Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeVideo interviews are not just normal interviews on a screen. They change how you are judged. In the UK job market, employers use video interviews to check communication, preparation, role understanding, confidence, judgement, and whether you seem credible enough to move forward. The strongest candidates do not simply “look professional”. They make it easy for the interviewer to trust them.
My biggest video interview tip is this: treat the screen as a filter, not a barrier. Your job is to reduce doubt. That means clear answers, calm delivery, relevant examples, good technical setup, and evidence that you understand the role. Most candidates lose points through vague answers, poor structure, weak energy, or looking underprepared. Not dramatic mistakes. Just small signals that quietly make the hiring manager hesitate.
A video interview feels more casual than an in person interview, but that is exactly why many candidates underprepare. They think being at home makes the process easier. In reality, it often makes the assessment sharper.
When you walk into an office, the interviewer gets a fuller sense of you. They see how you enter the room, greet people, handle the environment, and build rapport naturally. On video, all of that gets compressed into a small square on a screen. Your answers, facial expression, tone, eye contact, and setup carry more weight because there are fewer other signals available.
That is why video interviews can feel oddly unforgiving. A slightly flat answer can seem less confident. Poor lighting can make you look disengaged. Talking over the interviewer can seem careless, even if it is just lag. Reading from notes can make you appear scripted. None of these things automatically destroy your chances, but they add friction.
In UK hiring, video interviews are now common for first stage interviews, screening calls, remote roles, hybrid roles, graduate schemes, professional services, tech, sales, operations, HR, finance, marketing, and leadership hiring. Employers use them because they save time. Recruiters use them because they reveal quickly whether the CV matches the person. Hiring managers use them because they want to know whether the candidate can communicate clearly before investing more time.
That is the uncomfortable truth. A video interview is often not about finding the final answer. It is about deciding whether you are worth taking seriously for the next stage.
Candidates often think video interviews are mainly about answering questions correctly. They are not. They are about whether the interviewer can picture you doing the job without creating extra risk.
Most hiring managers are quietly asking themselves:
Can this person explain their experience clearly?
Do they understand what this role actually needs?
Are their examples relevant or just rehearsed?
Would they communicate well with colleagues, clients, stakeholders, or senior leaders?
Do they seem prepared, thoughtful, and commercially aware?
Are there gaps between the CV and how they speak about their work?
Would I feel confident putting this person in front of my team?
That last question matters more than most candidates realise. Hiring is not just about skills. It is about trust. If a hiring manager recommends you, they are attaching their judgement to you. If they move you forward and you perform badly later, it reflects on them too. That is why vague, messy, or overconfident answers can do real damage.
The video format makes this even more obvious. A hiring manager can spot when someone is giving memorised answers but not actually thinking. They can hear when a candidate has read the job description but has not understood it. They can tell when someone says “I am very passionate about this opportunity” but cannot explain why the role makes sense.
A good video interview does not feel like a performance. It feels like a professional conversation where your answers make the hiring decision easier.
Your setup does not need to look expensive. It needs to look intentional. There is a difference.
I have seen excellent candidates use a simple laptop, plain wall, natural light, and headphones and come across brilliantly. I have also seen candidates with impressive backgrounds and perfect cameras lose credibility because they were distracted, late, poorly prepared, or constantly checking notes.
The goal is not to look like a content creator. The goal is to remove distractions so the interviewer can focus on your answers.
Before the interview, check:
Your camera works properly
Your microphone is clear
Your internet connection is stable
Your device is charged or plugged in
Your interview link opens correctly
Your screen name looks professional
Your background is clean and not distracting
Your lighting allows the interviewer to see your face
Notifications are turned off
Anyone at home knows not to interrupt
This sounds basic, but basic is where candidates lose easy credibility. Employers understand that life happens. They are less forgiving when problems look preventable.
A hiring manager will not reject a strong candidate because a dog barks once in the background. They may question a candidate who joins late, cannot find the link, has not tested the sound, and spends the first five minutes saying, “Can you hear me now?” That is not a technology issue. That is a preparation signal.
In the UK job market, where many first interviews are squeezed between meetings, interviewers appreciate candidates who make the process smooth. Do not underestimate that. Making someone’s job easier is always a good first impression.
One of the biggest mistakes candidates make before a video interview is preparing answers instead of preparing judgement.
They search for common interview questions, write down polished responses, and then freeze when the interviewer asks something slightly different. That happens because they prepared scripts, not thinking.
Before your interview, you should understand four things:
What the role is really responsible for
Why the company is hiring
What problems the successful candidate will likely solve
What evidence from your background proves you can do those things
That is the difference between average preparation and recruiter level preparation.
A job description is not just a list of duties. It is a set of clues. If a role mentions stakeholder management several times, the employer is probably worried about communication, influence, or internal coordination. If it mentions fast paced environments, they may need someone who can cope with ambiguity and shifting priorities. If it mentions process improvement, they probably want evidence that you do not just complete tasks, you improve how work gets done.
This is where many candidates miss the point. They read the job description like a checklist. Recruiters read it like a risk map.
When preparing, ask yourself:
What would make someone fail in this role?
What would the hiring manager be nervous about?
Which parts of my experience reduce that nervousness?
Which examples prove I can handle the practical reality of the job?
That is how you prepare answers that feel relevant instead of generic.
Video interviews make rambling more noticeable. In person, natural body language can soften a long answer. On video, a long answer can quickly feel like a monologue.
The best candidates usually answer with structure. Not robotic structure. Just enough organisation that the interviewer can follow the point.
A strong answer often follows this pattern:
Direct answer first
Brief context
Specific example
Result or learning
Link back to the role
For example, if asked about managing competing priorities, a weak candidate might say they are “very organised” and “good under pressure”. That tells me almost nothing. Everyone says that. It is interview wallpaper.
Weak Example
“I am very good at prioritising and I work well under pressure. In my last role I had lots of deadlines, so I had to stay organised and make sure everything was done on time.”
The problem is not that the answer is terrible. The problem is that it is forgettable. It gives no scale, no decision making, no trade off, and no evidence.
Good Example
“In my last role, I regularly managed several client deadlines at once, so I had to prioritise based on urgency, commercial impact, and dependency on other teams. One example was when two client reports and an internal project deadline landed in the same week. I mapped what had to be completed first, agreed realistic timings with the internal team, and kept the client work protected because that had the highest external impact. Everything was delivered on time, but more importantly, nobody was surprised by the timeline. That is usually my approach to pressure. I try to create clarity early rather than pretend everything is fine until it becomes a problem.”
That answer works because it shows judgement. It does not just claim organisation. It demonstrates how the candidate thinks.
Hiring managers trust candidates who can explain their decisions. They are not looking for perfect people. They are looking for people who can handle real work without creating chaos.
Eye contact on video is awkward. Everyone knows it. You do not need to stare into the camera like you are reading the news. But you do need to avoid looking disconnected.
A common mistake is watching yourself while answering. Candidates do this without realising it. They monitor their own face, hair, expression, posture, or background. The result is that they appear distracted or slightly self conscious.
A better approach is to look at the interviewer when listening, then look near the camera when making an important point. This gives the impression of direct communication without feeling unnatural.
Also, keep your screen positioned at eye level where possible. If your laptop is too low, you end up looking down at the interviewer. It is not a disaster, but it can create a strange dynamic. Again, hiring decisions are rarely made on one tiny detail. They are made through accumulated signals. Make the signals work for you.
Your facial expression matters too. Video can flatten energy. A neutral expression may look bored. A thoughtful pause may look uncertain. A calm tone may sound low energy. You do not need to become artificially enthusiastic, but you may need slightly more warmth and vocal energy than you would use in person.
This is especially important in UK interviews, where candidates sometimes confuse professionalism with being emotionally unavailable. You can be calm and still show interest. You can be serious and still sound engaged. Hiring managers are not asking for theatre. They just need to feel there is a real person behind the answers.
Notes can help in a video interview. They can also ruin your delivery.
The issue is not having notes. The issue is reading them like a script. Interviewers can tell. Your eyes move differently, your tone changes, and your answers start sounding polished but not alive. That creates a subtle trust problem. The interviewer starts wondering whether they are meeting you or your preparation document.
Use notes as prompts, not paragraphs.
You might keep a short list of:
Key achievements
Role requirements
Company facts
Questions to ask
Specific examples you want to remember
Metrics or numbers that support your experience
The best notes are brief enough that you can glance at them and return to the conversation naturally. A sticky note near your camera can work better than a full document on screen.
Do not put your entire career history in front of you. That often makes candidates worse, not better. They become dependent on the notes and lose the natural flow of conversation.
A video interview is not an exam where you need to recite perfect answers. It is a credibility check. If your notes help you stay clear, use them. If they make you sound like you are reading a hostage statement, remove them.
A very strong video interview answer usually does two things at once. It answers the question and proves the candidate understands the role.
This is where many people fall short. They talk about their experience in isolation. They explain what they have done, but they do not connect it to what the employer needs now.
For example, if you are applying for a project management role, do not just say you have managed projects. Explain the type of projects, the stakeholders involved, the constraints, the risks, and the outcomes. If you are applying for a customer success role, do not just say you are good with clients. Explain how you manage expectations, reduce churn risk, handle difficult conversations, and spot commercial opportunities. If you are applying for a finance role, do not just say you are detail oriented. Explain how your accuracy affects reporting, compliance, forecasting, or decision making.
Hiring managers listen for relevance. Recruiters do too. We are not only asking, “Has this person done something impressive?” We are asking, “Is this the kind of impressive that matters for this role?”
That is a huge distinction.
Some candidates have strong experience but present it badly. They give too much background, too many irrelevant details, or examples that do not match the hiring manager’s priorities. Then they leave the interview thinking they explained themselves well, while the interviewer leaves thinking, “I am still not sure they understand the role.”
Your job is to close that gap.
A useful phrase is:
“The reason I think this is relevant to your role is…”
That one sentence can turn a decent answer into a stronger one because it shows you are not just talking. You are positioning.
Technical problems happen. The way you handle them becomes part of the interview.
If your sound cuts out, your camera freezes, or the platform fails, do not panic or over apologise. Fix it calmly. A short apology is fine. A long emotional spiral is not.
You can say:
“Apologies, I think the sound dropped for a moment. I am back now. Would you mind repeating the last part of the question?”
That is enough.
What you should not do is spend five minutes blaming Teams, Zoom, WiFi, your laptop, the weather, your neighbour, Mercury, and every piece of technology invented since 1997. The interviewer does not need the full origin story.
Calm problem solving is a positive signal. It shows composure. In many roles, especially client facing, stakeholder heavy, operational, or leadership roles, how you respond to minor disruption matters.
It is also wise to have a backup plan. Keep your phone nearby, charged, and ready to join the call if needed. Have the interview invitation accessible. Know who to contact if the link fails. These details are small, but they prevent avoidable stress.
Recruiters remember candidates who handle problems well. Not because technology issues are impressive, but because pressure reveals behaviour. A smooth interview is good. A slightly messy interview handled professionally can still work in your favour.
Most video interviews are not ruined by one catastrophic answer. They are weakened by small issues that create doubt.
The most common mistakes I see are:
Joining late without a proper apology or explanation
Speaking in vague claims instead of specific examples
Reading from notes too obviously
Giving answers that are too long and unfocused
Looking distracted by another screen
Treating the interview too casually because it is at home
Failing to research the company properly
Not connecting experience to the role
Talking over the interviewer repeatedly
Asking questions that prove the candidate has not read the job description
Sounding enthusiastic about getting a job, but not this job
That last one is important. Employers know candidates apply to multiple roles. That is normal. Nobody sensible expects you to have dreamt of their vacancy since childhood. But they do expect you to understand why this opportunity fits.
When a candidate cannot explain why they are interested, the hiring manager hears risk. They wonder whether the candidate will accept any offer, leave quickly, or disengage once the reality of the role appears.
This is one of those hiring areas where employers often say one thing and mean another. They may ask, “Why are you interested in this role?” What they often mean is:
“Have you thought about this properly, or are we just another application in your spreadsheet?”
Answer accordingly.
Strong examples make video interviews easier because they stop you relying on vague personality claims.
Before the interview, prepare examples around the main areas the role is likely to test. For many UK roles, this may include:
Delivering results
Managing stakeholders
Solving problems
Handling pressure
Working with difficult people
Improving a process
Learning something quickly
Dealing with change
Influencing without authority
Recovering from a mistake
You do not need a different example for every possible question. You need a flexible set of strong examples that can be adapted naturally.
A good interview example includes:
The situation
Your responsibility
The action you took
The reason behind your decision
The outcome
What it shows about how you work
The reasoning matters. Many candidates explain what happened but not why they acted as they did. That is a missed opportunity because hiring managers are assessing judgement.
For example, saying “I escalated the issue” is fine. Saying “I escalated it because the delay would have affected the client deadline and I wanted senior input before the risk became visible externally” is stronger. It shows commercial awareness, prioritisation, and ownership.
That is the level of answer that separates someone who has done tasks from someone who understands impact.
Motivation questions are where many candidates become painfully vague.
They say:
Weak Example
“I am excited by the opportunity because your company has a great reputation and I am looking for a new challenge.”
This is technically acceptable and completely forgettable. It could apply to almost any company. It gives the hiring manager no reason to believe the interest is real.
A stronger answer links the company, role, and candidate’s direction.
Good Example
“What interests me about this role is the mix of operational ownership and stakeholder work. In my current role, I have enjoyed improving processes and making teams work more smoothly together, but I am looking for a position where that becomes a bigger part of my responsibility. From what I have read, this role seems to need someone who can bring structure without slowing people down, and that is the kind of work I tend to do well.”
That answer feels more credible because it is specific. It does not overdo flattery. It explains fit.
In the UK, hiring managers tend to respond well to grounded motivation. You do not need to gush. You need to show you have thought about the role properly.
Good motivation answers usually cover:
Why the role fits your experience
Why the company or team interests you
Why the move makes sense now
What kind of contribution you want to make
Avoid making the answer only about your personal benefit. “I want development” is fine, but if that is the whole answer, the employer may hear, “I mainly want you to train me.” Balance ambition with contribution.
The questions you ask at the end of a video interview are not just polite extras. They are part of the assessment.
Weak questions usually sound like the candidate is checking benefits, flexibility, or promotion before proving fit. Those topics matter, but timing and framing matter too.
Strong questions show that you are thinking about the role realistically.
You could ask:
What would success look like in the first six months?
What are the biggest challenges the person in this role will need to handle?
How would you describe the team’s working style?
What would make someone really effective in this position?
Are there any concerns about my background that I can clarify?
How does this role interact with other teams or departments?
What are the main priorities for this role in the first few months?
The best questions create useful conversation. They also give you information. Remember, you are assessing them too. A job interview is not a royal audience where you simply hope to be chosen. You are deciding whether the role, manager, culture, expectations, and working style make sense for you.
Pay attention to how the interviewer answers. If they cannot explain success, priorities, or challenges clearly, that tells you something. Sometimes “fast paced” means genuinely dynamic. Sometimes it means under resourced chaos wearing a blazer. Ask enough to know the difference.
A follow up message will not rescue a poor interview, but it can reinforce a strong one.
Send a short, professional thank you message within 24 hours if you have the interviewer’s contact details or if communication is through a recruiter. Keep it specific and useful.
A good follow up might say:
Example
“Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today. I appreciated learning more about the role, especially the focus on improving internal processes while working closely with different teams. After our conversation, I am even more interested because the priorities you described align closely with the type of work I have been doing and where I can add value. Please let me know if there is anything else you need from me at this stage.”
This works because it does more than say thanks. It reminds them why the conversation was relevant.
Avoid follow ups that are too pushy, overly emotional, or full of new information you forgot to mention. If there is one important clarification, include it briefly. Do not send an essay called “Things I Should Have Said In The Interview”. That usually creates more concern than confidence.
If you are working with a recruiter, send them a quick summary of how the interview went. Good recruiters use that information when speaking to the client. Mention what was discussed, your interest level, and anything you want clarified. This helps them represent you properly.
Use this checklist before your next video interview.
Technical setup:
Test your camera, microphone, and internet
Check the interview link in advance
Charge your laptop or plug it in
Turn off notifications
Use headphones if your sound quality is better with them
Keep your phone nearby as a backup
Environment:
Choose a quiet place
Use a clean, simple background
Make sure your face is well lit
Position your camera at eye level
Tell others at home not to interrupt
Keep water nearby
Interview preparation:
Re read the job description carefully
Identify the main problems the role needs to solve
Prepare relevant examples with outcomes
Research the company, team, market, and role context
Know why you want this specific job
Prepare thoughtful questions
Review your CV so you can explain every major point clearly
During the interview:
Join a few minutes early
Start with calm, professional energy
Listen carefully before answering
Keep answers structured and relevant
Use examples instead of vague claims
Look near the camera when making key points
Ask for clarification if needed
Stay calm if technology misbehaves
After the interview:
Send a short thank you message
Reflect on what went well and what felt weak
Note any questions or concerns about the role
Update your recruiter if one is involved
Prepare for the next stage while the conversation is fresh
Average candidates prepare to answer questions. Strong candidates prepare to reduce doubt.
That is the simplest way to think about it.
Strong candidates do not just say they are organised. They show how they prioritise. They do not just say they are interested. They explain why the role fits. They do not just list tasks. They connect their work to outcomes. They do not try to sound perfect. They sound credible, self aware, and useful.
In recruitment, I rarely see hiring managers choose the candidate who gave the most polished performance. They usually choose the candidate who made the most sense. The person whose experience matches the problem. The person who communicates clearly. The person who seems likely to work well with the team. The person who reduces uncertainty.
That is what your video interview needs to do.
Do not obsess over being flawless. Focus on being clear, relevant, prepared, and human. Hiring managers can work with nerves. They can work with small technical issues. They can work with a candidate who takes a moment to think.
What they struggle with is vagueness, lack of preparation, poor listening, weak motivation, and answers that do not connect to the role.
A strong video interview is not about pretending to be the perfect candidate. It is about showing enough evidence that the employer can confidently say, “Yes, this person is worth moving forward.”
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin