Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA strong supporting statement shows how your experience matches the role criteria, not just why you want the job. In the UK job market, especially for NHS, council, university, charity, education, civil service, and public sector applications, the supporting statement is often the part that decides whether you are shortlisted. The best examples are specific, evidence based, structured around the person specification, and written in a way that makes the recruiter’s job easy. A weak statement says, “I am passionate and hardworking.” A strong one proves it with relevant examples, outcomes, judgement, and clear alignment to the role.
This is where many candidates quietly lose the application. Not because they are unsuitable, but because they write a personal summary when the employer asked for evidence.
A supporting statement is not a cover letter with a different name. It is not a motivational essay. It is not a place to repeat your CV in paragraph form and hope someone connects the dots.
A supporting statement is your written evidence against the role requirements.
When I screen applications, I am usually asking one practical question: can I see enough evidence here to justify shortlisting this person? That is a colder question than candidates expect. Recruiters and hiring managers are not reading supporting statements like personal stories. They are mapping your information against the job description, essential criteria, desirable criteria, and the practical problems the role needs someone to solve.
In many UK application processes, especially public sector and NHS recruitment, the supporting statement carries serious weight because the CV may be limited, standardised, anonymised, or reviewed alongside scoring criteria. If your statement does not clearly show evidence, the panel may not be allowed to infer it.
That is the bit candidates often miss. You may know you can do the job. Your previous manager may know. Your CV may hint at it. But if the supporting statement does not spell it out clearly, the shortlisting panel may have nothing usable to score.
The strongest supporting statements are not the longest. They are the clearest.
A good supporting statement usually does four things well:
It matches the role criteria directly
It gives evidence rather than claims
It explains the value of your experience
It sounds like a real person who understands the job
The mistake I see constantly is candidates trying to sound impressive instead of useful. They write broad phrases like “excellent communication skills,” “strong team player,” “highly motivated,” and “able to work under pressure.” Those phrases are not terrible, but on their own they are empty. They are the recruitment equivalent of beige wallpaper.
A hiring manager does not shortlist you because you say you communicate well. They shortlist you because you show that you have handled difficult stakeholders, explained complex information, managed competing priorities, dealt with sensitive situations, supported service users, improved a process, or delivered something under pressure.
That is the difference between a statement that sounds nice and a statement that gets scored.
Administrative roles often attract many applicants, so vague statements disappear quickly. Hiring managers are usually looking for accuracy, organisation, communication, confidentiality, system use, and the ability to keep things moving without needing constant supervision.
Weak Example
I am applying for this administrative role because I have good organisational skills and enjoy working in an office environment. I am hardworking, reliable, and able to work well as part of a team. I have experience using Microsoft Office and dealing with customers. I believe I would be a good fit for this position.
Why this is weak:
This tells me almost nothing. It makes claims, but gives no evidence. Most applicants could write the same thing. There is no sense of workload, systems, responsibility, accuracy, or judgement.
Good Example
I am applying for this administrative role because my experience matches the need for accurate, organised, and responsive support in a busy office environment. In my current role, I manage shared inboxes, update records, prepare documents, coordinate appointments, and respond to internal and external queries. I am used to handling competing requests while keeping information accurate and confidential.
One example of this was when I supported a team during a period of high absence. I helped prioritise incoming requests, updated tracking spreadsheets, prepared meeting papers, and made sure urgent queries were passed to the right person quickly. This reduced delays for the wider team and helped maintain service standards during a difficult period.
I am confident using Microsoft Office, internal databases, and digital filing systems. I pay close attention to detail because I understand that small administrative errors can create bigger problems later, especially when information is used by managers, colleagues, or service users. I would bring a practical, calm, and organised approach to this role.
Why this works:
This gives the panel evidence. It shows relevant tasks, pressure, responsibility, confidentiality, systems, and impact. It does not just say “organised.” It proves organisation in context.
NHS supporting statements need to be especially precise because shortlisting is often based on the person specification. Candidates often focus too much on wanting to help people, which is understandable, but not enough on evidence.
Compassion matters. But compassion without competence is not enough.
Weak Example
I have always wanted to work for the NHS because I care about helping people. I am friendly, reliable, and work well with patients and colleagues. I believe I would be suitable for this role because I am passionate about healthcare and want to make a difference.
Why this is weak:
The intention is good, but the evidence is missing. NHS panels are not just asking whether you care. They are asking whether you can handle the realities of the role, follow procedures, communicate appropriately, protect confidentiality, and work safely.
Good Example
I am applying for this NHS role because I can bring patient focused communication, strong organisation, and a careful approach to confidential information. In my previous role, I supported service users by answering queries, updating records, booking appointments, and making sure information was passed accurately to the relevant team members.
I understand that in a healthcare setting, administration and communication directly affect patient experience. A missed detail, delayed message, or unclear update can cause frustration for patients and additional pressure for staff. For that reason, I work carefully, ask questions when information is unclear, and keep accurate records.
In one situation, I supported a distressed service user who was confused about an appointment change. I listened calmly, checked the system, explained the next steps clearly, and escalated the issue when it needed further support. The situation was resolved without the person needing to repeat themselves to several different colleagues.
I am comfortable working in busy environments, following procedures, and treating people with dignity and respect. I would bring reliability, discretion, and a practical understanding of how good support contributes to safe and effective patient care.
Why this works:
This statement connects the candidate’s behaviour to NHS priorities: patient experience, accuracy, confidentiality, escalation, dignity, and safe working. It sounds like someone who understands the environment, not just someone who likes the idea of it.
For teaching assistant roles, schools want evidence of patience, safeguarding awareness, behaviour support, communication, adaptability, and the ability to help pupils learn without taking over completely.
A common mistake is writing only about loving children. That may be true, but it is not enough.
Weak Example
I enjoy working with children and think I would be a great teaching assistant. I am kind, patient, and supportive. I would like the opportunity to help pupils learn and be part of a school team.
Why this is weak:
It is warm, but too general. Schools need to know how you support learning, manage behaviour, follow safeguarding procedures, and work with teachers.
Good Example
I am applying for this teaching assistant role because I have experience supporting children’s learning, confidence, and behaviour in a structured and patient way. I understand that the role is not simply about being helpful in the classroom. It is about supporting the teacher, encouraging pupils to become more independent, and responding appropriately to different learning needs.
In my previous experience, I supported pupils with reading activities, classroom tasks, small group work, and emotional regulation. I adapted my communication depending on the child, using clear instructions, encouragement, and calm reminders when needed. I have also supported pupils who needed extra time to understand tasks, making sure they stayed involved without making them feel singled out.
One example was when I worked with a pupil who often became frustrated during written tasks. Instead of giving the answers or allowing the pupil to avoid the work, I broke the task into smaller steps, checked understanding, and praised effort at each stage. Over time, the pupil became more willing to attempt the work independently.
I understand the importance of safeguarding, confidentiality, and following school policies. I would bring patience, consistency, and a practical understanding of how teaching assistants support both learning and classroom routines.
Why this works:
This shows classroom awareness. It explains how the candidate supports learning without overstepping the teacher’s role. That matters because good teaching assistants do not just “help.” They help in a way that supports independence and learning outcomes.
Customer service supporting statements need to show more than friendliness. Employers want evidence that you can manage complaints, communicate clearly, stay calm, use systems, and protect the organisation’s reputation.
Weak Example
I have good customer service skills and enjoy speaking to people. I am polite, friendly, and able to deal with customers in a professional way. I am confident I would be successful in this role.
Why this is weak:
It sounds pleasant, but it gives no proof. Customer service is not tested when everyone is happy. It is tested when someone is frustrated, confused, angry, or has been let down.
Good Example
I am applying for this customer service role because I have experience handling enquiries, resolving issues, and maintaining a professional approach when customers are under pressure. I understand that good customer service is not only about being polite. It is about listening properly, identifying the real issue, giving accurate information, and knowing when to escalate.
In my previous role, I handled customer queries by phone, email, and face to face. I used internal systems to check information, update records, and follow up on outstanding issues. When customers were frustrated, I focused on staying calm, acknowledging the concern, and explaining what I could do next rather than making promises I could not control.
For example, I dealt with a customer who had contacted the team several times about the same issue. I reviewed the previous notes, clarified what had already happened, contacted the relevant department, and gave the customer a clear update. This helped avoid repeated handovers and gave the customer confidence that someone had taken ownership.
I would bring strong communication, patience, and a practical problem solving approach to this role. I understand that every customer interaction shapes how people view the organisation.
Why this works:
This example shows ownership, systems, escalation, emotional control, and realistic service delivery. It avoids the lazy “I like people” approach.
Management supporting statements need to show judgement, prioritisation, leadership, performance management, stakeholder communication, and decision making. Many candidates make the mistake of listing responsibilities without showing leadership impact.
A manager is not shortlisted just because they have managed people. They are shortlisted because the panel can see how they manage.
Weak Example
I have management experience and have led teams in previous roles. I am responsible for performance, training, and making sure work is completed on time. I am a good leader and enjoy motivating people.
Why this is weak:
This tells me the candidate held a management title, but not whether they were effective. It gives no detail about problems solved, decisions made, or team outcomes.
Good Example
I am applying for this manager role because I have experience leading teams through busy operational periods, improving ways of working, and supporting people to perform well. My management style is clear, fair, and practical. I believe teams work best when expectations are understood, problems are dealt with early, and people have enough support to do their jobs properly.
In my current role, I manage day to day workloads, allocate tasks, monitor performance, and support colleagues with training and development. I have also handled difficult conversations when standards were not being met. I do not avoid those conversations, because unclear management usually creates bigger problems for the whole team.
One example was when our team was missing deadlines due to unclear ownership of tasks. I reviewed the workflow, introduced clearer task tracking, agreed priorities with senior stakeholders, and held short regular check ins to identify blockers. This improved visibility, reduced duplicated work, and helped the team meet deadlines more consistently.
I would bring strong organisation, calm decision making, and a realistic understanding of people management to this role. I know that good management is not about looking busy or being the loudest person in the room. It is about creating clarity, removing barriers, and making sure the work gets done to the right standard.
Why this works:
This statement shows management judgement. It gives the hiring manager something useful to assess: leadership style, operational improvement, accountability, and performance handling.
Career change supporting statements are tricky because candidates often apologise for not having the “perfect” background. Do not do that. Your job is to translate your experience into the employer’s language.
The recruiter is asking: does this person understand the role, and can their previous experience transfer well enough to reduce the risk?
Weak Example
Although I do not have direct experience in this field, I am very keen to learn and believe my skills would transfer. I am hardworking, enthusiastic, and ready for a new challenge.
Why this is weak:
This starts from weakness. It tells the employer what is missing before showing what is relevant. Enthusiasm helps, but it does not remove hiring risk.
Good Example
I am applying for this role because my experience in customer facing and administrative work has given me transferable skills that match the requirements of the position. I have developed strong communication, organisation, problem solving, and record keeping skills, all of which are directly relevant to this role.
In my previous role, I handled enquiries, managed competing priorities, updated systems, followed procedures, and worked with colleagues across different teams. This has helped me become confident in learning new processes quickly and staying accurate when handling detailed information.
I understand that moving into a new sector means I will need to build specific knowledge. However, I am not starting from zero. I already have experience dealing with people professionally, managing information carefully, and working in environments where reliability and judgement matter.
I would bring a fresh perspective, strong transferable skills, and a serious commitment to learning the sector properly. I am particularly interested in this role because it would allow me to use my existing strengths while developing deeper specialist knowledge.
Why this works:
This does not beg for a chance. It reduces perceived risk by showing transferable evidence. That is what career changers need to do.
A strong supporting statement does not need to be clever. It needs to be easy to assess.
I usually recommend this structure because it works well for UK application forms and shortlisting panels:
Start with a direct match to the role
Group your evidence around the key criteria
Give specific examples where possible
Explain the result, value, or relevance
End with a confident fit statement
The key is not to write one giant block of text. Long, dense paragraphs make the panel work too hard. And when panels are reviewing a large number of applications, making them work harder is not a strategy I would recommend unless your secret goal is the rejection pile.
A practical structure looks like this:
Opening paragraph:
State the role you are applying for and summarise why your background fits the main requirements.
Evidence paragraphs:
Use each paragraph to cover a major requirement, such as communication, organisation, leadership, customer service, safeguarding, data handling, stakeholder management, or technical knowledge.
Examples:
Where the criteria are important, give a short example that shows the skill in action.
Closing paragraph:
Bring the statement back to the role and the value you would bring.
The strongest applications are easy to score because the evidence is visible. The panel should not have to hunt for it.
Recruiters, hiring managers, and shortlisting panels are usually looking for signs of fit, evidence, judgement, and risk.
That last word matters. Hiring is partly about choosing the right person, but it is also about avoiding avoidable risk. A supporting statement helps employers decide whether you understand the role well enough to do it, and whether your past behaviour suggests you can succeed in their environment.
In practice, they look for:
Clear alignment with the essential criteria
Evidence of relevant tasks and responsibilities
Examples that show judgement, not just activity
Understanding of the organisation’s environment
Professional communication and tone
Signs that you have read the job description properly
Awareness of confidentiality, compliance, safeguarding, or service standards where relevant
Enough detail to justify shortlisting
What they do not want is a beautifully written statement that says very little. I have seen polished applications that were impossible to shortlist because they were full of personality but short on evidence.
The uncomfortable truth is that a less elegant statement with clear evidence often beats a more stylish statement with vague claims. Hiring panels do not score vibes. At least, they are not supposed to.
The biggest supporting statement mistakes are usually not dramatic. They are small, repeated choices that make the application harder to score.
Mistake one: writing about yourself instead of the criteria
A supporting statement should not be a general life story. It should be shaped around what the employer asked for.
Mistake two: using claims without evidence
“I have excellent organisational skills” is a claim. “I coordinated appointments, managed a shared inbox, updated records, and prioritised urgent requests during a high workload period” is evidence.
Mistake three: copying the same statement into every application
Recruiters can spot this quickly. Generic statements feel slightly disconnected from the role. They mention the industry but not the actual requirements.
Mistake four: ignoring the person specification
In many UK public sector applications, this is fatal. If the person specification asks for experience using databases, handling confidential information, or working with vulnerable people, your statement needs to address it clearly.
Mistake five: overusing passion
Passion is not a substitute for competence. I would rather see one strong example of relevant work than five sentences about passion.
Mistake six: writing too much without structure
A long statement can still be weak if it is badly organised. Length does not equal substance. Sometimes candidates write 1,500 words and somehow still avoid giving evidence. Impressive in the worst possible way.
Some phrases feel safe because everyone uses them. The problem is that they are too vague to help you stand out.
Avoid relying on phrases like:
I am hardworking
I am passionate about this role
I have excellent communication skills
I work well under pressure
I am a team player
I am a fast learner
I always go the extra mile
These are not banned. They just need evidence.
Weak Example
I work well under pressure and can manage a busy workload.
Good Example
In my previous role, I regularly managed a busy shared inbox while coordinating appointments and responding to urgent requests. During peak periods, I prioritised tasks by urgency, checked details carefully, and kept colleagues updated so that deadlines were not missed.
Why the good example works:
It shows what pressure looked like, what the candidate did, and why it mattered.
This is the standard you should aim for. Replace personality claims with workplace proof.
The right length depends on the application form, role level, and instructions. As a practical rule, a supporting statement should be long enough to cover the essential criteria properly, but not so long that the evidence becomes buried.
For many UK applications, a strong supporting statement may sit somewhere around 500 to 1,000 words. Senior, specialist, NHS, university, charity, or public sector roles may need more if the person specification is detailed. Entry level roles may need less.
The more important question is not “how long should it be?” but “have I given enough evidence for the panel to shortlist me?”
If the application form gives a word count, respect it. If it asks you to address the person specification, do that directly. If there is no guidance, keep the statement focused, structured, and evidence led.
A short statement that clearly proves fit is better than a long one that wanders around the topic wearing smart shoes.
Use this framework before you submit your application.
Match:
What are the main criteria in the job description and person specification?
Evidence:
What have you done that proves you meet each one?
Context:
Where did you do it, and what kind of environment were you working in?
Action:
What did you personally do?
Value:
What changed, improved, continued, or became easier because of your work?
Relevance:
Why does this example matter for the role you are applying for?
This framework stops you from writing vague statements because it forces you to connect your experience to the employer’s needs.
For example, instead of writing:
Weak Example
I have strong communication skills and can deal with different people.
Write:
Good Example
In my previous role, I communicated with customers, colleagues, and external partners by phone and email. I often had to explain information clearly to people who were frustrated or unsure what to do next. I stayed calm, checked the details carefully, and made sure the person understood the next step before closing the query.
That is a much stronger piece of evidence because it shows communication in a real working situation.
Examples are useful, but copying them word for word is a bad idea. Not because the application police will burst through the door, but because copied statements usually feel slightly wrong. They do not match the candidate’s real experience, the role criteria, or the employer’s language.
Use examples as a structure, not a script.
When adapting a supporting statement example, change:
The role requirements
The type of organisation
The systems, tools, or processes you used
The people you supported
The level of responsibility
The examples and outcomes
The tone based on seniority
A school role should not sound like a corporate operations role. An NHS role should not sound like a retail supervisor application. A university role should not sound like a generic admin statement copied from a template site.
The strongest supporting statements sound specific to both the candidate and the role. That is the sweet spot.
This is the bit many candidates never see.
In structured recruitment, especially across the UK public sector, universities, NHS trusts, councils, and larger organisations, shortlisting is often more systematic than people assume. The panel may review your application against essential and desirable criteria. They may score each area. They may need to justify why you were shortlisted or rejected.
That means your supporting statement needs to make the evidence obvious.
If the criteria say:
Experience managing confidential information
Strong written and verbal communication
Ability to prioritise a varied workload
Experience using Microsoft Office or internal systems
Your statement should visibly address those points. Do not hide them inside a charming paragraph about being motivated. Motivation is nice. Criteria matching gets you shortlisted.
This is why I often tell candidates to write with the shortlisting panel in mind. Make it easy for them to say yes. Not by exaggerating, not by stuffing keywords, and not by sounding like a robot. By giving them relevant, clear, honest evidence.
Before submitting your supporting statement, check it against the role properly. Not in a vague “does this sound good?” way. That question is almost useless because plenty of weak statements sound good.
Ask these questions instead:
Have I addressed the essential criteria?
Have I given evidence rather than just claims?
Have I included examples that match the role level?
Have I shown judgement, not just tasks?
Have I used the employer’s language naturally?
Have I removed generic phrases that add no proof?
Have I made the statement easy to read and score?
Have I explained why my experience matters for this specific role?
A good supporting statement does not need to be perfect. It needs to be clear, relevant, and convincing enough for the panel to move you to the next stage.
That is the real purpose. Not to impress everyone. Not to tell your whole career story. Not to sound like you swallowed a corporate values brochure.
Just prove fit.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin