Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA strong LinkedIn profile in the UK should do three things clearly: tell recruiters what you do, show the level you operate at, and make it easy to understand why you are relevant for the roles you want next. Most candidates treat LinkedIn like an online CV dump. That is the mistake. Recruiters do not read profiles patiently from top to bottom. They scan, search, compare, question, and decide whether your profile looks worth opening properly. Your headline, About section, experience, skills, activity, and proof all need to work together. The goal is not to look busy or impressive. The goal is to look findable, credible, relevant, and easy to shortlist.
LinkedIn is not just a networking platform. For many UK recruiters, it is one of the first places they search before they ever post a job, reply to an application, or decide whether a candidate is worth approaching.
This is where candidates often misunderstand the platform. They think LinkedIn is mainly about posting thought leadership, collecting connections, or looking polished. Those things can help, but they are not the core issue for most job seekers.
The real question is this:
Can a recruiter quickly understand what you do, where you fit, and whether you are worth contacting?
That is the entire game.
When I look at LinkedIn profiles, I am not looking for perfection. I am looking for signals. I want to know:
What role does this person actually do?
What level are they operating at?
Which sectors, functions, tools, markets, or client groups have they worked with?
Are they aligned with the role I am recruiting for?
The biggest mistake I see is candidates writing their LinkedIn profile for themselves instead of for the person searching for them.
They write what feels nice, impressive, or personal, but they forget how recruiters actually find people. Recruiters search by job titles, skills, industries, tools, locations, seniority, functions, and hiring requirements. Your profile needs to reflect those search patterns without sounding like a keyword stuffed robot had a breakdown in your About section.
A common weak profile says something like:
Weak Example
“Passionate and results driven professional with excellent communication skills and a proven track record of success.”
This tells me almost nothing. Passionate about what? Results in what area? Communication with whom? Success measured how?
A stronger version would be:
Good Example
“Commercially focused Account Manager with experience managing B2B clients across SaaS and professional services. Strong background in client retention, revenue growth, stakeholder management, and renewal conversations.”
That works because it gives me searchable, useful information. I know the function, sector exposure, customer type, and commercial angle. It does not try to sound grand. It tries to be clear. Clarity wins more often than candidates think.
Hiring managers do not shortlist mystery boxes. Recruiters do not search for “dynamic professional”. They search for “marketing manager”, “financial controller”, “software engineer”, “HR business partner”, “salesforce administrator”, “supply chain analyst”, “NHS project manager”, “private equity associate”, and other practical terms tied to real hiring needs.
Your profile should speak that language.
Does their profile support what their CV claims?
Is there enough substance here to justify a conversation?
A weak LinkedIn profile creates friction. It makes the recruiter do the work. And recruiters, especially when dealing with volume, do not have unlimited patience for detective work. If your profile is vague, outdated, overly clever, or full of inflated language, you may not be rejected because you are unsuitable. You may simply be skipped because your relevance is not obvious enough.
That sounds brutal, but it is how recruitment often works in practice.
Your headline is one of the most important parts of your LinkedIn profile because it appears in search results, connection requests, comments, messages, and profile previews. Yet many candidates let LinkedIn auto fill it with their current job title and company.
That is usually a wasted opportunity.
Your headline should tell people what you do, what you specialise in, and where you are relevant. It does not need to be flashy. It needs to be useful.
A basic headline says:
Weak Example
“Marketing Manager at ABC Ltd”
That is not terrible, but it is thin. It gives a title and employer, but no context. A recruiter still has to click through to understand your actual value.
A stronger headline says:
Good Example
“B2B Marketing Manager | Demand Generation | SaaS | Campaign Strategy | UK and EMEA Markets”
That gives far more hiring context. It includes the role, specialism, sector, key skills, and market exposure.
For UK candidates, your headline should usually include a mix of:
Your target or current job title
Your main specialism
Your industry or sector if relevant
Key tools, markets, or technical strengths
Seniority or commercial scope where useful
This is not about stuffing every keyword into one line. It is about making your professional lane obvious.
One warning: avoid vague status headlines such as “actively seeking opportunities” as your main headline. You can show availability elsewhere, but your headline should still lead with professional identity. Recruiters are not searching for “actively seeking opportunities”. They are searching for the skill set they need.
Better options include:
“Finance Analyst | FP&A | Forecasting | Management Reporting | Excel and Power BI”
“HR Business Partner | Employee Relations | Change Management | UK Employment Law”
“Executive Assistant | C Suite Support | Board Meetings | Private Equity and Professional Services”
“Software Engineer | Python | AWS | Backend Development | FinTech”
Your headline should answer the first recruiter question before they even click:
What are you?
Not spiritually. Professionally.
The About section is where many candidates go wrong in one of two directions. They either leave it blank, or they write a long personal essay that sounds like a motivational speech.
Neither helps much.
Your About section should give useful context that is not immediately obvious from your job titles. Think of it as your professional positioning statement. It should explain what you do, where you have impact, and what kind of work you are credible for.
A strong LinkedIn About section should usually cover:
Your professional identity
Your core areas of expertise
The types of organisations, teams, customers, products, or problems you have worked with
Evidence of impact
Tools, sectors, markets, or methodologies where relevant
What kind of opportunities or conversations are relevant to you
The tone should be human, but not fluffy.
Weak Example
“I am a highly motivated professional who thrives in fast paced environments and enjoys working with people to achieve business goals.”
This sounds pleasant, but it could belong to almost anyone in almost any role.
Good Example
“I am a commercially minded Customer Success Manager with experience supporting B2B SaaS clients across onboarding, adoption, renewals, and expansion. My work has focused on reducing churn, improving product engagement, and building stronger relationships with mid market and enterprise accounts.
I am strongest in roles where customer insight, commercial judgement, and cross functional collaboration matter. I have worked closely with sales, product, support, and implementation teams, so I understand how customer success sits between retention, revenue, and product experience.”
That gives me something to work with. I can see the function, sector, customer base, business outcomes, and stakeholder environment.
The About section should not repeat your CV word for word. LinkedIn gives you a chance to connect the dots. Use it to explain the pattern of your experience, not just list everything you have ever done.
Many candidates copy and paste job descriptions into LinkedIn. That is one of the fastest ways to make a profile look average.
Recruiters already know what most job titles broadly involve. If you are a Project Manager, I know you probably manage timelines, stakeholders, budgets, and risks. If you are a Recruiter, I know you probably source candidates, manage processes, and speak with hiring managers. Listing generic duties does not help me assess your level.
What I need is scope.
Scope means the size, complexity, environment, and impact of your work. It tells me whether your experience matches the role I am filling.
Instead of writing:
Weak Example
“Responsible for managing projects, working with stakeholders, and delivering reports.”
Write something like:
Good Example
“Managed cross functional transformation projects across operations and technology teams, supporting process improvement, stakeholder alignment, reporting cadence, and delivery governance for UK based business units.”
The second version gives more context. It tells me the type of projects, the teams involved, the kind of work, and the environment.
For each role, try to include:
What the company does if it is not widely known
The team, function, product, region, or client group you supported
The scale of work, such as budget, revenue, team size, portfolio size, customer volume, or market coverage
Tools, systems, methodologies, or technical skills used
Achievements that show impact
Promotions, expanded responsibility, or leadership scope
This matters because recruiters compare profiles quickly. Two candidates may both have the same title, but one may have managed a small internal process and the other may have led a regional programme across multiple markets. The title alone does not tell me that. Your experience section should.
LinkedIn visibility is not magic. It is partly about whether your profile contains the language recruiters are using when they search.
This does not mean you should repeat the same keyword twenty times. That looks desperate and reads badly. It means your profile should include the real terminology connected to your work.
For example, a UK recruiter searching for a Talent Acquisition Manager might use terms such as:
Talent acquisition
Recruitment strategy
Stakeholder management
Employer branding
ATS
Direct sourcing
Workforce planning
Interview process
Hiring manager management
UK hiring
If your profile only says “people focused professional passionate about connecting talent with opportunity”, you may sound lovely, but you are making yourself harder to find.
Good keywords usually sit naturally in:
Headline
About section
Current and past job titles
Experience descriptions
Skills section
Featured content
Licences and certifications
Projects
Recommendations
The best keyword strategy is simple: use the words a hiring manager would use in a job brief and a recruiter would use in a search.
Do not overcomplicate this. Look at the roles you genuinely want and notice the repeated language. If the same skills, tools, job titles, sectors, or responsibilities appear again and again, those terms probably belong somewhere on your profile, assuming they honestly reflect your experience.
The important word is honestly. Do not add skills you cannot defend in an interview. LinkedIn may get you found, but the conversation will expose exaggeration very quickly. And yes, recruiters notice when a profile has every buzzword under the sun but no evidence behind it.
No serious recruiter should judge your ability by whether you have a glossy professional photo. But let us be honest: your photo and banner do affect first impressions.
You do not need a corporate headshot taken in perfect lighting. You do need a clear, current, professional looking image where your face is visible. Avoid cropped wedding photos, nightclub lighting, group photos, sunglasses, or anything that makes your profile look abandoned.
The recruiter question is not “does this person look glamorous?” It is “does this profile look credible and current?”
Your banner is less important than your headline and experience, but it can still support your positioning. A plain banner is fine. A relevant one is better. For example:
A product leader could use a clean banner connected to technology, product, or innovation
A finance professional could keep it minimal and professional
A designer could use a visual sample of their style
A speaker, consultant, or freelancer could use a banner that explains their work clearly
Avoid banners that are too motivational or cluttered. If your banner has more slogans than substance, it can work against you. LinkedIn is not a vision board. It is a professional credibility page.
The skills section is often neglected, but it helps reinforce your profile relevance. The mistake candidates make is adding random skills collected over several years without cleaning them up.
If your skills section says “Microsoft Word”, “Teamwork”, “Customer Service”, “Leadership”, “Social Media”, “Time Management”, and “Sales”, it may not be wrong, but it is not strategic.
Your skills should match the roles you want next.
For a Finance Business Partner, stronger skills might include:
Financial modelling
Budgeting
Forecasting
Stakeholder management
Management reporting
Commercial analysis
Variance analysis
Power BI
Excel
Business partnering
For a Digital Marketing Manager, useful skills might include:
Paid social
SEO
Google Analytics
Campaign strategy
Conversion optimisation
Email marketing
CRM
Performance marketing
Content strategy
Marketing automation
The skills section should not become a junk drawer. It should support your positioning.
A useful recruiter test is this: if a recruiter saw only your headline and skills, would they understand the roles you are relevant for?
If the answer is no, clean it up.
The Featured section can be powerful when used properly. It lets you add visible proof near the top of your profile. The problem is that many candidates either ignore it or fill it with content that does not support their career goals.
Your Featured section should answer one question:
What proof would make someone more confident in your credibility?
Depending on your role, you could feature:
A portfolio
A case study
A project summary
A published article
A media mention
A presentation
A certification
A website
A professional post that shows your thinking
A work sample with confidential details removed
For creative, marketing, product, design, technology, consulting, writing, sales, and leadership roles, this section can be especially useful.
But be selective. A Featured section full of random motivational posts is not proof. It is noise. If the content does not support how you want to be perceived professionally, remove it.
Think like a hiring manager. If they are deciding whether to interview you, what would reduce doubt?
That is what belongs in Featured.
Recommendations can help, but only when they are specific. Generic praise is nice, but it rarely moves a hiring decision.
A weak recommendation says:
Weak Example
“Simar is a pleasure to work with and would be an asset to any team.”
Kind, but vague.
A useful recommendation says:
Good Example
“Simar helped us hire several senior commercial roles across competitive markets. She was strong at understanding the brief, challenging unclear requirements, managing candidate expectations, and keeping the process moving without lowering the hiring bar.”
That tells me what the person actually did well.
If you ask for recommendations, guide people lightly. Do not script fake praise, but ask them to mention the work you did together, the problem you helped solve, and the result or behaviour they valued.
Good recommendations often come from:
Former managers
Senior stakeholders
Clients
Colleagues from cross functional teams
Direct reports
Project sponsors
Founders or business leaders
For UK job seekers, recommendations are rarely the deciding factor by themselves. But they can reinforce trust, especially if you are moving into consulting, leadership, client facing work, freelance work, or a role where credibility matters before the first conversation.
There is a lot of noisy advice telling candidates they need to post constantly on LinkedIn. That is not true for everyone.
You do not need to become a content creator to get hired. But a completely inactive profile can look less current, especially in industries where visibility, networking, expertise, or market awareness matter.
Activity helps when it supports your professional positioning.
Useful activity could include:
Commenting thoughtfully on industry posts
Sharing a short insight from your field
Posting about a project lesson without breaching confidentiality
Engaging with companies or leaders in your target sector
Sharing relevant events, certifications, or learning
Responding to conversations in your professional niche
The key word is thoughtful. “Great post” under twenty posts a week is not a strategy. It is digital waving.
Good comments can actually help recruiters understand how you think. I have looked at candidate activity before and thought, “This person has good judgement.” I have also looked at activity and thought, “This person may be a lot in a stakeholder meeting.” Not everything needs to be said publicly. A little restraint is not a personality flaw. It is sometimes a hiring advantage.
If you are job searching discreetly, you do not need to post about being available. You can still improve your profile, follow relevant companies, connect with recruiters, and engage selectively.
Open to Work can help recruiters understand your availability, but it should not replace proper profile positioning.
The mistake is thinking that switching on Open to Work will compensate for a weak profile. It will not. If your headline is vague, experience is thin, and skills are misaligned, visibility will only expose the weakness faster.
Use Open to Work properly by being clear about:
Target job titles
Preferred locations
Remote, hybrid, or on site preferences
Employment type
Start availability
Whether visibility is limited to recruiters or public
For UK candidates, this is especially important because location and working pattern are major filters. A recruiter working on a hybrid role in Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Bristol, or London needs to know quickly whether the practical fit is there.
One honest point: some candidates worry that Open to Work looks desperate. In most cases, it does not. Being available is not the issue. Looking unfocused is the issue.
“Open to anything” is the real problem.
If your profile says you are open to marketing, operations, HR, admin, project management, customer success, and strategy roles, recruiters may not see flexibility. They may see lack of positioning.
You can be open minded privately. Publicly, your profile still needs direction.
Your LinkedIn profile and CV should support each other, but they do not need to be identical.
Your CV is usually more targeted, private, and application specific. Your LinkedIn profile is broader, public, and searchable. That means you can use LinkedIn to show a fuller professional picture, but the core facts should still align.
Recruiters often compare LinkedIn and CV details. We notice when dates do not match, job titles change dramatically, employers are missing, or claims feel inflated in one version and absent in another.
Small differences are normal. Red flags appear when the story changes.
Your LinkedIn profile should align with your CV on:
Job titles
Employer names
Employment dates
Career progression
Key responsibilities
Main achievements
Qualifications
Sector background
Seniority level
It does not need to include every CV bullet. In fact, it usually should not. LinkedIn should be readable, not overloaded.
A good approach is to use your CV for tailored application detail and LinkedIn for professional context, credibility, and discoverability.
The hidden benefit is consistency. When a hiring manager checks your LinkedIn after reading your CV, they should feel reassured, not confused.
Recruiters do not all work the same way, but there are common scanning patterns.
When I open a profile, I usually look at:
Headline
Current role
Location
Recent experience
Sector relevance
Skills and keywords
Career progression
About section if the profile looks promising
Activity or Featured section if credibility or communication style matters
Recommendations if trust or seniority is relevant
I am not reading every line at first. I am trying to answer a few quick questions:
Is this person broadly relevant?
Are they at the right level?
Do they have the required sector, function, tool, or market exposure?
Does their career pattern make sense?
Are there any obvious gaps or mismatches?
Is it worth contacting them?
This is why profile clarity matters so much. A recruiter may spend more time on your profile later, but only if the first scan gives them a reason.
Candidates often assume recruiters carefully interpret every detail. In reality, unclear profiles lose attention quickly. It is not always fair, but it is real.
Make the relevant information easy to find.
Not every candidate needs the same LinkedIn strategy. Your profile should reflect your current career situation.
Make your target direction obvious. Use your headline, About section, skills, and Open to Work settings to align with the roles you want.
Avoid sounding too broad. Recruiters need to know where to place you.
Good positioning might include:
Target role titles
Relevant sectors
Key skills
Location and work preference
Availability if appropriate
Strong recent achievements
Do not write your profile from a place of panic. Hiring teams can sense when someone is trying to be everything to everyone.
Keep your profile polished but discreet. You do not need to announce anything publicly.
Focus on credibility, achievement, and relevance. Make sure recruiters can find you for the right opportunities without your profile screaming “please rescue me from this job”.
Use private visibility settings where appropriate and be careful with public activity if confidentiality matters.
This is where LinkedIn can really help, but only if you connect the dots.
Do not simply delete your old identity and declare a new one. Explain the transferable logic.
For example, if you are moving from teaching into learning and development, show the connection between curriculum design, facilitation, stakeholder engagement, learning outcomes, and training delivery.
Career changers need to reduce perceived risk. Your profile should make the transition feel logical, not random.
At senior level, your profile should show leadership scope, commercial judgement, transformation experience, board exposure, market responsibility, and strategic impact.
Avoid drowning the profile in operational detail. Hiring teams want to understand scale, decision making, business context, and leadership credibility.
Senior profiles often fail because they sound too vague. “Strategic leader driving growth” is not enough. Growth in what market? Through what levers? With what teams? Under what conditions?
Early career profiles should focus on potential, relevant skills, placements, internships, projects, education, tools, and evidence of initiative.
Do not apologise for having less experience. Just make the useful evidence easier to see.
Include:
Degree or training relevance
Projects
Internships
Volunteering
Part time work with transferable skills
Technical tools
Certifications
Career interests
Hiring teams do not expect a graduate profile to look senior. They expect it to look clear, credible, and intentional.
Some profile issues create doubt quickly. They do not always mean the candidate is poor, but they make the recruiter less confident.
Common problems include:
A headline that says nothing specific
An empty About section
Job titles with no explanation of scope
Experience copied from generic job descriptions
Too many buzzwords and not enough evidence
Missing dates or unclear career movement
Skills that do not match the target role
No clear sector, function, or specialism
Activity that looks unprofessional or argumentative
A profile that has not been updated in years
Claims that sound much bigger than the evidence supports
The last one is important. Candidates are often told to “sell themselves”, but overselling can backfire.
If your profile says you are a “visionary strategic transformation leader” but your experience section gives no transformation scope, no teams, no outcomes, and no business context, the language starts to feel inflated.
Recruiters do not need you to sound enormous. They need you to sound credible.
Before you start rewriting everything, review your profile like a recruiter would.
Ask yourself:
Can someone understand what I do within five seconds?
Does my headline match the roles I want to be found for?
Does my About section explain my professional value clearly?
Does my experience show scope, not just tasks?
Are my most relevant keywords included naturally?
Do my skills match my target roles?
Is there proof of my work, impact, or credibility?
Does my profile align with my CV?
Would a hiring manager feel reassured after reading it?
Is anything vague, outdated, exaggerated, or distracting?
Then check whether your profile answers these hiring questions:
Why this person?
Why this level?
Why this role type?
Why this sector or function?
Why now?
If your profile cannot answer those questions, it probably needs more than small edits. It needs clearer positioning.
If you only have limited time, focus on the parts that create the biggest recruiter impact.
Start with:
Rewrite your headline so it includes your role, specialism, and relevant keywords
Update your About section so it explains your value clearly and specifically
Improve your current and most recent roles with scope, tools, sectors, and achievements
Clean up your skills section so it matches your target roles
Add relevant proof to Featured if you have it
Check your location, job preferences, and Open to Work settings
Remove vague buzzwords that do not add evidence
Align dates and job titles with your CV
This will usually do more than obsessing over tiny wording choices.
A strong LinkedIn profile does not need to be perfect. It needs to be clear, searchable, credible, and relevant.
That is what gets recruiter attention.
The best LinkedIn profiles reduce uncertainty.
They help recruiters understand you quickly. They help hiring managers feel confident that your background matches the conversation. They show enough personality to feel human, but enough evidence to feel credible.
Most candidates do not need a louder LinkedIn profile. They need a clearer one.
That is the difference.
Loud profiles say, “Look at me.”
Clear profiles say, “Here is what I do, here is where I add value, and here is why I am relevant.”
Recruiters notice the second one more than people think.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin