Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeWhen an employer asks about your salary expectations in Australia, the safest answer is not a random number, your current salary, or “I’m flexible.” The best answer gives a researched salary range, confirms you are aligned with the role, and leaves room to discuss the full package, including superannuation, bonus, flexibility, leave, and growth. In practice, I would answer with something like: “Based on the role scope and market range, I’m looking around $95,000 to $105,000 plus super, depending on the overall package and responsibilities.” That answer does three useful things. It shows you have done your homework, it avoids sounding desperate, and it gives the employer enough clarity to decide whether the conversation should continue.
When a recruiter or hiring manager asks, “What are your salary expectations?”, they are not always trying to trap you. Sometimes they are doing something far more boring, which is checking whether the role is financially realistic before everyone spends another three weeks pretending the gap will magically disappear.
In Australian hiring, salary expectations usually means one of four things:
Are you within the approved budget for this role?
Are your expectations realistic for the level of responsibility?
Are you likely to accept the offer if we get to final stage?
Are we about to waste everyone’s time because the salary gap is too large?
This is where candidates often misunderstand the question. They hear it as a test of confidence. Employers usually treat it as a risk check.
A hiring manager does not want to fall in love with a candidate who wants $140,000 when the role has been approved at $110,000 plus super. A recruiter does not want to put forward a candidate whose salary expectations will collapse the offer stage. And candidates should not want to spend their emotional energy interviewing for a job that was never going to meet their financial needs in the first place.
So no, the salary question is not just awkward small talk. It is part of the screening process.
The best answer is a clear, researched salary range with enough flexibility to keep the conversation alive.
A strong answer usually follows this structure:
Confirm your interest in the role
Give a realistic salary range based on market research
Mention that the final number depends on the total package and role scope
Avoid apologising, overexplaining, or sounding unsure
Good Example
“Based on my research and the level of responsibility we’ve discussed, I’m looking at around $100,000 to $110,000 plus super. I’m open to discussing the full package depending on the role scope, flexibility, bonus structure, and growth pathway.”
That is the kind of answer recruiters can actually work with. It is clear, commercially sensible, and not dramatic. Beautifully boring, which is often exactly what works in hiring.
Weak Example
“I’m flexible. I’m happy with whatever you think is fair.”
This sounds polite, but it gives away too much control. It also creates a problem: what the employer thinks is fair may be lower than what the market thinks is fair. Those are not always the same thing.
Weak Example
“I want at least $120,000 because that’s what I need for my lifestyle.”
Your lifestyle may be completely valid, but employers do not price jobs based on your mortgage, rent, childcare costs, or preferred holiday habits. They price roles based on internal budget, market rate, business need, and how much value they believe the role delivers.
The strongest salary answer connects your expectation to the role, not just your personal need.
In most Australian hiring situations, give a range.
A single number can work when you are very clear on your market value and you know the role budget. But for most candidates, a range gives more room to negotiate without sounding vague.
A good range is usually narrow enough to be useful and wide enough to allow movement. For example:
$85,000 to $95,000 plus super
$110,000 to $120,000 plus super
$140,000 to $155,000 plus super
A range like $80,000 to $130,000 is too wide. It tells the recruiter you have not anchored yourself properly. It also creates a very predictable problem: the employer hears the lowest number and quietly parks their offer there.
This is one of the hiring realities candidates do not always like hearing. If you give a range, many employers will remember the bottom of the range. Not because they are evil villains sitting in a boardroom stroking a cat, but because salary negotiation is still a commercial conversation.
That means your lower number must be something you would genuinely consider accepting.
Do not say $90,000 to $100,000 if you would feel resentful at $90,000. Say $95,000 to $105,000 or $100,000 to $110,000 if that is closer to your real expectation.
Before you answer the salary question, you need three numbers.
This is the lowest package you would accept without regret. It should be based on your financial needs, market value, commute, flexibility, workload, and whether the role genuinely improves your career.
Be honest with yourself here. Candidates often set a minimum in theory and then panic when an offer appears. If you know you would be unhappy below $95,000 plus super, do not tell the recruiter you are open from $85,000.
That is not flexibility. That is self sabotage wearing a nice shirt.
This is the salary you are aiming for based on the role, your experience, current market conditions, and the value you bring.
Your target should be realistic, but not timid. A good target sits in the zone where you can confidently explain why it makes sense.
For example:
“I’m targeting around $115,000 plus super because the role seems to involve stakeholder management, reporting ownership, and process improvement, not just execution.”
That answer works because it links the number to responsibility.
This is the higher number you would love to achieve if the role scope, urgency, market demand, or package supports it.
You do not always need to mention your stretch number early. But you should know it before negotiation starts.
This is especially important if the role expands during the interview process. Sometimes a job ad looks like one role, then the interview reveals it is actually one role plus half of another person’s job plus “wearing many hats”, which is often employer language for “we have not fully resourced this properly.”
When the responsibility grows, your salary expectation should not stay frozen.
Recruiters usually ask salary expectations early because they need to know whether there is a workable match. This is normal.
A strong answer is direct but not rigid.
Good Example
“I’m currently exploring roles around $95,000 to $105,000 plus super, depending on the full package and scope. Does that sit within the range for this role?”
This answer is useful because it gives your range and asks for alignment. You are not just throwing a number into the air and hoping it lands somewhere friendly.
If the recruiter says the budget is lower, ask a practical follow up:
“Thanks for letting me know. Can I ask what range has been approved for the role?”
That question is fair. It also stops you from negotiating against yourself.
If the range is too low, you can respond professionally:
“That may be below what I’m targeting for my next move, but I’d still be open to understanding the full package and responsibilities before deciding.”
This keeps the door open without pretending salary does not matter. Salary does matter. Everyone knows it. We can stop performing the little theatre where candidates act like they are only motivated by passion and employers act like budgets are a sacred mystery.
When the hiring manager asks, your answer should connect more strongly to the actual role.
By that stage, you may know more about the team, expectations, workload, systems, reporting lines, and performance goals. Use that information.
Good Example
“Based on what we’ve discussed, the role seems to cover team leadership, stakeholder management, and ownership of reporting improvements. For that level of responsibility, I’d be looking around $120,000 to $130,000 plus super, depending on the full package.”
This answer is stronger than simply saying:
“I want $125,000.”
The first version shows your thinking. The second version gives a number without context.
Hiring managers are more likely to respect a number when they understand how you arrived at it. They may not agree, but at least they can see the logic.
Sometimes employers do not disclose salary in the job ad. This is still common in Australia, despite candidates being understandably tired of salary hide and seek.
If you do not know the range, do not guess blindly. Ask for the budget before giving a firm answer.
Good Example
“I’d like to make sure we’re aligned before I give a number. Can you share the approved salary range for the role?”
If they push back and ask you to go first, give a researched range:
“From what I’ve seen in the market for similar roles in Australia, I’d expect this type of position to sit around $90,000 to $100,000 plus super, depending on the scope. Is that aligned with your budget?”
This answer does not sound evasive. It sounds informed.
The trick is not to refuse to answer. The trick is to avoid answering in a way that weakens your position.
In Australia, always be clear whether you are talking about salary plus super or a total package including super.
This matters because $100,000 plus super and $100,000 including super are not the same thing.
When candidates and employers use different assumptions, confusion starts. And by confusion, I mean the candidate thinks they are getting one number, the employer means another, and everyone suddenly becomes very precise at the offer stage. Funny how that happens.
Use clear language:
“I’m looking for $100,000 plus super.”
“I’d be targeting a package around $115,000 including super.”
“Can you confirm whether that figure is base salary plus super or total package?”
For most professional roles, I prefer candidates to speak in base salary plus super unless the employer has clearly framed the role as a total remuneration package. This keeps the conversation cleaner.
If the employer gives a package figure, ask what the base salary is. Do not wait until the contract arrives to realise the number looked better in conversation than it does on paper.
You do not need to base your salary expectations only on your current salary.
This is one of the biggest mistakes I see candidates make. They treat their current pay as the ceiling, when it may simply be evidence that they are underpaid.
Employers often ask what you are currently earning because it gives them an anchor. Sometimes it is innocent. Sometimes it is strategic. Either way, your current salary does not automatically define your next salary.
A better answer is:
“My current salary does not fully reflect the level I’m targeting in my next move. Based on the market and the responsibilities of this role, I’m looking around $100,000 to $110,000 plus super.”
That answer redirects the conversation from past pay to future value.
If you are currently underpaid, do not announce it like a confession.
Weak Example
“I’m only on $78,000 now, so I guess anything above that would be good.”
That tells the employer they may not need to offer market rate to win you.
Good Example
“For my next role, I’m focusing on market alignment and role scope. I’m looking around $90,000 to $100,000 plus super.”
You are allowed to grow. Your salary can grow with you. Revolutionary concept, apparently.
If your expectations are higher than the advertised range, you need to decide whether there is a real reason to continue.
Sometimes it is worth having the conversation if:
The role scope is broader than advertised
The employer has flexibility for the right candidate
There are bonuses, commissions, allowances, or strong benefits
The title is lower than the actual responsibility
The role could evolve quickly
You are genuinely interested despite the gap
But do not ignore a major salary mismatch and hope it disappears. It usually returns at offer stage wearing heavier boots.
A good response is:
“I noticed the advertised range is up to $100,000 plus super. I’m currently targeting closer to $115,000 plus super for my next move. Is there flexibility in the budget for someone with my background, or is the range fixed?”
This is professional and honest. It gives the employer a chance to clarify.
If they say the range is fixed, believe them unless there is clear evidence otherwise. Some candidates waste weeks trying to negotiate a budget that was never flexible. Confidence is useful. Delusion is not a strategy.
For Australian public sector roles, including APS and many state government positions, salary expectations work differently because pay bands, classifications, and enterprise agreements often define the range more tightly.
In these roles, your answer should show that you understand the classification structure.
Good Example
“My expectation is aligned with the advertised APS level and salary band. I’d be looking to be placed appropriately within the range based on my relevant experience and the scope of the role.”
For APS roles, you usually have less room to negotiate outside the band, but there may be some room within the band depending on agency rules, experience, and approval processes.
This is different from private sector negotiation, where the employer may have more discretion. In public sector hiring, you are often negotiating placement within a structure, not inventing a new salary range from scratch.
That means you should not answer like this:
Weak Example
“I know the band says $92,000 to $105,000, but I’m looking for $130,000.”
Unless there is another classification level available, that answer usually tells the panel there is a mismatch.
A better approach is to ask:
“Is there flexibility to appoint at a higher point within the band based on directly relevant experience?”
That is a much more realistic public sector salary question.
Career changers and return to work candidates often struggle with salary expectations because their experience does not fit neatly into one box.
The mistake is assuming you must discount yourself heavily because your background is not linear.
You may need to adjust your salary expectations if you are entering a new field, but you should not ignore transferable value. Employers still care about communication, stakeholder management, commercial judgement, systems knowledge, leadership, problem solving, compliance, customer experience, and operational maturity.
A strong answer might sound like:
“Because I’m transitioning into this area, I’m realistic that the salary needs to reflect the learning curve. Based on my transferable experience and the role scope, I’d be looking around $80,000 to $90,000 plus super.”
This works because it acknowledges the transition without sounding apologetic.
For return to work candidates:
“I’m looking at roles around $85,000 to $95,000 plus super, depending on the scope. My focus is on finding the right long term fit, but I also want the salary to reflect the level of responsibility.”
Do not overexplain your break unless it is relevant. Salary is about role value, market value, and capability. It is not a moral judgement on your career timeline.
If you are new to the Australian market, salary expectations can be especially difficult because overseas titles and salary levels do not always translate cleanly.
This is where research matters. Do not rely only on what you earned overseas. Compare:
Australian job ads for similar roles
Salary guides
Recruiter conversations
Industry associations
LinkedIn job postings
SEEK salary information
People working in similar roles locally
The main risk for migrants is underselling themselves because they are unsure how Australian employers evaluate overseas experience. The second risk is overpricing themselves because the title looks similar but the local market expects different systems, regulations, stakeholder exposure, or industry knowledge.
A balanced answer is:
“I’m still calibrating against the Australian market, but based on similar roles and the level of responsibility, I’m targeting around $95,000 to $105,000 plus super. I’m open to discussing where my background fits within your range.”
That answer is honest, but still confident.
Do not say:
“I don’t know Australian salaries, so whatever is normal.”
That gives away too much control. You can be new to the market without handing the employer a blank cheque.
Online forms are annoying because they often force you to enter a number before you have any context. Applicant tracking systems are not known for emotional nuance. Shocking, I know.
If the form allows text, use a range:
“$95,000 to $105,000 plus super, depending on role scope and total package.”
If it forces one number, use a number close to your target, not your minimum.
For example, if your acceptable range is $95,000 to $105,000 plus super, you may enter $100,000 or $105,000 depending on how competitive your profile is and how strongly you match the role.
If the form asks for current salary, and it is optional, you can leave it blank. If it is required, decide whether you are comfortable providing it. Where possible, redirect to expectations:
“Seeking $100,000 plus super based on role scope.”
The practical reality is that some systems are clumsy. But recruiters do read context when it is available. Your goal is to avoid entering a number that screens you out unfairly or anchors you too low.
Good Example
“I’m looking around $100,000 to $110,000 plus super, depending on the full package and responsibilities. I’m open to discussing this once I understand the role in more detail.”
Why this works: You give clarity without locking yourself into one number too early.
Good Example
“I’d like to make sure we’re aligned. Could you share the approved salary range for the role?”
Why this works: It is direct, reasonable, and does not sound defensive.
Good Example
“That is slightly below what I’m targeting, but I’m open to understanding the full package, flexibility, and growth pathway before making a decision.”
Why this works: You do not reject the role too early, but you signal that salary still matters.
Good Example
“I’m genuinely interested in the role. Based on the responsibilities and my background, I’d be comfortable accepting at $115,000 plus super. Is there room to move closer to that?”
Why this works: It is clear and respectful. It also gives the employer something specific to respond to.
Good Example
“I’d prefer to focus on the salary expectation for this role rather than my current package. Based on the market and the responsibilities, I’m looking around $105,000 to $115,000 plus super.”
Why this works: You redirect without sounding difficult.
Good Example
“I’m happy to discuss salary. At this stage, I’d like to understand the role scope a little better, but based on similar roles I’d expect something around $90,000 to $100,000 plus super.”
Why this works: You answer the question while protecting yourself from premature anchoring.
Flexibility is useful. Vagueness is not.
If you say you are flexible, many employers hear that your expectations are lower or movable. If you have a firm minimum, say it professionally.
A better phrase is:
“I have some flexibility depending on the full package, but I’m generally targeting around $100,000 plus super.”
That sounds cooperative without sounding like you can be talked down easily.
Your minimum is your walk away point. It is not your opening position.
If your minimum is $90,000 and your target is $100,000, do not open with $90,000 unless you are genuinely happy to land there. Many candidates accidentally negotiate themselves down before the employer has even made an offer.
Always clarify whether the number includes super or is plus super. This is one of the most common sources of salary confusion in Australia.
A role advertised as $110,000 package is not the same as $110,000 plus super.
Salary matters, but so do the details around it.
Consider:
Superannuation
Bonus
Commission
Car allowance
Remote or hybrid work
Additional leave
Overtime expectations
On call requirements
Professional development
Career progression
Travel requirements
Job security
A lower salary with strong flexibility may be worth more to some candidates than a higher salary with long hours, poor leadership, and a commute that slowly destroys the soul.
But do not let “great culture” replace fair pay. Culture does not pay rent. Very rude of it, really.
Candidates sometimes overexplain because they feel awkward discussing money.
You do not need to justify every dollar. Keep your answer calm and commercial.
Say:
“Based on the role scope, I’m targeting $105,000 to $115,000 plus super.”
Do not say:
“I know this might sound like a lot, and I’m sorry if it’s too high, but I was hoping maybe somewhere around…”
No. Stop handing the employer reasons to doubt your number.
This is the behind the scenes part candidates often do not see.
When you give your salary expectations, the recruiter or hiring manager usually compares your answer against:
Approved budget
Internal salary bands
Current team salaries
Market rates
Your level of experience
How urgent the vacancy is
How difficult the role has been to fill
How strong the candidate shortlist is
Whether you are a first choice or backup candidate
Whether your expectations create internal equity issues
That last point matters. Sometimes an employer can afford your number but still cannot offer it because it would create problems with existing employees in similar roles. This is not always fair, but it is real.
There is also a difference between being expensive and being overpriced.
Expensive means you cost more, but the employer sees the value.
Overpriced means your expectation does not match the level they see.
Your job is not to be the cheapest candidate. Your job is to make your salary expectation feel commercially reasonable for the value you bring.
That happens through how you position your experience, achievements, role fit, and understanding of the job.
Use this framework before any interview where salary may come up.
Look at Australian salary guides, job ads, industry reports, recruiter insights, and salary tools. Do not rely on one source. Salary data is often imperfect because job titles vary wildly.
A “Marketing Manager” in one company may manage a team, budget, strategy, campaigns, agencies, reporting, and executive stakeholders. In another company, it may mean one person posting on LinkedIn and being asked to “make it go viral.” Same title, very different salary logic.
Set your minimum, target, and stretch number before the call. Do not invent your expectations while your brain is in interview mode.
Decide whether you are discussing base plus super or total package. Say it clearly.
Do not just state the number. Connect it to the responsibilities, market rate, and your background.
This matters more than candidates realise. Say your range, then stop talking.
Many candidates panic in the silence and start discounting themselves.
“I’m looking for $110,000 plus super… but I’m flexible… and obviously I understand budgets… and I’d consider less…”
That is not negotiation. That is a live auction where you are bidding against yourself.
Say the number. Let them respond.
Here is a strong all purpose answer you can adapt:
“Based on the role scope and current market range for similar positions in Australia, I’m looking around $100,000 to $110,000 plus super. I do have some flexibility depending on the full package, responsibilities, flexibility, and growth opportunities, but that is the range I’m targeting for my next move.”
This answer works because it is clear, realistic, and professional. It does not sound arrogant. It does not sound desperate. It gives the employer enough information while still leaving room for discussion.
If you want a shorter version, use this:
“I’m targeting around $100,000 to $110,000 plus super, depending on the full package and role scope.”
That is enough in most conversations.
The best salary expectation answer is not the one that gets you through the interview by avoiding discomfort. It is the one that protects your value, keeps the process honest, and helps both sides decide whether the opportunity actually makes sense.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin