Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeBehavioural interview questions in Australia are used to test how you have handled real workplace situations, not how well you can describe yourself in theory. Employers ask questions like “Tell me about a time you handled conflict” or “Give me an example of working under pressure” because they want evidence of judgement, communication, ownership, resilience, and cultural fit. The best answers are specific, structured, honest, and relevant to the role. I usually recommend using the STAR method, but not in a robotic way. A strong answer gives context quickly, explains your actions clearly, and shows the result without pretending every workplace story ended in a corporate fairy tale. Australian hiring managers tend to value practical, calm, low ego answers. If your response sounds rehearsed, vague, dramatic, or too perfect, it often creates more doubt than confidence.
Behavioural interview questions are based on a simple hiring belief: past behaviour is one of the best indicators of future behaviour. That sounds neat and scientific, but in real recruitment, it is messier than that.
When an Australian employer asks a behavioural question, they are usually trying to work out three things at once.
Can you do the job in real working conditions?
Do you behave sensibly when things are unclear, pressured, political, or imperfect?
Are you someone the team can trust when no one is standing over your shoulder?
That last point matters more than many candidates realise. A behavioural interview is rarely just about the story you tell. It is about the employer watching how you think, explain, take accountability, and interpret workplace situations.
For example, when a hiring manager asks, “Tell me about a time you dealt with a difficult stakeholder,” they are not simply asking whether you have met an annoying person before. Congratulations, we all have. They are listening for whether you blame others, escalate too quickly, avoid conflict, communicate clearly, adapt your approach, and still protect the outcome.
A weak answer says, “The stakeholder was difficult, but I stayed professional.”
A stronger answer explains what made the situation difficult, what you did to understand their concern, how you adjusted communication, what outcome changed, and what you would do differently next time.
That is the difference between sounding pleasant and sounding hireable.
Australian employers use behavioural interview questions because they reduce some of the guesswork in hiring. Not all of it, obviously. Hiring still contains bias, rushed judgement, awkward panel dynamics, and the occasional interviewer who asks a question they found online five minutes before the meeting. But behavioural questions give employers something more useful than opinions.
They create evidence.
A candidate can say they are “resilient”, “collaborative”, “proactive”, and “a strong communicator”. Those words are everywhere. I see them so often they have almost lost meaning. A behavioural answer forces the candidate to prove the claim through an example.
In Australian interviews, behavioural questions are especially common for:
Government roles
APS and public sector positions
Graduate programs
Banking, insurance, and finance roles
Healthcare and community services roles
Education and university roles
Customer service and contact centre roles
Project management roles
Leadership and management positions
Professional services and corporate roles
They are also common in structured interviews, panel interviews, assessment centres, and interviews where the employer is trying to compare candidates fairly against selection criteria.
What candidates often misunderstand is that behavioural questions are not only for senior roles. Entry level candidates get them too. If you do not have years of work experience, employers may accept examples from study, volunteering, casual work, internships, sport, community responsibilities, or group projects. The standard changes, but the logic stays the same: show me how you behaved when something mattered.
The STAR method stands for Situation, Task, Action, and Result. It is the most common structure used for behavioural interview answers in Australia.
The problem is not the STAR method. The problem is how candidates use it.
Too many people answer like they are filling in a form out loud. The interviewer can almost hear the headings.
“My situation was…”
“My task was…”
“My action was…”
“My result was…”
That is technically structured, but it can sound stiff and unnatural. A good STAR answer should feel like a clear workplace story, not a compliance document wearing a blazer.
Use this structure in your head, but speak like a human.
Situation: Give brief context. What was happening?
Task: Explain your responsibility or goal.
Action: Spend most of your answer here. What did you actually do?
Result: Explain what changed, improved, or was learned.
The action section matters most. This is where hiring managers assess your judgement. Many candidates over explain the situation and rush through their actual contribution. That is a mistake. Employers are not hiring the situation. They are hiring the person who took action in it.
A practical answer shape looks like this:
One or two sentences for context
One sentence explaining your responsibility
Three to five sentences explaining your actions
One or two sentences explaining the result
One final sentence showing reflection, if useful
Reflection is underrated. A candidate who can say, “What I learnt from that was…” or “If I handled it again, I would involve the stakeholder earlier” often sounds more mature than someone pretending everything was flawless.
Most behavioural interview questions in Australia are built around workplace competencies. The wording changes, but the underlying themes are predictable.
These questions test collaboration, self awareness, communication, and whether you can work with people who do not think exactly like you.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you worked successfully in a team.
Give me an example of when you supported a colleague.
Tell me about a time your team disagreed on how to approach a task.
Describe a time you had to collaborate with people from different backgrounds or functions.
What employers are really checking is whether you understand team contribution beyond “I am friendly”. They want to know if you share information, manage tension, respect different roles, and contribute without needing applause every three minutes.
Weak Example: “I worked in a team project and we all communicated well, so we got a good result.”
Good Example: “In my previous role, our team had to prepare a client reporting pack with a tight deadline because data came through later than expected. My role was to manage the client commentary section, but I noticed the analyst was getting stuck waiting on figures from another team. I checked which parts were already confirmed, drafted the narrative around those sections first, and set up a quick call so we could agree what still needed validation. That helped the team avoid duplicating work and meant we delivered the report on time. It reminded me that teamwork is not just doing your own section. It is noticing where the handover points can break.”
Why this works: it shows practical collaboration, awareness of workflow, and ownership beyond the candidate’s narrow task.
Conflict questions test emotional control, communication, judgement, and whether you can handle disagreement without turning it into a workplace soap opera.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you had a conflict at work.
Describe a time you disagreed with a colleague.
Give me an example of dealing with a difficult stakeholder.
Tell me about a time you had to manage tension in a team.
The biggest mistake is choosing an example where you sound like the hero and everyone else sounds incompetent. I know it is tempting. But if your answer makes everyone else look terrible, the interviewer may start wondering what you are like to work with.
A strong conflict answer should show:
You understood the other person’s perspective
You did not avoid the issue
You communicated clearly
You focused on the work outcome
You remained professional
You learnt something useful
Weak Example: “My colleague was not doing their work properly, so I told my manager and then it was fixed.”
Good Example: “In one role, I worked with a colleague who had a different view on how urgent a client request was. I thought it needed same day action, while they saw it as something we could include in the next scheduled update. Rather than going back and forth over email, I suggested a short call. I asked what they were concerned about, and they explained they did not want to send incomplete information. I agreed that accuracy mattered, so I proposed we send a brief holding update to the client with a clear timeframe for the full response. That kept the client informed without rushing the details. The issue was resolved, and we used the same approach for similar requests later.”
Why this works: it shows maturity. The candidate did not need to win the argument. They solved the communication problem.
Pressure questions test prioritisation, resilience, planning, and whether you become chaotic when the workload gets real.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you worked under pressure.
Give me an example of managing competing deadlines.
Describe a time you had to deliver something quickly.
Tell me about a time priorities changed unexpectedly.
Australian hiring managers usually do not expect candidates to pretend they love pressure. Be careful with the “I thrive under pressure” line. Sometimes it sounds confident. Sometimes it sounds like you have not yet met a truly broken workload.
A better approach is to explain how you create order.
Strong answers show that you can:
Separate urgent from important
Communicate early
Reset expectations when needed
Focus on the highest value work
Stay calm enough to make decisions
Ask for support when appropriate
Good Example: “In my last role, I had two client deliverables due on the same day and one internal request that was marked urgent. I reviewed the deadlines and impact first instead of trying to do everything at once. One client deliverable had a hard external deadline, while the internal request could be completed the next morning without affecting the outcome. I spoke with my manager, confirmed the priority order, and updated the internal stakeholder with a realistic timeframe. I completed the client work on time and avoided creating a false promise. What worked was not working faster for the sake of it. It was clarifying what actually mattered first.”
That final sentence is useful because it reveals judgement. Employers like candidates who can distinguish urgency from noise.
Adaptability questions test how you respond when plans change, systems fail, expectations shift, or someone senior suddenly decides the strategy is now “different”. Very common. Very human. Very workplace.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you adapted to change.
Describe a time your priorities changed suddenly.
Give me an example of learning a new system or process.
Tell me about a time you had to change your approach.
A generic answer says, “I am flexible and open to change.”
A better answer proves it through behaviour.
Strong adaptability examples usually include:
A change in process, team, technology, workload, client need, or business direction
Initial uncertainty or disruption
A practical action you took to adjust
Evidence that you kept performance steady
A lesson about how you manage change
The mistake candidates make is acting as though change never bothered them. That is not always believable. You can acknowledge uncertainty without sounding negative.
For example: “At first, the change created some confusion because the reporting lines were not clear. I focused on confirming decision ownership first, then adjusted my weekly updates so the right people had visibility.”
That is more credible than “I adapted quickly and everything was fine.”
Leadership behavioural questions are not only for managers. Employers ask them when they want evidence of initiative, influence, accountability, and decision making.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you led a team or project.
Give me an example of influencing others.
Describe a time you took initiative.
Tell me about a time you had to make a difficult decision.
Leadership does not always mean having the title. In Australian hiring, especially for professional roles, employers often value quiet leadership: the ability to step forward, organise work, support others, and move things along without being dramatic about it.
Strong leadership answers show:
Clear ownership
Sensible decision making
Communication with the right people
Awareness of risk
Ability to bring others with you
Outcome focus
Avoid turning leadership answers into humble bragging. The best leadership stories often include complexity. Maybe the team was unclear. Maybe stakeholders disagreed. Maybe you had limited authority. That is useful. It shows how you lead when things are not perfectly arranged for you.
These questions are common in customer facing, government, healthcare, education, administration, sales, account management, and operations roles.
Common examples include:
Tell me about a time you handled a difficult customer.
Describe a time you managed stakeholder expectations.
Give me an example of resolving a complaint.
Tell me about a time you had to explain complex information clearly.
Employers are listening for emotional control and practical communication. They want to know if you can stay calm without becoming passive, helpful without overpromising, and professional without sounding cold.
The strongest answers usually include:
What the customer or stakeholder needed
What made the situation difficult
How you listened or clarified the issue
What action you took
How you managed expectations
What the final outcome was
The hidden test here is boundaries. A lot of candidates think good service means saying yes to everything. It does not. In many Australian workplaces, especially regulated environments, good service means being clear, fair, accurate, and calm.
Choosing the right example is half the work. A beautifully structured answer will still fail if the example is weak, irrelevant, or too minor for the role.
When preparing for behavioural interview questions, I would build a small bank of strong examples before the interview. You do not need a different story for every possible question. You need flexible examples that can be adapted.
Choose examples that show:
A real challenge or decision point
Your direct involvement
Actions that match the role requirements
A clear outcome or learning
Enough detail to be credible
Professional judgement, not just effort
The best examples often come from moments where something was not straightforward. A delayed project. A difficult customer. A stakeholder disagreement. A system issue. A sudden deadline. A colleague needing support. A mistake that had to be fixed.
Do not only choose perfect success stories. Employers know work is messy. Sometimes a story where you recovered well, communicated early, or learnt from a mistake is more persuasive than a polished story where everything magically went according to plan.
An example is usually too weak if:
You were only watching, not doing
The stakes were very low
The result is unclear
The story could apply to anyone
You cannot explain your specific actions
You spend most of the answer describing other people
The example does not connect to the role
For senior roles, avoid examples that sound too junior unless they show something strategically relevant. For entry level roles, smaller examples are acceptable, but they still need to show maturity and self awareness.
Not every interviewer uses a formal scoring sheet, but many do, especially in government, APS, large corporate, university, healthcare, and structured recruitment processes.
Even when there is no visible scorecard, the interviewer is still mentally assessing your answer against the role.
They are usually listening for:
Relevance to the question
Specificity of the example
Complexity appropriate to the role
Your personal contribution
Quality of your decision making
Communication clarity
Evidence of the required competency
Outcome or impact
Self awareness
A common hiring reality is that candidates often answer the question they wish they had been asked, not the one actually asked. If the question is about conflict and you give a general teamwork answer, it may sound pleasant but miss the competency.
Listen carefully to the wording. “Tell me about a time you influenced someone” is not the same as “Tell me about a time you worked in a team.” Influence requires persuasion, resistance, communication, and outcome. Teamwork can be broader.
A strong behavioural answer makes the interviewer’s job easy. They should not have to dig through your story to find the competency. You are not writing a mystery novel. Give them the evidence clearly.
The STAR method is useful, but I prefer candidates to think in a slightly more practical way before they speak.
Ask yourself:
What is the competency being tested?
What example proves I have used that competency?
What did I personally do?
What changed because of my actions?
What does this story prove about how I work?
This prevents one of the biggest behavioural interview problems: storytelling without strategy.
A candidate may tell a long, detailed story that is technically true but strategically weak. The interviewer leaves thinking, “Interesting, but I am not sure what that proves.”
Before the interview, prepare examples across these categories:
Working under pressure
Managing conflict or disagreement
Solving a problem
Handling change
Supporting a team
Taking initiative
Managing a mistake
Dealing with a difficult customer or stakeholder
Influencing without authority
Delivering a result
For each example, prepare the short version first. This matters. Many candidates prepare too much and then ramble. Your answer should be clear enough to deliver in roughly one to two minutes, with room for follow up questions.
A good interviewer may ask you to expand. That is fine. But do not make them rescue the answer from a six minute monologue.
Below are practical examples of how behavioural interview answers can be shaped for Australian interviews. These are not scripts to memorise. Use them to understand the level of detail and judgement expected.
Weak Example: “I once made a mistake in a report, but I fixed it quickly and learnt to check my work.”
This is too vague. Everyone claims they learnt to check their work. It does not show the scale of the mistake, your response, or your judgement.
Good Example: “In a previous administration role, I sent a client update with an outdated attachment because I had saved two versions of the same document with similar names. I noticed the mistake shortly after sending it, so I immediately told my manager, contacted the client with the correct version, and clearly explained which document should be used. I then changed my file naming process and started using a final review folder for documents ready to send. The issue did not escalate, but it taught me that accuracy is not just about checking content. It is also about having a process that reduces avoidable errors.”
This works because it shows accountability without panic. The candidate does not hide the mistake or over dramatise it.
Good Example: “In a customer service role, I supported a customer who was frustrated because their request had been transferred between departments without a clear answer. They were upset before I even had the full details, so I focused first on letting them explain the issue without interrupting. I then summarised what I understood, confirmed what I could check, and gave them a realistic timeframe instead of promising an instant fix. I contacted the internal team, found the missing information, and called the customer back within the timeframe I had given. The customer was still not thrilled with the original delay, but they appreciated having one person take ownership. That experience taught me that customers often calm down when they feel someone is finally accountable.”
This works because it shows emotional control, ownership, and expectation management.
Good Example: “In my previous role, our team had to prepare a board pack earlier than expected because the meeting date moved forward. Several inputs were still missing, so I created a quick priority list showing what was complete, what was outstanding, and who owned each section. I checked with my manager which parts were essential for the first version and which could be updated later. I then followed up with contributors using specific deadlines rather than general reminders. We submitted the pack on time, and the later updates were handled cleanly because everyone knew what was still pending. The key was making the work visible instead of just working faster in the background.”
This works because it shows structure under pressure. Employers like calm operators.
Good Example: “In a project support role, I noticed that stakeholders were not using the new request form because it felt too long and unclear. The team initially thought people were just resisting change, but I thought the process itself was creating friction. I gathered a few examples of incomplete requests, identified which fields were causing confusion, and suggested we simplify the form while keeping the mandatory information needed for reporting. I explained that the goal was not to lower standards, but to make the correct process easier to follow. After the changes, the quality of requests improved and there were fewer follow up emails. It showed me that influence often works better when you remove friction rather than just remind people to comply.”
This works because it demonstrates problem solving, persuasion, and practical thinking.
Some candidates lose marks not because they lack experience, but because they present it poorly.
Vague answers are the biggest problem. “I communicated effectively” is not evidence. “I scheduled a call, clarified the concern, confirmed the deadline, and sent a summary afterwards” is evidence.
Recruiters and hiring managers trust specific actions more than personality claims.
Old examples are not always wrong, but they can create doubt if they no longer reflect your current level. If you are applying for a leadership role and your best example is from a university group assignment ten years ago, the interviewer will quietly have questions.
Use recent examples where possible. If an older example is genuinely strong, explain why it is still relevant.
You can describe difficult behaviour without sounding bitter. There is a difference between “The stakeholder kept changing requirements” and “The stakeholder was impossible and had no idea what they wanted.”
The first is a workplace problem. The second makes the interviewer wonder how you speak about people when they are not in the room.
Some candidates make every answer sound too perfect. No tension, no uncertainty, no trade offs, no mistake, no learning. That can feel fake.
Real work has constraints. A credible answer often includes what was difficult and how you handled it.
The result does not always need to be a dramatic business outcome. It can be:
A deadline met
A complaint resolved
A process improved
A stakeholder aligned
A risk reduced
A team supported
A lesson applied later
But there needs to be some kind of outcome. Without a result, the answer feels unfinished.
A long answer is not automatically a strong answer. In fact, long answers often hide weak structure. If you cannot explain the example clearly, the interviewer may assume the thinking was unclear too.
Aim for enough detail to prove the competency without making the interviewer age visibly on camera.
Behavioural interview questions are especially common in Australian Public Service and government recruitment. APS interviews often assess candidates against work level standards, capabilities, selection criteria, and role requirements.
The language may sound formal, but the goal is still practical. They want evidence that you can operate at the required level.
For APS and government roles, behavioural answers often need to show:
Sound judgement
Accountability
Written and verbal communication
Stakeholder management
Integrity and discretion
Policy or process awareness
Ability to work within guidelines
Service orientation
Risk awareness
Collaboration across teams
A common APS mistake is giving an answer that is too task based and not enough judgement based. For example, “I completed the report by the deadline” may not be enough if the question is testing stakeholder engagement, risk, or strategic thinking.
For government interviews, make sure your answer explains why you took certain actions, not just what you did. Decision logic matters.
If you are applying for an APS role, read the job advertisement carefully and match your examples to the capability language. If the role mentions “build productive relationships”, prepare examples involving stakeholders, communication, negotiation, and trust. If it mentions “achieve results”, prepare examples involving delivery, prioritisation, obstacles, and measurable outcomes.
Preparation does not mean memorising scripts. It means knowing your best examples well enough that you can adapt them naturally.
Before the interview, review the job ad and identify the likely competencies. Look for repeated clues such as:
Stakeholder engagement
Customer service
Problem solving
Working under pressure
Managing competing priorities
Collaboration
Leadership
Initiative
Communication
Change management
Attention to detail
Then prepare examples that prove those capabilities.
For each example, write a short note covering:
The situation
Your responsibility
The actions you took
The result
What the example proves
What you learnt
Practise out loud. Reading silently is not enough. Many candidates think they are prepared because the answer makes sense in their head. Then they say it out loud and realise it has the structure of a dropped suitcase.
Practising helps you find the clean version.
Also prepare for follow up questions. Good interviewers may ask:
What would you do differently now?
How did you measure success?
What was your specific role?
How did the other person respond?
What did you learn from that situation?
How did you manage competing expectations?
These questions are not necessarily traps. They are often used to test depth. If your original answer was real and well understood, follow ups should be manageable.
This happens more often than candidates admit. You get a question, your mind goes blank, and suddenly every workplace memory you have ever had packs its bags and leaves.
Do not panic.
You can pause briefly and say, “I will take a moment to think of the most relevant example.” That is much better than launching into a weak answer immediately.
If you genuinely cannot find the perfect example, choose the closest relevant one and be transparent in how you frame it.
For example: “I have not had that exact situation with an external client, but I had a similar situation with an internal stakeholder where the same skill was required.”
That is acceptable if the competency matches.
Do not say, “I have never had conflict.” Nobody believes that. It may sound like you lack experience, self awareness, or honesty. Conflict does not have to mean shouting. It can mean disagreement, competing priorities, unclear expectations, or different views on a decision.
If you are early career, use examples from casual work, study, volunteering, internships, placements, community roles, or team activities. The example does not need to be corporate. It needs to show the behaviour.
Australian interview culture usually rewards confidence, but not arrogance. There is a quiet preference for candidates who are capable, clear, and grounded. Overselling can backfire.
To sound confident:
Use specific examples
Speak clearly and directly
Avoid unnecessary disclaimers
Own your contribution
Explain your decisions
Be honest about challenges
Keep the answer relevant to the role
Avoid starting every answer with “I guess”, “probably”, “just”, or “maybe”. These words can make strong experience sound uncertain.
At the same time, avoid inflated language like “I single handedly transformed the entire process” unless you actually did. Most workplace outcomes are shared. You can own your contribution without pretending the rest of the team was decorative furniture.
A good line is: “My role in that was…” It clearly separates your contribution from the broader team outcome. Interviewers appreciate that because it helps them assess you fairly.
The strongest behavioural interview answers are not the most dramatic. They are the clearest, most relevant, and most believable.
Australian employers are usually not looking for a perfect hero story. They are looking for evidence that you can handle real work: unclear expectations, difficult conversations, pressure, mistakes, changing priorities, and people with different views.
If you prepare properly, behavioural interview questions become much less intimidating. You are not trying to invent impressive stories on the spot. You are showing the interviewer how you already operate.
My honest advice is this: do not memorise polished scripts. Prepare real examples, understand what each one proves, and practise explaining them clearly. The goal is not to sound like you attended an interview coaching seminar. The goal is to sound like someone who has done the work, learnt from it, and can be trusted to do it again.
Written by Simar Malhi, a recruiter and headhunter with international recruitment experience. I write about CVs, job applications, hiring decisions, and the reality behind recruitment processes. My goal is to help candidates understand more honestly how employers, recruiters, and hiring managers actually select candidates.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin