Use ATS-optimised CV and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our CV builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your CV faster.
Portfolio-Only Statements
Statements like “Designed cohesive interfaces for multiple platforms” fail because ATS cannot detect systemic contributions without explicit terms such as “component documentation” or “library standardization.”
•
Tool Listing Without Context
Listing Figma, Sketch, or Storybook without connecting them to system-level deliverables reduces semantic weight.
•
Missing Cross-Team Signals
Lack of explicit collaboration with engineering or product teams diminishes perceived seniority in the ATS parsing logic.
Portfolios do not improve ATS ranking. Mentioning systemic validation (e.g., “interactive component library tested across teams”) strengthens human review. Links alone carry no ATS value.
ATS-Optimized Resume Content Example for Design Systems Designer (United States)
Professional Summary
Design Systems Designer with 5+ years of experience building scalable component libraries and design tokens for enterprise web and mobile platforms. Expert in atomic design, pattern libraries, cross-functional documentation, and version-controlled system updates. Proven ability to improve UI consistency, reduce development time, and collaborate closely with engineering and product teams using Figma, Storybook, and Sketch.
Does omitting “Design Systems Designer” in the title reduce ATS score?
Yes. ATS systems heavily weight exact title matches and related system-specific terminology.
Should atomic design or component libraries be repeatedly mentioned?
Yes. Multiple contextual uses tied to measurable outcomes improve ranking in ATS parsing.
Can tool-heavy statements improve ATS outcomes alone?
No. Tools must be tied to system-level deliverables (e.g., Figma for component documentation) to be ATS-relevant.
Is linking to a design system portfolio sufficient for ATS scoring?
No. ATS cannot parse portfolio content; textual evidence of system ownership is required.
Do generic UX achievements help?
Only if framed within system-level impact; otherwise, they dilute ATS relevance.
An ATS resume for design systems designer is evaluated primarily on semantic clarity around system-level design capabilities, tool mastery, and measurable impact on consistency and scalability across digital products. Modern ATS pipelines prioritize structured keywords, contextual evidence of design system ownership, and integration with engineering workflows over visual sophistication or portfolio aesthetics.
Rejection often stems from implied expertise rather than explicit demonstration of system-level contributions.
Parsing Signals That Matter for Design Systems Designers
ATS systems do not infer hierarchy or process; they scan for role-aligned terminology and outcome-oriented statements. For design systems designer roles, the strongest signals include:
•Explicit job title “Design Systems Designer”
•Component and pattern library ownership (atomic design, reusable components)
Upload CV
Import from Linkedin
