannot quantify something, explain the result clearly.
For example, “Improved onboarding process, reducing repeated candidate queries and giving hiring managers clearer interview preparation” is still useful because it explains practical impact.
Dates are not just admin. They tell a story.
I look at career movement because it helps me understand stability, progression, and decision making. Short stints are not automatically a problem, especially in contract work, redundancy situations, start ups, restructures, or project based roles. But unexplained patterns can create doubt.
A CV with three unexplained short roles in a row makes a recruiter pause. Not because short roles are morally wrong, obviously. This is recruitment, not Victorian judgement hour. But because hiring managers will ask why.
If there are gaps or short moves, explain them briefly and calmly. Do not over apologise. Do not hide them with strange formatting. Recruiters notice.
In the UK, location still matters, even with hybrid work. Many employers say they offer flexibility, but the reality can be more specific.
A job advert may say hybrid, but the hiring manager may expect two or three days per week in London, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Bristol, Edinburgh, or wherever the office is based. If your location is unclear, the recruiter may need to check whether the commute is realistic.
If you are relocating, open to hybrid, or targeting remote roles, make that clear. Do not leave the recruiter guessing.
For some roles, qualifications are essential. For others, they are nice to have. Recruiters check this based on the brief.
In the UK, this might include ACCA, CIMA, ACA, CIPD, Prince2, NEBOSH, SIA, QTS, NMC registration, legal qualifications, technical certifications, or industry specific licences.
Right to work can also affect screening. Employers vary in whether they can sponsor visas. If you have unrestricted right to work in the UK, and it is relevant to your job search, stating it clearly can remove friction.
A CV is easy to shortlist when the recruiter can understand your fit quickly, trust the information, and explain your value to the hiring manager.
That usually means the CV has:
A clear professional profile that matches the target role
Recent experience that is easy to understand
Job titles, employers, locations, and dates clearly shown
Responsibilities written with enough context
Achievements that show impact
Relevant skills naturally included
No unexplained gaps or confusing transitions
Formatting that works for both humans and ATS systems
A clear link between your background and the role you want
The strongest CVs do not make the recruiter work hard. They create a clean argument.
That argument might be:
“This person has done this job before in a similar UK market, has delivered measurable results, and is ready for the next step.”
Or:
“This person is slightly outside the obvious sector match, but their stakeholder experience, commercial exposure, and project outcomes make the transition credible.”
Or:
“This person may not have the exact title, but the scope of their work is clearly at the right level.”
That is what a good CV does. It gives the recruiter a credible case.
Rejection is not always about being unqualified. Sometimes it is about unclear positioning.
Here are the issues I see regularly when screening CVs.
Vague CVs are difficult to trust.
Phrases like “responsible for various tasks,” “worked with stakeholders,” “supported business operations,” or “managed projects” do not tell me enough. What kind of stakeholders? What kind of projects? What size? What outcome? What level of responsibility?
Vague language forces the recruiter to guess. Guessing is not a strong shortlisting strategy.
A general CV usually performs like a general CV. Quietly. In the background. Not causing much excitement.
If your CV tries to appeal to every possible employer, it often lacks a clear message. Recruiters need to understand what you are targeting.
This does not mean rewriting your entire CV for every application. It means aligning the profile, key skills, and most relevant achievements to the type of role you actually want.
A list of duties is not enough in a competitive UK job market. Hiring managers want to know what changed because you were there.
Weak Example:
Managed customer accounts and handled client queries.
Good Example:
Managed a portfolio of 45 key accounts, improving renewal rates by strengthening quarterly review processes and resolving recurring service issues.
The second version shows scale, method, and commercial relevance.
Some candidates bury their strongest achievements in dense paragraphs halfway down page two. This is a mistake.
Recruiters scan for signals. If the signal is hidden, it may be missed.
Important information should be easy to find:
Current role
Target relevant skills
Strong achievements
Technical tools
Qualifications
Industry exposure
Leadership scope
Commercial impact
This happens when someone has a strong title but the CV describes low level tasks only.
For example, a Head of Operations CV should not read like an administrator’s task list. A Senior Project Manager CV should show delivery complexity, governance, risk management, stakeholder leadership, and outcomes. A People Partner CV should show advisory judgement, employee relations complexity, workforce planning, and influence.
The role level must be visible in the content, not just the job title.
Recruiters are not expecting perfection. They are looking for clarity.
Questions that can slow down screening include:
Why did the candidate leave several roles quickly?
Are they permanent or contract focused?
Are they too senior for this role?
Are they too junior?
Are they actually hands on or mainly strategic?
Is their experience current?
Are they based within a realistic commute?
Do they have the required qualification?
Are they targeting this kind of role or applying randomly?
Your CV does not need to explain every life event, but it should remove avoidable uncertainty.
Applicant tracking systems are part of the process, but they are often misunderstood.
An ATS is not usually a magical robot that reads your soul, rejects you for using the wrong font, and ruins your career before breakfast. In many UK hiring processes, the ATS is mainly a database used to store applications, search CVs, manage workflow, and track hiring stages.
That said, ATS compatibility still matters.
Your CV should be easy for systems and humans to read. Use simple formatting, clear headings, standard job titles where possible, and relevant keywords used naturally in context.
Avoid:
Text boxes that may not parse properly
Overly designed layouts
Important information placed only in headers or footers
Graphics used to show skills
Icons replacing words
Unusual section names that confuse scanning
Keyword stuffing with no supporting evidence
The best ATS friendly CV is not ugly. It is clean, structured, and easy to interpret.
Use headings like:
Professional Profile
Key Skills
Professional Experience
Education
Certifications
Technical Skills
Recruiters still make human judgements. The ATS may help organise and search, but the CV still needs to persuade a person.
Candidates often think recruiters are only matching keywords. In reality, experienced recruiters notice patterns.
I look at whether your career shows growth, deeper responsibility, broader scope, or stronger impact. Progression does not always mean promotions. It can mean bigger clients, more complex projects, more senior stakeholders, larger budgets, better outcomes, or more strategic work.
An achievement from fifteen years ago is less persuasive than a relevant achievement from the last two years. Your strongest current evidence should appear early.
Even in non commercial roles, I look for whether you understand the impact of your work. Did you save time, reduce risk, improve service, support growth, strengthen compliance, improve candidate experience, reduce attrition, or make processes more reliable?
A CV shows how you think. If it is messy, repetitive, vague, or badly structured, it can create concern about communication skills. That may sound unfair, but written communication matters in many roles.
A strong candidate can still be rejected if the CV is aimed at the wrong role. For example, if you apply for a hands on operations role but your CV screams strategy only, the hiring manager may worry you no longer want operational delivery.
Recruiters become very good at spotting inflated language. If every bullet says you “transformed,” “spearheaded,” “revolutionised,” and “optimised” but gives no evidence, confidence drops.
Plain, specific language is stronger than dramatic language.
Recruiters screen CVs, but hiring managers shape the criteria.
This is important because the job advert is not always the full truth. A job description may say one thing, but the hiring manager may care most about something else.
For example, the advert may focus on technical skills, but the manager may be worried about stakeholder confidence. The advert may mention leadership, but the real issue is that the team needs someone hands on. The advert may say “fast paced environment,” which can mean anything from genuinely high growth to “we are disorganised and everyone is tired.”
When screening CVs, recruiters often carry hidden context from the hiring manager briefing, such as:
The team has struggled with candidates who lack sector knowledge
The previous hire was too strategic and not hands on enough
The manager wants someone who can deal with difficult stakeholders
The business needs someone comfortable with ambiguity
The salary is fixed, so overqualified candidates may be risky
The role requires office presence even if the advert sounds flexible
The company wants evidence of stability after recent turnover
This is why two similar CVs can receive different outcomes. One may speak directly to the hiring manager’s real concern. The other may technically match the advert but miss the underlying problem.
A good CV does not just match responsibilities. It addresses the likely hiring concerns behind the role.
You do not need gimmicks. You need clarity, evidence, and positioning.
Before editing your CV, ask: “What role am I trying to be shortlisted for?”
Not “What have I ever done?” Not “How do I sound impressive?” Not “How do I squeeze in every task since 2012?”
Your CV should be built around the target role.
Look at the job advert and identify:
The core responsibilities
The must have skills
The preferred experience
The level of seniority
The sector or environment
The likely business problem behind the vacancy
Then make sure your CV answers those points naturally.
Your profile should not be a personality paragraph. It should position you.
Weak Example:
I am a hardworking, motivated professional with excellent communication skills and a passion for delivering results.
This says almost nothing. It could belong to a graduate, a CEO, or someone applying to manage a garden centre. There is no useful signal.
Good Example:
Commercially focused Account Manager with experience managing UK B2B client portfolios across professional services and technology environments. Strong track record in retention, renewal growth, stakeholder relationships, and identifying opportunities to improve account value.
This gives me role type, market, strengths, and relevance.
Your most relevant information should not be hidden.
If the role needs Salesforce experience, do not mention Salesforce once at the bottom under “IT skills” if it is central to your work. If stakeholder management is critical, show it in your profile and recent role. If you have managed budgets, teams, projects, territories, or client portfolios, make the scale visible.
Recruiters should not have to assemble your relevance like flat pack furniture.
Use achievements that show what you did, how you did it, and why it mattered.
A useful structure is:
Action
Context
Outcome
For example:
Good Example:
Improved monthly reporting process by consolidating duplicated spreadsheets into a single dashboard, reducing manual preparation time and giving senior stakeholders clearer visibility of performance trends.
This works because it explains the practical value. It does not just say “improved reporting.”
If there is a gap, contract period, redundancy, relocation, career break, or sector change, explain it simply where needed.
You do not need a dramatic personal essay. You need enough context to prevent the wrong assumption.
For example:
Career break for family care, now actively seeking a permanent UK based role
Fixed term contract completed following delivery of finance transformation project
Role impacted by company restructure after acquisition
Relocated to Manchester and targeting hybrid roles across the North West
Simple. Calm. Clear.
Recruiters do not shortlist you because your CV has a decorative sidebar. They shortlist you because the content makes sense.
Use:
Clear headings
Consistent spacing
Reverse chronological order
Readable font
Bullet points for responsibilities and achievements
Two pages for most UK professionals, unless senior complexity genuinely requires more
A simple Word or PDF format, depending on the employer’s instructions
The design should support the content, not compete with it.
If your CV passes the first screen, the recruiter may take several next steps.
They may call you to check:
Motivation for applying
Salary expectations
Notice period
Location and hybrid working requirements
Right to work in the UK
Technical experience
Communication style
Reasons for leaving
Interest in the company and role
This call is not just admin. It is part of screening.
A strong CV can get you the call, but the call confirms whether the recruiter can confidently represent you. If your CV says one thing and your conversation says another, that creates doubt.
After the call, the recruiter may submit your CV to the hiring manager with a summary. That summary might include why you match, what your motivations are, and any points to be aware of.
This is why your CV should be truthful and easy to discuss. Anything inflated on the CV can collapse quickly in a recruiter call or interview.
“Not the right fit” is one of those phrases candidates understandably hate because it sounds vague. Sometimes it is vague because the employer has not given proper feedback. Sometimes it is used to soften a more specific reason.
In CV screening, “not the right fit” may mean:
Your experience is too far from the role requirements
Other candidates had more recent relevant experience
Your salary expectations appear too high
Your background is too senior or too junior
The hiring manager wanted closer sector experience
Your CV did not show enough evidence of a key skill
Your career moves created concerns about stability
Your location or working pattern did not match the role
The role changed internally after you applied
It does not always mean you are a poor candidate. It means the recruiter could not make a strong enough case for this specific vacancy.
That distinction matters. A rejection is not always a verdict on your ability. Sometimes it is a positioning problem. Sometimes it is timing. Sometimes the role was never as flexible as the advert made it sound. Annoying, yes. Unusual, no.
Before you apply for a role, screen your own CV like a recruiter would.
Ask yourself:
Can someone understand my target role within ten seconds?
Is my most recent experience clearly relevant?
Have I used the same language employers use for this type of role?
Are my strongest achievements visible early?
Have I shown scale, scope, tools, sectors, and outcomes?
Does every role include enough context to understand my level?
Have I removed vague claims that do not prove anything?
Are gaps, contracts, or career changes explained calmly?
Is the formatting simple enough for ATS and human screening?
Could a recruiter confidently explain my fit to a hiring manager?
That final question is the real test.
If the recruiter cannot explain why you are relevant, your CV has not done its job yet.
The biggest misconception is that recruiters are looking for reasons to reject you.
Most good recruiters are looking for reasons to shortlist you. The problem is that many CVs do not give enough clear evidence.
Recruiters are not mind readers. We cannot assume your achievements. We cannot invent your stakeholder level. We cannot guess the size of your team, budget, region, portfolio, or project. We cannot submit you based on potential alone if the hiring manager needs evidence.
A strong CV makes the recruiter’s job easier by showing relevance quickly and credibly.
That does not mean turning yourself into a keyword machine. It means presenting your experience in a way that matches how hiring decisions are actually made.
In the UK job market, where many roles attract large volumes of applicants, clarity is not a nice extra. It is a competitive advantage.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin