Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeThe average salary in the UK depends on which “average” you mean. The most useful figure for most job seekers is the median full time salary, because it shows the middle point of earnings rather than being pulled upwards by very high earners. In 2025, the UK median full time annual salary was around £39,039 before tax. That does not mean £39k is automatically “good”, underpaid, or overpaid. Salary only makes sense when you compare it with your role, sector, location, experience level, working pattern, and the market rate for your skills. As a recruiter, I see candidates get salary benchmarking wrong all the time because they compare themselves to a national figure instead of the salary range employers are actually using for their type of role.
The average UK salary is usually discussed in two ways: median salary and mean salary.
The median salary is the middle salary when all salaries are lined up from lowest to highest. This is usually the better benchmark for candidates because it is less distorted by very high salaries at the top.
The mean salary is the total of all salaries divided by the number of people. This can be useful for broad economic analysis, but it can make the typical worker look better paid than they really are because high earners pull the number upwards.
That is why, when someone asks “What is the average salary in the UK?”, I usually want to know what they are really trying to work out.
Are they asking:
Am I underpaid?
Is this job offer fair?
What salary should I ask for?
What is normal for my age or experience?
Is £30k, £40k, £50k or £60k a good salary in the UK?
The most useful broad benchmark is this: the UK median full time salary is around £39k before tax.
That gives you a starting point, but not the full story.
A salary around the UK median may indicate a solid full time income, but whether it is competitive depends heavily on your circumstances. For example, a candidate earning £39k in an early career operations role may be doing well. A candidate earning £39k as a senior software engineer, qualified finance professional, experienced project manager, or specialist sales leader is likely underpaid.
This is why I would never advise a candidate to negotiate purely from the national average. Employers do not usually set salary bands by saying, “The UK average is £39k, so let us pay that.” They set salary bands based on the role’s value to the business, internal equity, market competition, location, seniority, and budget constraints.
The national average helps you understand the wider labour market. It does not tell you what your role is worth.
A more useful way to think about salary is:
National benchmark: where your pay sits compared with the wider UK workforce
Role benchmark: where your pay sits compared with people doing similar work
Sector benchmark: how your industry pays compared with others
Should I move jobs to increase my pay?
Those are better questions. The national average gives context, but it does not make a salary decision for you.
In the UK job market, salary is not judged in isolation. A £38k salary might be strong for one role and weak for another. A £45k salary might be excellent in one region and fairly ordinary in London. A £55k salary might be generous in a generalist role and below market in a specialist technical role.
This is where candidates often get misled. They see one national figure and treat it like a universal scoreboard. Hiring does not work like that. Salary is priced by market demand, business need, budget approval, replacement cost, and how hard the role is to fill. Not by whether someone feels “above average” after reading a statistic.
Location benchmark: how your region affects pay expectations
Seniority benchmark: whether your responsibility level matches your salary
Offer benchmark: whether a specific employer is paying fairly for the role they want filled
That last one matters more than candidates realise. A company may want senior level output but only have mid level budget. That is not a “market problem”. That is a hiring mismatch. It happens often, and candidates should learn to spot it.
A good salary in the UK is not just a number. It is a number that makes sense for your role, location, experience, living costs, and career stage.
That said, here is a realistic way to interpret common UK salary levels.
£30k can be a good salary for early career professionals, entry level office roles, some administrative positions, junior marketing roles, customer service team roles, graduate schemes outside high paying sectors, and some public sector or charity roles.
But £30k becomes less competitive if the role requires specialist skills, several years of experience, leadership responsibility, revenue ownership, technical expertise, or London commuting costs.
Recruiter reality: when an employer advertises a role at £30k but asks for five years of experience, advanced Excel, stakeholder management, reporting, client handling, and “ability to work independently from day one”, I immediately see the problem. They are not hiring an entry level candidate. They are trying to buy experience at junior pricing. Candidates need to be able to recognise that.
£40k is around the median full time salary level, so it is often viewed as a solid UK salary. For many professionals, it represents a stable mid career income.
It can be good for roles such as experienced administrators, coordinators, HR advisors, marketing executives, account managers, junior project managers, analysts, and some public sector professionals.
But £40k may be low for senior specialists, managers with direct reports, technical professionals, experienced recruiters, qualified finance roles, software developers, data professionals, or commercial roles carrying revenue targets.
The mistake candidates make is assuming that because £40k is around the average, it must be fair. Sometimes it is. Sometimes it is a company hoping the word “competitive” will do a lot of unpaid labour.
£50k is above the broad UK median and is generally a good salary in many parts of the UK. It often appears in mid senior professional roles, management positions, specialist roles, technical jobs, finance, sales, project delivery, compliance, product, and some consulting roles.
However, context still matters. In London, £50k can disappear faster than candidates expect once rent, commuting, tax, pension contributions, childcare, and general living costs are involved. In other parts of the UK, £50k can feel significantly stronger.
Recruiter view: £50k is often the salary point where employers start expecting clearer evidence of impact. They are less impressed by task lists and more interested in outcomes. They want to see ownership, problem solving, judgement, stakeholder influence, revenue impact, cost saving, process improvement, or technical depth.
£60k is a strong salary in many UK markets, especially outside London and the South East. It usually indicates seniority, specialist expertise, management responsibility, commercial accountability, or high demand skills.
But £60k is not automatically “senior” in every field. In some technology, legal, finance, consulting, sales, product, engineering, and leadership roles, £60k may sit closer to mid level depending on the company and market.
This is where salary conversations become more strategic. At £60k and above, employers are usually not just buying effort. They are buying judgement. They expect you to make decisions, reduce risk, handle ambiguity, influence others, and create measurable value.
If your CV or interview answers still sound like a list of duties, you may struggle to justify higher salary expectations even if you are capable of the job.
The average salary is useful, but it can also create false confidence or unnecessary panic.
I see both.
Some candidates earn below the average and assume they are failing. They are not always failing. They may be early in their career, working part time, based in a lower paying region, in a lower margin sector, or building experience before moving into a higher paying role.
Other candidates earn above the average and assume they are well paid. Not necessarily. If your role is significantly under market for your skill set, being above the national average does not protect you from being underpaid.
This is the part most salary articles do not explain properly: salary is not only about what people earn. It is about what employers are willing to pay to solve a specific business problem.
A general average cannot capture that.
For example, two people earning £42k may be in very different positions:
Candidate A is in a stable operations role with limited progression but strong work life balance
Candidate B is a technical specialist in a high demand market and could earn £55k elsewhere
Same salary. Completely different market position.
That is why salary benchmarking should never stop at the national average. The better question is not “Am I above average?” It is “Am I being paid appropriately for the value, scarcity, complexity, and responsibility of my role?”
Salary conversations are rarely as simple as candidates think.
When a recruiter asks about your salary expectations, they are usually trying to work out several things at once:
Are you aligned with the employer’s budget?
Do you understand your market value?
Are your expectations realistic for the role level?
Would accepting this salary make sense for you long term?
Are you likely to reject the offer later?
Are there hidden issues around bonus, benefits, flexibility, commute, or progression?
Recruiters are not always trying to “catch you out”. But they are trying to avoid wasting time on a process that collapses at offer stage.
Here is the behind the scenes reality: salary mismatches are one of the most common reasons hiring processes fall apart. Sometimes the candidate is unrealistic. Sometimes the employer is underpaying. Sometimes both sides avoid being honest early enough, then everyone acts surprised at the end. Very theatrical. Rarely productive.
A strong candidate does not need to reveal every private financial detail. But they do need to show they understand the market.
A better answer sounds like:
Good Example: “For this type of role, based on the level of responsibility and the current UK market, I would expect something in the region of £45k to £50k. I would look at the full package, but I would want the base salary to reflect the scope of the role.”
That answer is calm, informed, and flexible without sounding vague.
A weaker answer sounds like:
Weak Example: “I just want as much as possible.”
Understandable? Yes. Useful? No.
Another weak answer:
Weak Example: “I saw online that the UK average salary is about £39k, so I think I should get at least that.”
That is not a salary argument. That is a statistic looking for a job.
Salary often rises with experience, but not automatically. Time served does not guarantee higher pay. Employers pay for useful experience, not just years survived in an office with fluorescent lighting and questionable coffee.
Career stage is a better lens than age alone.
Early career salaries in the UK often sit below the national full time median. This includes graduates, trainees, junior administrators, assistants, coordinators, entry level analysts, and people moving into a new field.
At this stage, employers usually assess:
Potential
Communication
Learning speed
Basic technical ability
Reliability
Motivation
Evidence of initiative
The salary may not be high yet, but the important question is whether the role builds skills that will increase your market value. A low salary with strong training and progression can sometimes be better than a slightly higher salary in a dead end role. Not always, but sometimes.
Candidates should be careful with roles that offer low pay and vague promises. “Great exposure” can mean genuine learning. It can also mean “we have no structure and you will be doing three jobs badly supported”. Ask proper questions.
Mid career is where salary differences become much more visible. Some people move quickly because they specialise, negotiate well, change companies strategically, or work in high demand sectors. Others stagnate because they stay loyal to employers that reward loyalty with warm words and a 2 percent increase.
At mid career level, employers usually want proof that you can do more than complete tasks. They want evidence of:
Ownership
Problem solving
Stakeholder management
Commercial awareness
Technical competence
Process improvement
Measurable contribution
Ability to work without constant supervision
This is where candidates should become more deliberate about salary benchmarking. You should know what similar roles pay, what skills are pushing salaries up, and whether your current employer is keeping pace with the market.
Senior salaries vary widely across the UK. A senior title does not always mean senior pay, and senior pay does not always come with a sensible workload. Both things need checking.
At senior level, employers pay for judgement, influence, risk management, leadership, strategic thinking, and the ability to deliver through others.
The common mistake is assuming that a senior job title alone justifies a higher salary. It helps, but hiring managers will still ask: what decisions did you make, what changed because of your work, what risks did you reduce, what results did you improve, and who trusted you to lead?
If you want senior pay, your positioning needs to show senior value.
The UK salary market is not one market. It is several overlapping markets.
London salaries are often higher, but so are costs. The South East can also command higher pay in many sectors. Major cities such as Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Edinburgh and Glasgow have strong professional markets, but salary levels still vary by industry and role type.
Remote work has changed this slightly, but not as much as some candidates hoped. Many employers still use location based salary bands. Some pay London rates only if the role is London based or requires regular office attendance. Others use national bands. Some use hybrid models. Some appear to make it up as they go along, which is not ideal, but it is also not rare.
When assessing whether your salary is good, ask:
Is the role London based, regional, hybrid, remote, or national?
Does the salary reflect commuting costs?
Is the employer paying for the role location or your home location?
Are similar roles in your region paying more?
Would you need to move jobs or locations to increase salary?
Is flexibility compensating for lower pay, or is it being used as an excuse to underpay?
That last point matters. Flexibility has value, but it should not become a magic wand employers wave over a weak salary package.
Two candidates can have similar experience levels and completely different earning potential because they work in different industries.
Higher paying UK sectors often include finance, technology, legal services, pharmaceuticals, energy, consulting, engineering, specialist sales, and senior commercial roles. Lower paying sectors often include parts of hospitality, retail, care, administration, charity, and some public service roles, though there are exceptions within each.
The reason is not always fairness. It is usually a mix of revenue, margins, skills scarcity, regulation, funding models, competition, and how close the role is to profit, risk, or operational necessity.
This matters because candidates sometimes blame themselves for earning less when they are actually in a lower paying sector. Personal performance matters, but sector economics matter too.
If you want a significant salary increase, you may need one of three moves:
Move to a higher paying employer within your sector
Move into a better paid specialism
Move into a sector that pays more for your existing skills
For example, an administrator in a small local business may be underpaid compared with an executive assistant in financial services. A general marketing executive may earn less than a performance marketing specialist. A customer support professional may increase pay by moving into customer success, account management, implementation, or operations.
That is not “career advice fluff”. That is how salary mobility often works in practice. Pay rises usually come from changing the value equation, not just asking nicely once a year and hoping your manager has a generous spiritual awakening.
You may be underpaid if your salary is below the market rate for your role, responsibilities, experience, and location.
The signs are often clearer than people think.
You may be underpaid if:
Similar job adverts are consistently offering more for the same work
Recruiters regularly approach you about roles with higher salary ranges
Your responsibilities have grown but your salary has not
You are training or supervising people who earn close to your salary
Your title is junior but your workload is not
Your employer avoids salary conversations with vague language
You have not had a meaningful pay review despite strong performance
Your role is hard to replace but your pay does not reflect that
One warning: do not rely on one job advert. Salary ranges online can be messy. Some are inflated to attract applicants. Some are outdated. Some include bonuses. Some are suspiciously vague because the employer wants flexibility, which usually means flexibility in their favour.
Look for patterns. If several credible roles show higher pay for similar responsibilities, that is useful evidence.
Also compare scope, not just title. A “Marketing Manager” in one company may manage campaigns. In another, they manage brand, budget, agencies, strategy, analytics, events, content, and three people. Same title. Different job. Different salary expectation.
Average salary data is useful in negotiation, but only if you use it properly.
Do not walk into a salary conversation saying, “The average salary in the UK is £39k, so I want more.” That is too broad. It does not connect your request to the role.
A stronger negotiation uses market evidence and role value.
You want to connect:
The role scope
Your relevant experience
The market rate
The salary range for similar jobs
The value you bring
The risk the employer reduces by hiring you
For example:
Good Example: “Based on the scope of the role, the level of stakeholder management involved, and comparable UK roles I have seen in this market, I would be looking for £48k to £52k. That feels aligned with the responsibility level and the experience I would bring.”
This works because it sounds grounded. You are not demanding a random number. You are showing commercial judgement.
A weaker version:
Weak Example: “I need £52k because my rent has gone up.”
That may be true, and I sympathise, but employers do not usually price roles around your personal bills. They price roles around business value and market rate. Your personal cost of living may influence what you can accept, but it is not the strongest negotiation argument.
A better internal rule is: know your walk away number, your target number, and your strong but realistic number.
Your walk away number is the lowest salary that makes sense for you. Your target number is the salary you would feel happy accepting. Your strong but realistic number is the upper end you can justify based on the role and market.
“Competitive salary” is one of the most overused phrases in UK job adverts.
Sometimes it genuinely means the employer is flexible and willing to pay for the right person. Sometimes it means they do not want competitors to see their salary range. Sometimes it means the salary is not competitive at all and they know candidates would scroll past if they published it.
Here is how I interpret vague salary language.
“Competitive salary” often means: “We want to discuss expectations before revealing the budget.”
“Dependent on experience” often means: “We have a range, but we want to see how cheaply we can hire without losing quality.”
“Excellent benefits package” can mean: “The base salary may not be the strongest, so please admire the fruit basket.”
“Great progression opportunity” can mean: “The salary may be lower now, but we want you to believe it will improve later.”
“Fast paced environment” can mean: “The workload may be heavy and priorities may change constantly.”
None of these phrases are automatically bad. But candidates should not accept vague language at face value. Ask for the salary range early.
A professional way to ask is:
Good Example: “Before progressing, could you share the approved salary range for the role? I want to make sure we are aligned before investing time in the process.”
That is reasonable. It saves everyone time. Any employer acting offended by that question is giving you useful information, even if they did not mean to.
A fair job offer is not just about whether the salary is above or below the UK average. It is about whether the offer matches the role, market, responsibilities, expectations, and total package.
When reviewing an offer, look at:
Base salary
Bonus or commission
Pension contribution
Annual leave
Private healthcare
Flexible working
Remote or hybrid arrangement
Commuting cost
Working hours
Overtime expectations
Training budget
Promotion pathway
Probation terms
Notice period
Job security
Management quality
Workload realism
A £45k role with strong flexibility, healthy management, realistic workload, and progression may be better than a £50k role with chaos, burnout, and a manager who treats planning as a personality defect.
But do not let employers use benefits to distract from a weak base salary. Benefits matter, but base salary affects mortgage applications, pension contributions, future salary negotiations, redundancy pay, and your long term earning trajectory.
Recruiter observation: candidates often focus too much on the first offer number and not enough on what that number positions them for next. Your current salary can influence future offers, especially when recruiters or employers ask about expectations. The stronger your salary foundation, the easier it is to move upwards later.
To benchmark your salary properly, do not rely on one source. Build a realistic picture.
Use:
Current job adverts for similar roles
Salary guides from credible recruiters
ONS salary data for national context
Conversations with recruiters in your sector
Industry reports
Professional communities
Former colleagues where appropriate
Your own interview activity and offer feedback
The strongest evidence comes from live market behaviour. If employers are interviewing candidates at £55k for roles like yours, that matters. If recruiters keep contacting you about roles £10k higher than your current salary, that matters. If every job advert at your level pays the same as your current role, that also matters, even if you wish it did not.
When benchmarking, compare:
Job title
Actual responsibilities
Sector
Company size
Region
Required experience
Management responsibility
Technical skills
Revenue or budget ownership
Regulatory or risk responsibility
Do not compare your salary with someone’s LinkedIn brag, anonymous forum comment, or “my mate earns £90k doing nothing” story. Those stories are often missing context, exaggerated, or attached to one very specific set of circumstances.
Salary benchmarking should make you clearer, not more chaotic.
If your salary is below the UK average, do not panic. First, diagnose why.
Your salary may be below average because:
You are early in your career
You work part time
You are in a lower paying sector
You are in a region with lower pay
You recently changed career
You have not negotiated
You stayed too long in one company
Your employer is genuinely underpaying
Your role title does not reflect your actual responsibility
Each reason requires a different response.
If you are early career, focus on skill growth and role progression. If you are in a lower paying sector, consider whether you want to move sector or specialise. If you have stayed too long, test the external market. If your responsibilities have grown, prepare a business case for a pay review. If your employer is underpaying and unwilling to discuss it, your strongest pay rise may come from leaving.
That last point is uncomfortable but true. Internal pay rises are often limited by salary bands, annual budgets, and internal politics. External moves can reset your market value faster because the new employer is pricing the role based on current need, not your historical salary.
This is why loyal employees sometimes become underpaid without realising it. The market moves. Their salary does not. Then the company hires someone externally on more money and everyone acts shocked when morale drops. I have seen this film. The ending is rarely mysterious.
Here is the framework I would use if you are trying to understand or improve your salary position in the UK job market.
Do not rely only on your job title. Write down what you actually do, what decisions you make, who depends on your work, what risks you manage, and what outcomes you influence.
Look at current UK job adverts that match your actual responsibilities, not just your title. Save the salary ranges. Look for patterns across several employers.
Feeling underpaid may be valid, but negotiation needs evidence. Build your case around market rate, responsibility, performance, and value.
Sometimes the salary is the problem. Sometimes the bigger problem is that your role is not developing your value. A pay rise helps today. Better positioning helps your next three moves.
Your options are usually:
Ask for a pay review
Apply externally
Move into a higher paying specialism
Change sector
Build evidence for promotion
Improve your CV positioning
Strengthen interview examples
Get clearer on your salary expectations
Do not sit in vague frustration for two years. That is not a strategy. That is just resentment with a Teams calendar.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Flexibility and working pattern
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin