Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA strong statement of suitability shows why you are a credible match for the role, using evidence from your work, not vague claims about being passionate, hardworking, or a great communicator. In the UK job market, especially for Civil Service, NHS, local council, charity, education, and professional services roles, your statement is often where the real shortlisting decision happens. Your CV may show what you have done, but your statement explains why it matters for this specific job.
The best statements of suitability are focused, selective, and evidence led. They do not repeat the whole CV. They connect your experience directly to the person specification, essential criteria, behaviours, responsibilities, and priorities of the role. As a recruiter, I am not looking for a life story. I am looking for relevance, judgement, proof, and clarity.
A statement of suitability is a written explanation of why you are suitable for a specific role. It is usually submitted alongside a CV or application form and is common in UK public sector, Civil Service, NHS, university, charity, council, and regulated organisation recruitment.
In theory, it is a chance to “tell us why you are right for the role”. In practice, it is a shortlisting document.
That distinction matters.
When a recruiter or hiring manager reads your statement, they are usually checking:
Can this person do the main parts of the job?
Have they understood what the role actually needs?
Do they meet the essential criteria?
Can they give evidence instead of broad claims?
Are they likely to perform well in interview?
Is their experience relevant enough to justify moving them forward?
This is where many candidates go wrong. They write a statement that sounds nice but does not help the employer make a decision. They talk about motivation, values, enthusiasm, and career goals, but they do not prove capability.
Motivation matters, but motivation without evidence is weak. Hiring managers do not shortlist people because they sound keen. They shortlist people because the application gives them enough confidence to believe the candidate can do the job.
A good statement of suitability is not just well written. It is well targeted.
The strongest ones usually have three things: clear relevance, specific evidence, and visible judgement. By visible judgement, I mean the candidate has chosen the right examples, explained the right details, and shown they understand what matters in the role.
A good statement should:
Address the role directly, not describe your career generally
Match the essential criteria and key responsibilities
Use specific examples from work, volunteering, study, leadership, or projects
Show outcomes, impact, scale, or improvement where possible
Explain how your experience transfers into the new role
Avoid generic phrases that could apply to almost anyone
Sound professional, human, and credible
The mistake I see constantly is candidates trying to sound impressive instead of useful. They write sentences like “I am a highly motivated professional with excellent communication skills and a passion for delivering results”. That sentence takes up space but tells me almost nothing.
A stronger statement shows the skill in action. For example, instead of saying you have excellent stakeholder management skills, explain that you coordinated updates between operational teams, senior managers, and external partners during a service change, helping reduce confusion and keep delivery on track.
That is the difference between a claim and evidence.
The easiest way to structure a statement of suitability is to make it follow the employer’s decision making process. Do not structure it around your feelings. Structure it around the role.
A practical structure is:
A short opening paragraph that summarises your fit for the role
Evidence against the most important essential criteria
Examples that show relevant skills, experience, and judgement
A short closing paragraph that reinforces your suitability and motivation
This does not need to feel robotic. It just needs to be easy to assess.
Recruiters often read many applications quickly. That does not mean they are careless. It means your statement needs to make relevance obvious. A beautifully written paragraph that hides the evidence is less useful than a clear paragraph that shows exactly why you meet the criteria.
I usually advise candidates to write their statement after highlighting the job advert. Look for repeated themes. If the advert mentions stakeholder engagement, service improvement, data, safeguarding, case management, policy, leadership, customer service, or project delivery, those themes are not decorative. They are signals.
Your statement should not answer every tiny line in the job description with equal weight. That creates a flat, exhausting application. Instead, prioritise the criteria that appear most important to the role.
A simple paragraph structure works well:
Name the skill or requirement
Give a specific example
Explain what you did
Show the result or learning
Link it back to the role
That link back is often missing. Candidates assume the employer will make the connection. Do not make them work that hard. If your experience is transferable, explain how.
Civil Service statements of suitability are usually assessed against the job advert, essential criteria, and sometimes Success Profiles. The strongest statements are evidence led and measured. They do not sound like a motivational speech.
Weak Example
I am very interested in this Civil Service role because I am passionate about public service and enjoy working with people. I have good communication skills, strong organisation skills, and I always work well under pressure. I believe I would be a great fit because I am committed, reliable, and eager to learn.
Why this is weak: It is positive, but it does not prove anything. The candidate has not shown what they have done, what level they have worked at, what problems they have handled, or how their experience matches the role. A hiring manager cannot score this properly because there is no evidence.
Good Example
I am suitable for this role because I have strong experience supporting operational delivery, managing competing priorities, and communicating clearly with internal and external stakeholders. In my current administrative role within a busy public facing service, I handle high volumes of enquiries, maintain accurate records, and support case progression while working to strict deadlines.
One example was when our team experienced a backlog following a change in process. I reviewed outstanding cases, identified where information was missing, and created a tracker to separate urgent actions from routine follow up. I coordinated updates with colleagues and ensured managers had a clear view of progress. This helped the team reduce delays, improve visibility, and respond more consistently to service users.
I also understand the importance of accuracy, fairness, and confidentiality in a public sector environment. I regularly work with sensitive information and know that small errors can create delays, complaints, or poor decisions. I am comfortable following policy and procedure, but I also know when to ask questions or escalate an issue rather than making assumptions.
Why this works: The candidate shows relevant public sector judgement. They give evidence of organisation, communication, prioritisation, accuracy, and service delivery. It also sounds realistic. It does not overclaim. That matters because experienced recruiters can usually smell an inflated application from three streets away.
NHS applications often need a strong link to the person specification. Candidates should not only say they care about patients or service users. They need to show how they behave in a pressured, regulated, people focused environment.
Weak Example
I have always wanted to work for the NHS because I care about helping people. I am friendly, professional, and good at working in a team. I have experience in customer service and believe my skills would transfer well to this role.
Why this is weak: It is not wrong, but it is too thin. The NHS receives many applications from people who care about helping others. Caring is expected. The statement needs to show reliability, judgement, communication, confidentiality, and the ability to work in a demanding environment.
Good Example
I am applying for this role because my experience in customer service and administration has given me the communication, organisation, and attention to detail needed to support patients and colleagues effectively. In my current role, I deal with sensitive enquiries, update records accurately, and manage competing requests from customers, colleagues, and managers.
A relevant example was when I supported a team during a period of staff absence. I helped manage incoming queries, prioritised urgent issues, and made sure information was recorded clearly so colleagues could pick up tasks without confusion. I stayed calm with frustrated customers, listened carefully, and focused on giving accurate information rather than rushing to end the conversation.
I understand that in an NHS environment, good administration is not just paperwork. It affects patient experience, waiting times, clinical teams, and service quality. I would bring a careful, calm, and practical approach to the role, with a strong awareness of confidentiality and the need to follow processes properly.
Why this works: This statement connects ordinary experience to NHS realities. It understands that admin, reception, coordination, and support roles are not “just admin”. They affect real people, service flow, and clinical pressure.
Council roles often involve public service, process, legislation, community impact, and dealing with people who may be frustrated, vulnerable, or confused. A good statement should show calm judgement and service awareness.
Good Example
I am suitable for this role because I have experience delivering accurate administrative and customer support in a busy service environment, including handling enquiries, updating records, resolving issues, and escalating complex cases appropriately. I understand that local council services often deal with residents at stressful points, so communication needs to be clear, respectful, and practical.
In my previous role, I supported a team responsible for processing service requests within agreed timescales. I checked information for accuracy, contacted customers when details were missing, and worked with colleagues to ensure urgent cases were prioritised. When customers were unhappy about delays, I listened carefully, explained what could be done, and avoided making promises outside the process.
This experience has helped me develop the judgement needed for a council environment, where fairness, consistency, and accountability matter. I am confident using systems, following procedures, and balancing empathy with the need to apply policy correctly.
Why this works: The candidate does not just say they have customer service skills. They show the specific type of customer service that matters in council work: clear information, process discipline, escalation, and emotional control.
For project roles, hiring managers want evidence of organisation, stakeholder communication, risk awareness, and follow through. They do not want a statement that simply says “I am organised”.
Good Example
I am suitable for this Project Coordinator role because I have experience supporting projects from planning through to delivery, coordinating actions, tracking progress, and keeping stakeholders informed. I am comfortable working with competing deadlines and making sure practical details are not missed.
In my current role, I supported the rollout of a new internal process across three teams. I created an action tracker, arranged meetings, followed up on outstanding tasks, and prepared progress updates for managers. When delays appeared, I highlighted risks early so decisions could be made before they affected delivery. I also gathered feedback after implementation, which helped identify where colleagues needed clearer guidance.
This experience has given me a strong understanding of the coordination work that sits behind successful delivery. I know project support is not just scheduling meetings. It is about creating visibility, keeping momentum, spotting problems early, and helping busy people stay aligned.
Why this works: It explains the real value of project coordination. Many candidates describe tasks. Strong candidates explain the purpose behind the tasks.
Customer service statements often become painfully generic. Everyone says they are friendly, calm, and good with people. The stronger angle is to show how you handle difficult situations, accuracy, expectations, and repeat problems.
Good Example
I am suitable for this customer service role because I have experience handling high volumes of enquiries while maintaining professionalism, accuracy, and patience. I understand that good customer service is not only about being friendly. It is about listening properly, identifying the real issue, giving clear information, and knowing when something needs to be escalated.
In my previous role, I regularly supported customers who were frustrated because of delays or unclear information. I learned to stay calm, ask focused questions, and check the details before offering a solution. One recurring issue involved customers contacting us without the documents needed to complete their request. I suggested a clearer checklist for the team to send in advance, which reduced repeat contact and helped customers prepare properly.
I would bring a practical, calm, and solution focused approach to this role. I am confident dealing with difficult conversations, but I also understand the importance of following process and keeping accurate records.
Why this works: It moves beyond personality traits. It shows judgement, problem solving, communication, and process awareness.
For management roles, do not write only about being supportive and approachable. Those things matter, but hiring managers also want evidence that you can deliver through others, make decisions, handle performance issues, and create structure.
Good Example
I am suitable for this management role because I have experience leading teams, improving ways of working, and supporting colleagues to deliver consistently against service expectations. My approach is clear, fair, and practical. I believe good management means giving people direction, removing avoidable confusion, and dealing with issues early rather than letting them become normal.
In my current role, I managed a team during a period of increased workload and inconsistent performance. I reviewed task allocation, introduced clearer daily priorities, and held regular check ins to identify blockers. I also worked with individual team members where quality or deadlines were slipping, making expectations clear while offering support where training or confidence was the issue.
As a result, the team improved turnaround times and reduced avoidable errors. More importantly, colleagues had a clearer understanding of what mattered most and when to escalate problems. I would bring the same balance of accountability, communication, and practical support to this role.
Why this works: It shows management as actual behaviour, not a personality description. It also avoids the common mistake of sounding either too soft or too authoritarian.
Career change statements need to do more work. The employer may not immediately understand why your background fits, so you need to build the bridge for them.
Good Example
Although my background is in retail management, I am applying for this administrative support role because I have developed strong transferable skills in organisation, communication, problem solving, and working accurately under pressure. My current role requires me to manage rotas, handle customer issues, update records, support stock processes, and coordinate with colleagues across different shifts.
A relevant example was when I helped improve our store handover process. Important updates were being missed between shifts, which caused duplicated work and customer complaints. I introduced a clearer handover log and encouraged colleagues to record actions, issues, and follow ups in one place. This improved consistency and made it easier for managers to see what needed attention.
I understand that moving into an office based role requires strong attention to detail, confidence with systems, and the ability to support others reliably. My experience has prepared me well because I am used to managing competing priorities, staying calm under pressure, and making sure practical tasks are completed properly.
Why this works: The candidate does not apologise for changing careers. They explain the connection. That is the key. A career change statement should reduce perceived risk.
Use this as a structure, not something to copy word for word. Employers can spot copied statements quickly, especially when the wording is polished but the evidence is strangely empty.
Statement of Suitability Template
I am suitable for this role because I have experience in relevant area, with a strong track record of key skill or responsibility from the job advert. In my current or previous role as role title, I have developed skills in two or three relevant skills, which match the requirements of this position.
One example of this was when I briefly describe situation or task. I was responsible for what you did, including specific actions taken. This required me to skills used, while also ensuring important requirement such as accuracy, deadlines, communication, compliance, or stakeholder management.
The outcome was result, improvement, learning, or impact. This experience is relevant to this role because explain the link to the employer’s needs.
I would bring two or three strengths to the position, along with a clear understanding of important reality of the role or sector. I am particularly interested in this opportunity because specific reason connected to the role, organisation, or work, and I am confident I could contribute effectively.
This structure works because it forces you to move from claim to proof. That is what most weak statements fail to do.
Recruiters rarely read statements in the romantic way candidates imagine. We are not sitting there with tea, soft lighting, and unlimited time, lovingly absorbing every sentence. We are looking for signals.
The main signals are relevance, clarity, evidence, and risk.
Relevance means your statement clearly matches the role. Clarity means I do not have to reread a paragraph three times to understand your point. Evidence means you have shown examples, not just described yourself. Risk means anything that makes me question whether you understand the job, meet the criteria, or can operate at the required level.
Common positive signals include:
The candidate mirrors the role requirements naturally without stuffing keywords
The examples are specific enough to be believable
The statement shows understanding of the sector or environment
The candidate explains outcomes, not just duties
The tone is confident but not inflated
The application feels written for this role, not recycled from ten others
Common negative signals include:
The statement is too generic
The opening paragraph says nothing concrete
The candidate repeats their CV without explaining suitability
The examples do not match the seniority of the role
The statement focuses too much on what the candidate wants
The wording sounds copied, exaggerated, or artificially formal
A very common mistake is confusing length with strength. A long statement can still be weak if it is full of claims. A shorter statement can be strong if every paragraph earns its place.
A statement of suitability should be as long as the application asks for, and no longer than necessary to prove your fit. If there is a word count, respect it. If there is no word count, most UK job applications work best with a focused statement of around 500 to 1,000 words, depending on the role and seniority.
For entry level or administrative roles, a concise statement may be enough. For Civil Service, NHS, senior, technical, specialist, or management roles, you may need more depth because the criteria are more detailed.
What matters is not the word count by itself. What matters is evidence density.
Evidence density means how much useful proof you provide per paragraph. Weak statements use many words to say very little. Strong statements use enough words to show context, action, and impact.
A 900 word statement full of vague claims is not strong. A 650 word statement with clear examples against the essential criteria is much better.
When in doubt, cut anything that does not help the employer answer this question: “Can this person do the job we are hiring for?”
The biggest mistakes in statements of suitability usually come from misunderstanding what the employer is trying to assess.
One mistake is writing a personal statement instead of a suitability statement. A personal statement often focuses on who you are and what you want. A suitability statement focuses on why you match the role.
Another mistake is using the same statement for every application. I understand why candidates do it. Job searching is tiring, application forms are annoying, and some portals seem designed by people who have never met a human being. But recycled statements are usually obvious. They mention broad skills but miss the specific language and priorities of the role.
Candidates also weaken their statements by overusing soft claims. Phrases like “excellent team player”, “strong communicator”, “hardworking individual”, and “fast learner” are not banned, but they need evidence. Without evidence, they are wallpaper.
Another issue is writing only about duties. Duties tell me what your job involved. Evidence tells me how well you handled it. Instead of saying you were responsible for managing enquiries, explain the volume, complexity, problem, outcome, or judgement involved.
Also avoid making the statement too emotional. It is fine to care about the organisation’s mission, especially in public service, NHS, charity, education, or community roles. But emotional commitment does not replace suitability. You still need proof.
The final mistake is ignoring the person specification. In many UK applications, especially public sector ones, the person specification is not optional reading. It is often the scoring framework. If the essential criteria say you need experience managing confidential information, prioritising workloads, and communicating with stakeholders, your statement needs to cover those things clearly.
Job adverts often use vague language. Candidates read it politely. Recruiters read it practically.
When an employer says they want “excellent communication skills”, they usually mean they need someone who can explain information clearly, adapt to different audiences, write accurately, handle awkward conversations, and avoid creating confusion.
When they say “able to work in a fast paced environment”, they often mean the workload is messy, priorities change, and they need someone who will not collapse the first time three things happen at once.
When they say “stakeholder management”, they usually mean you will need to deal with people who have different priorities, limited time, and occasionally unrealistic expectations.
When they say “attention to detail”, they may mean mistakes have consequences. That could mean compliance issues, patient records, financial data, case files, safeguarding notes, customer complaints, or senior reporting.
When they say “proactive”, they usually do not mean charging around inventing work. They mean noticing issues, asking sensible questions, following up, and not waiting passively when something clearly needs action.
This is why your statement should translate vague employer language into practical evidence. Do not just repeat “I have excellent communication skills”. Show the situation where communication mattered.
The best way to stand out is not to use dramatic language. It is to show sharper relevance than other candidates.
Strong applicants do three things well.
They select examples that match the role. They explain what they personally did. They show why it mattered.
That sounds simple, but many candidates miss one of those three. They choose impressive but irrelevant examples. Or they describe team achievements without making their contribution clear. Or they explain the task but not the outcome.
Before submitting your statement, read each paragraph and ask:
Does this help prove I meet the role requirements?
Have I shown evidence, not just made a claim?
Is my personal contribution clear?
Have I explained the result or value?
Would this make sense to someone outside my current organisation?
Have I used the employer’s priorities without copying the advert awkwardly?
Also check whether your statement has enough role specific language. If the job is about safeguarding, casework, policy, finance, procurement, service delivery, project coordination, clinical administration, or stakeholder engagement, those ideas should appear naturally where relevant.
Do not keyword stuff. This is not about tricking an applicant tracking system. It is about making the match obvious to a human reader who is trying to shortlist fairly.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin