Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeAustralian job applications are not won by sending more resumes. They are won by making it easy for a recruiter or hiring manager to understand three things quickly: what you do, where you fit, and why you are worth interviewing. That means your resume, cover letter, LinkedIn profile, and application answers all need to point in the same direction. A strong application is clear, relevant, specific, and easy to assess. A weak one forces the employer to guess.
And here is the uncomfortable truth I see often: many capable candidates are not rejected because they lack talent. They are rejected because their application makes their value too hard to find.
Most Australian job applications go through a fairly practical screening process. It is rarely as mysterious as candidates imagine, but it is also not as careful as candidates hope.
A recruiter or hiring manager is usually looking for evidence of fit, not reading your application like a biography. They want to know whether you match the role, salary range, location expectations, visa or work rights requirements, technical needs, communication level, and likely team fit.
That means your application has to survive two types of judgement:
The quick scan, where someone checks whether you broadly match the role
The deeper review, where they decide whether you are worth contacting
A lot of candidates write their applications for the second stage while ignoring the first. They include long explanations, broad career stories, and polished but vague language. The problem is that if the first scan does not find the right signals quickly, the second review may never happen.
Australian hiring teams are often lean. Recruiters are managing multiple roles. Hiring managers are interviewing between meetings. Internal HR teams are balancing approvals, salary bands, and stakeholder opinions. Your application needs to respect that reality.
That does not mean dumbing it down. It means making your relevance obvious.
The biggest mistake is applying as if the employer will figure out your potential for you.
They usually will not.
Candidates often think, “If they read my resume properly, they will see I can do this job.” That is a dangerous assumption. A recruiter may understand your background, but they still need to justify why you belong in the shortlist. A hiring manager may like your experience, but they still need evidence that you can solve the specific problems in their team.
Your job application should not simply list your history. It should position you for the role.
That means every part of your application should answer:
What role am I targeting?
What experience proves I can do it?
What skills matter most for this employer?
What achievements show impact?
What concerns might they have about me, and have I reduced them?
This is where many applications fall apart. The resume says one thing. The cover letter says another. The LinkedIn profile is outdated. The application answers are rushed. The candidate may be excellent, but the overall message feels scattered.
In recruitment, scattered usually loses to clear.
A job ad is useful, but it is not always a perfect description of the job. Some Australian job ads are detailed and accurate. Others are recycled from an old role, written by committee, overloaded with wish-list requirements, or dressed up with vague language like “fast-paced environment” and “wear many hats”.
I always tell candidates to read the job ad in layers.
The first layer is obvious: job title, responsibilities, required skills, location, salary if listed, work arrangement, and industry.
The second layer is more important: what problem is this employer trying to solve?
For example, if the ad keeps mentioning stakeholder management, cross-functional communication, and competing priorities, the real issue may not be technical skill. It may be that the role sits between difficult stakeholders and messy priorities.
If the ad mentions process improvement, reporting accuracy, compliance, or documentation several times, the employer may be dealing with inefficiency, risk, or poor systems.
If the ad asks for resilience, adaptability, and comfort with ambiguity, the team may be under pressure, growing quickly, restructuring, or operating without perfect processes. That is not always a red flag, but it is useful context.
Do not just match keywords. Read the role like a recruiter reads it: what will this person be hired to fix, manage, improve, support, or deliver?
Once you understand that, your application becomes sharper.
Tailoring your resume does not mean creating a fake version of yourself for every job. It means changing the emphasis so the most relevant evidence appears first.
This matters in Australia because many roles attract large applicant pools, especially in administration, customer service, marketing, HR, project support, finance, operations, IT, and graduate roles. If your resume makes the reader dig for relevance, you are already making the process harder than it needs to be.
A tailored resume should adjust:
Your professional summary, so it matches the role level and target function
Your key skills, so the most relevant capabilities are visible early
Your recent role descriptions, so they highlight responsibilities aligned with the job
Your achievements, so they show impact related to the employer’s likely priorities
Your language, so it reflects Australian hiring terminology and industry expectations
Do not over-tailor to the point where your resume becomes keyword soup. Recruiters can smell that from three suburbs away.
Weak Example
“Hardworking professional with excellent communication skills and a strong ability to work in a team.”
This says almost nothing. It could belong to a retail assistant, accountant, project coordinator, receptionist, or warehouse supervisor.
Good Example
“Operations coordinator with experience supporting rostering, supplier communication, workflow tracking, and process improvement across multi-site teams.”
This gives the reader a role, context, function, and relevant capability. It is still concise, but now it actually helps.
A good Australian resume is not about sounding impressive. It is about being easy to place.
Applicant tracking systems are part of modern Australian recruitment, but candidates often misunderstand how they work. An ATS is not usually a magical robot rejecting everyone because they used the wrong font. The bigger issue is that messy formatting, unclear job titles, missing keywords, or vague experience can make your application harder to search, review, or compare.
Make your resume ATS-friendly by keeping it clean and readable.
Use standard section headings such as:
Professional Summary
Key Skills
Work Experience
Education
Certifications
Technical Skills
Professional Development
Avoid overly designed templates with columns, icons, graphics, rating bars, text boxes, and decorative formatting. They may look nice, but they can create parsing issues and distract from the actual content.
The best resume format for most Australian job applications is simple, structured, and content-led.
But here is the part candidates often miss: ATS-friendly does not mean lifeless.
A resume can be clean and still strong. It can include keywords and still sound human. It can be easy for systems to read and still give a recruiter a clear picture of your value.
The real goal is not to “beat the ATS”. The goal is to help both the system and the human understand your relevance quickly.
Cover letters are not dead in Australia, but weak cover letters absolutely deserve to be.
A cover letter is useful when it explains fit, motivation, context, or a career move that your resume alone does not fully explain. It is not useful when it repeats your resume in paragraph form while saying you are “excited to apply” and “passionate about excellence”.
I see three cover letter situations where it can genuinely help:
You are changing industries or job functions
You have a strong reason for wanting that specific role or employer
Your resume has a gap, shift, relocation, or unusual career path that needs context
A good cover letter should be short, specific, and grounded in the role.
It should answer:
Why this role makes sense
Why your background is relevant
What you can help the employer do
Why the move is credible
Do not beg. Do not over-explain. Do not write like you swallowed a corporate values page.
Weak Example
“I am writing to express my strong interest in the position advertised. I believe my skills and experience make me a suitable candidate and I would welcome the opportunity to contribute to your organisation.”
This is technically polite, but it adds no value. It sounds like every other letter in the pile.
Good Example
“I am interested in this role because it combines customer operations, team coordination, and process improvement, which are the areas where I have delivered the strongest results. In my current role, I support daily workflow across a busy service team, resolve escalations, and help improve reporting accuracy for managers.”
This gives the employer something to work with.
A cover letter should not decorate your application. It should clarify it.
In Australia, recruiters often check LinkedIn, especially for professional, corporate, technical, sales, HR, finance, marketing, project, and leadership roles. Not every employer will check it, but enough do that you should treat it as part of your application.
Your LinkedIn profile does not need to copy your resume word for word. It should support the same professional story.
At minimum, make sure your LinkedIn profile has:
A clear headline that reflects your target role or professional identity
Recent experience that matches your resume
A practical About section with your core skills and career focus
Relevant keywords for your industry and role type
A professional photo if possible
No obvious contradictions with your application
Contradictions create doubt. If your resume says you are targeting project coordination but LinkedIn presents you as a general administrator with outdated information, the recruiter has to do extra mental work. Extra mental work is rarely your friend.
The point is consistency.
Your resume may be the formal application document, but LinkedIn often acts as a credibility check. It should make the recruiter think, “Yes, this person makes sense for this role,” not “Wait, what are they actually trying to do?”
Many Australian resumes are full of duties but light on impact. This is one of the fastest ways to sound average, even when your work was not average.
Duties explain what you were responsible for. Achievements explain what changed because you were there.
A resume still needs responsibilities, especially for context. But if every bullet point starts to sound like a job description, the reader has no evidence of performance.
Instead of only saying:
Managed customer enquiries
Supported administrative tasks
Prepared reports
Assisted with projects
Show the level, volume, complexity, improvement, or result.
Stronger examples include:
Managed up to 60 customer enquiries per day across phone and email, maintaining service quality during peak periods
Coordinated onboarding documentation for new starters across three business units, reducing follow-up requests from managers
Prepared weekly sales reports for leadership, improving visibility of pipeline activity and delayed opportunities
Supported project documentation, meeting coordination, and stakeholder updates for a system implementation across multiple teams
The difference is not just wording. The stronger examples help the recruiter understand scope.
Hiring managers want to know whether your experience is similar enough to their environment. Volume, systems, stakeholders, budgets, team size, locations, deadlines, compliance requirements, and outcomes all help them judge that.
Specificity builds trust. Vagueness creates risk.
You do not need to meet 100 percent of the job criteria. Many job ads are wish lists, and some include requirements that are more negotiable than they sound.
But you do need enough fit that someone can defend putting you forward.
This is especially important when a recruiter is managing the process. A recruiter does not only ask, “Could this person do the job?” They also ask, “Can I explain this candidate clearly to the hiring manager?”
That is a very different question.
If your background is adjacent but not obvious, your application needs to bridge the gap.
For example, if you are moving from retail management into office administration, do not expect the employer to automatically translate your experience. Show the transferable parts clearly: rostering, customer communication, cash handling, reporting, team coordination, supplier contact, complaints, compliance, scheduling, and systems.
If you are moving from overseas experience into the Australian market, make the context easy to understand. Explain company type, industry, scale, and responsibilities in terms an Australian employer can quickly recognise.
If you are stepping up into a more senior role, show evidence of ownership, decision-making, mentoring, stakeholder management, or outcomes beyond task completion.
The question is not whether you personally believe you can do the job. The question is whether your application gives enough evidence for the employer to take that belief seriously.
Candidates sometimes treat practical details as minor. Employers do not.
In Australia, work rights, location, salary expectations, notice period, and availability can influence whether you move forward. That does not mean these factors are more important than skill, but they can become blockers if they are unclear.
If you have full working rights, say so where relevant. If you are on a visa, be accurate and transparent. Do not hide important work rights information and hope it disappears later. It will not. It will simply become a more awkward conversation.
If you are applying interstate or from overseas, explain your relocation plan briefly if needed. Employers can be cautious about relocation because they have seen candidates apply casually without a real move plan.
If salary is requested, avoid giving a number that is wildly disconnected from the market or the role level. You do not have to undervalue yourself, but you do need to be commercially realistic.
If your notice period is long, mention it only when required or when it may affect timing. A long notice period is not always a dealbreaker, but uncertainty around availability can slow things down.
Hiring decisions are not only about whether you are good. They are about whether the hire is practical.
That may sound blunt, but it is how hiring works.
Some Australian job applications, especially in government, education, healthcare, community services, universities, and larger organisations, ask for selection criteria or application questions.
This is where many candidates copy generic statements from their resume and hope for the best. Please do not do that.
Selection criteria are not asking whether you have a skill. They are asking you to prove it.
A strong answer usually includes:
The situation or context
The action you took
The skill or judgement you used
The result or outcome
Why it is relevant to the role
You do not need to write a novel. You do need to provide evidence.
Weak Example
“I have excellent stakeholder management skills and communicate well with different people.”
This is a claim.
Good Example
“In my current role, I coordinate weekly updates between operations, customer service, and finance to resolve order issues. When delays occur, I clarify the issue, confirm ownership, and provide updates to affected stakeholders. This has helped reduce repeated follow-ups and improved visibility across teams.”
This shows behaviour, context, and value.
Employers trust examples more than adjectives. Everyone says they are organised, adaptable, collaborative, and detail-oriented. The candidates who stand out show where those qualities actually appeared at work.
Following up after a job application can be useful, but only if done well. The goal is not to pressure the recruiter. The goal is to politely reinforce your interest and make it easy for them to reconnect your name with your application.
A good follow-up is brief, professional, and specific.
You can follow up if:
The job ad listed a contact person
You had a previous conversation with the recruiter
You submitted an application and the closing date has passed
You were told you would hear back by a certain date
You have relevant new information to add
Avoid following up the day after applying unless there is a strong reason. Recruitment timelines are often slower than candidates expect because approvals, hiring manager availability, internal candidates, budget checks, and shortlist reviews all get involved.
A sensible follow-up might say:
Example
“Hi [Name], I hope you are well. I recently applied for the [Role Title] position and wanted to briefly follow up. The role strongly aligns with my experience in [relevant area], particularly [specific skill or responsibility]. I would be very interested in the opportunity to discuss it further if my background matches what the team is looking for.”
That is enough. No guilt-tripping. No “I have not heard back.” No dramatic essay about how badly you want the role.
Recruiters are not offended by polite follow-up. They are put off by follow-up that sounds impatient, demanding, or completely unaware of hiring timelines.
Australian job ads often contain phrases that sound simple but carry hidden meaning. Learning to read them properly helps you apply more strategically.
When an ad says “fast-paced environment”, it may mean the team handles high volume, changing priorities, lean staffing, or frequent deadlines. Show evidence of workload management, prioritisation, and calm execution.
When an ad says “strong stakeholder management”, it often means the role deals with competing opinions, internal pressure, or people who do not always respond on time. Show examples of communication, negotiation, follow-up, and expectation management.
When an ad says “must be able to work autonomously”, it may mean limited hand-holding. Show evidence of ownership, judgement, and problem-solving.
When an ad says “culture fit”, be careful. Sometimes it means values, communication style, and collaboration. Sometimes it is vague shorthand for whether the hiring manager feels comfortable with you. Your application cannot control every bias in that process, but it can show professionalism, clarity, and alignment with the role.
When an ad says “high attention to detail”, do not submit an application with formatting errors, inconsistent dates, typos, and sloppy file names. That is the recruitment version of bringing an umbrella with holes.
Candidates often look for keywords. Recruiters look for signals. The best applications understand both.
A shortlist is not simply a list of the “best” candidates. It is a list of candidates who appear most relevant, credible, available, and worth interviewing based on the information provided.
To make your application easier to shortlist, your documents should answer the obvious screening questions quickly.
Can the employer see:
What role you are targeting?
Your most relevant experience?
Your current or most recent position?
Your industry background?
Your key technical or functional skills?
Your achievements or impact?
Your work rights if relevant?
Your location or relocation situation if relevant?
Your education, licences, or certifications if required?
Your contact details?
This sounds basic, but many applications fail on basics.
I have seen resumes with no phone number, no location, unclear job dates, unexplained gaps, mismatched job titles, missing qualifications, and summaries so vague they could be used by half the Australian workforce.
A hiring process already has enough friction. Do not make your application another piece of admin for the employer to solve.
There is a common job search panic where candidates start applying for everything. I understand why it happens. Rejection is frustrating. Silence is worse. The natural reaction is to increase volume.
But volume without targeting usually creates more silence.
If you apply for 80 roles with a generic resume, you may feel productive, but you are often just spreading weak applications across the market. A more effective approach is to apply for fewer roles with stronger alignment.
A quality application usually has:
A resume tailored to the role type
Clear evidence against the key requirements
A LinkedIn profile that supports the same positioning
A short cover letter when context is needed
Specific examples in application questions
A realistic match between your experience and the role level
Clean formatting and no avoidable errors
That does not mean you should spend five hours on every application. That is not sustainable. But you should have a strong base resume and then adjust it intelligently.
Think of your job search like positioning, not paperwork.
The employer is not just asking, “Who applied?” They are asking, “Who makes sense for this role?”
Your application needs to make the answer obvious.
Most application mistakes are not dramatic. They are small enough to seem harmless and serious enough to cost interviews.
One common mistake is using the same resume for different job types. If you are applying for administration, customer service, and project support roles with one generic resume, the document may not be strong enough for any of them.
Another mistake is hiding the most relevant experience too low on the page. If the employer needs to reach page two to understand why you fit, you have probably buried the lead.
Candidates also overuse generic soft skills. Communication, teamwork, organisation, and problem-solving matter, but they need context. Where did you use them? With whom? Under what pressure? To achieve what?
Some candidates write too formally and end up sounding unnatural. Others go too casual and weaken their professional credibility. The best tone is clear, direct, and commercially mature.
File names also matter more than people think. “Resume final final new version 3” is not ideal. Use a clean file name such as:
Simar Malhi Resume
Simar Malhi Cover Letter
Simar Malhi Project Coordinator Application
Another mistake is applying when you are clearly outside the role level without explaining the bridge. If you are underqualified, show transferable evidence. If you are overqualified, address motivation and fit carefully. Employers may worry you will get bored, leave quickly, or expect a higher salary.
A strong application reduces doubt before the employer has to ask.
When preparing a job application, use this simple framework before you submit.
Check whether the role genuinely matches your background, goals, salary expectations, location, work rights, and availability. You do not need a perfect match, but you do need a credible one.
Ask yourself: can someone understand my fit in under 30 seconds?
Decide the main message of your application. Are you presenting yourself as an experienced operator, a strong administrator, a project support professional, a customer-focused team leader, a technical specialist, or an emerging graduate?
Do not make the employer guess your professional identity.
Add proof. This includes achievements, systems used, industries worked in, team sizes, customer volumes, project scope, compliance requirements, revenue impact, process improvements, or stakeholder groups.
Proof beats personality claims.
Clean up formatting, job titles, dates, section headings, contact details, and file names. Remove vague language. Make the document easy to scan.
Clarity is underrated because candidates assume hiring teams carefully read everything. They do not. They scan first, then read if the scan earns attention.
Explain anything that may create uncertainty: career change, relocation, employment gap, overseas experience, seniority shift, or return to work. Keep it factual and brief.
Do not let the employer invent a concern that you could have handled in one sentence.
Strong candidates do not always have the most impressive background. They usually present the most relevant case.
They understand the role before applying. They adjust their resume without losing honesty. They use examples instead of empty claims. They make practical details clear. They follow up professionally. They treat the application as the first stage of the interview process.
They also understand that hiring is partly about risk.
Every employer is asking, consciously or not:
Can this person do the job?
Will they understand the environment?
Can they communicate properly?
Are they likely to stay?
Will they need too much support?
Do they solve the problem we are hiring for?
Are there any obvious concerns?
Your application should reduce risk.
That is the real purpose of good job application strategy. It is not about using fancy words or perfect templates. It is about helping the employer feel confident enough to speak with you.
Confidence gets interviews. Confusion gets passed over.
Before submitting a job application in Australia, do a final check from the employer’s perspective.
Read your resume quickly, not carefully. That is how many recruiters will first see it. Can you understand the target role, recent experience, key skills, and value quickly?
Check whether your strongest evidence appears early enough. Make sure your job titles and dates are clear. Remove generic lines that add no meaning. Replace vague claims with practical examples. Confirm your contact details are correct. Make sure your LinkedIn profile does not contradict your resume.
If the job asks for specific information, provide it. If it asks for a cover letter, include one. If it asks for selection criteria, answer them properly. Ignoring instructions is not a power move. It just makes the employer wonder what else you will ignore.
Most importantly, stop writing applications as if the employer has unlimited patience and perfect imagination.
They do not.
Your application has one job: make your fit clear enough that the employer wants a conversation.
Do that consistently, and you will already be ahead of many candidates applying with vague resumes, recycled cover letters, and hope as a strategy.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin