Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeA TypeScript AI developer builds production-ready applications powered by large language models, retrieval systems, and AI workflows using technologies like TypeScript, React, Next.js, Node.js, OpenAI APIs, vector databases, and orchestration frameworks such as LangChain.js or the Vercel AI SDK.
In today’s hiring market, companies are not looking for developers who simply “used ChatGPT APIs.” They want engineers who can build reliable AI product experiences with real-world considerations like streaming UX, prompt safety, cost controls, authentication, rate limiting, retrieval pipelines, and monitoring.
That distinction matters.
A developer who can connect an OpenAI endpoint is junior-level. A developer who can design scalable AI interfaces, optimize token usage, handle hallucination risks, and build production-grade RAG workflows is highly employable.
Most AI startups hiring TypeScript developers are evaluating candidates on four things:
Can you ship usable AI products fast?
Can you build modern frontend AI experiences?
Can you control AI infrastructure cost and reliability?
Can you think like a product engineer, not just a coder?
That is the real hiring standard for TypeScript AI application roles today.
TypeScript has become the default language for AI product engineering because modern AI applications are increasingly frontend-heavy and interaction-driven.
Most companies building AI products today use:
React
Next.js
Node.js
Vercel
Serverless infrastructure
Edge functions
Real-time streaming interfaces
TypeScript fits naturally into this ecosystem.
It also reduces one of the biggest operational risks in AI products: unpredictable data structures.
When working with LLMs, structured typing becomes extremely valuable for:
Function calling
Tool invocation
JSON schema validation
Prompt pipeline outputs
API orchestration
Vector search responses
Agent workflows
Multi-step AI interactions
Hiring managers increasingly favor TypeScript developers because they can contribute across frontend, backend, and AI integration layers without context switching between ecosystems.
This is the baseline requirement.
Most companies expect developers to integrate:
OpenAI API
Anthropic API
Google Gemini APIs
Azure OpenAI
Groq
Together AI
Mistral APIs
But integration alone is not enough.
Strong candidates understand:
Token management
Context window optimization
Retry strategies
Timeout handling
Rate limiting
Streaming architectures
Structured outputs
Function calling reliability
Prompt injection prevention
Recruiters can immediately tell the difference between tutorial-level projects and production-aware implementations.
Modern AI products are heavily UX-dependent.
The strongest candidates know how to build:
Streaming chat interfaces
Multi-message conversation state
AI response rendering
Markdown rendering
Code block rendering
Citation systems
Prompt history
Conversation memory
Interruptible responses
AI loading states
Retry flows
Feedback systems
Most weak AI portfolios fail here.
They look technically functional but feel unusable.
Hiring managers often reject AI projects because the UX demonstrates shallow product thinking.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation is now one of the most valuable AI engineering skills.
Companies want developers who can build AI systems grounded in proprietary data.
That usually means integrating:
Pinecone
Weaviate
Chroma
PostgreSQL pgvector
Supabase Vector
Redis Vector Search
But recruiters are evaluating more than database usage.
They want evidence you understand:
Chunking strategies
Embedding pipelines
Retrieval quality
Semantic search
Metadata filtering
Citation generation
Hybrid search
Context compression
Hallucination reduction
A simple “chat with PDF” clone is no longer impressive unless execution quality is exceptional.
This is one of the clearest differentiators between junior and advanced AI developers.
Weak implementations wait for full responses before rendering.
Strong implementations use token streaming.
That matters because streaming dramatically improves perceived performance and user engagement.
Advanced AI frontend developers know how to implement:
Server-sent events
Streaming APIs
Incremental rendering
Optimistic UI updates
Cancellation handling
Partial response rendering
Real-time markdown updates
Recruiters frequently associate polished streaming experiences with production readiness.
As AI applications mature, orchestration skills matter more.
This includes:
Multi-step prompt pipelines
Tool calling systems
Function execution chains
Agent workflows
AI automation systems
Memory management
Structured response pipelines
Frameworks commonly used include:
LangChain.js
Vercel AI SDK
LlamaIndex
OpenAI Assistants API
Temporal
Trigger.dev
Companies increasingly value developers who can orchestrate workflows instead of just generating text.
Portfolio quality matters more than certifications in AI hiring.
Most recruiters care far more about what you built than what course you completed.
This is one of the strongest portfolio projects because it demonstrates:
LLM integration
Resume parsing
Prompt engineering
Structured outputs
UX design
AI evaluation workflows
Strong versions include:
ATS scoring
Resume-job matching
Resume rewriting
Keyword optimization
Recruiter-style feedback
Semantic comparison
Weak versions simply rewrite resumes generically.
This remains one of the best signals of practical AI engineering capability.
A strong implementation includes:
File ingestion pipelines
Embedding generation
Vector search
Citations
Multi-document retrieval
Streaming responses
Authentication
Usage limits
Error handling
The difference between average and impressive is usually reliability and UX.
This is highly valuable because it mirrors real startup use cases.
Strong implementations demonstrate:
Context-aware retrieval
Conversation memory
Escalation logic
Human handoff flows
Analytics dashboards
Tool calling
CRM integrations
Rate limiting
Monitoring systems
Hiring managers love projects tied to obvious business outcomes.
This project category demonstrates advanced frontend AI engineering.
Strong versions include:
Code rendering
Syntax highlighting
Streaming completions
File-aware context
Diff generation
AI autocomplete
Multi-step reasoning flows
This type of project strongly signals engineering maturity.
Most developers misunderstand portfolio evaluation.
Recruiters are not reviewing your code architecture deeply during initial screening.
They evaluate:
Product quality
Business relevance
Technical credibility
Real-world thinking
User experience
Engineering judgment
Here is what instantly improves portfolio credibility:
Weak portfolios say:
Weak Example:
“Built an AI chatbot using OpenAI API.”
Strong portfolios say:
Good Example:
“Built a streaming AI customer support platform handling 15,000+ monthly conversations with RAG retrieval across 50,000 support documents.”
Metrics create credibility.
Recruiters are highly impressed by projects that include:
Authentication
Billing systems
Usage tracking
Cost controls
Error monitoring
AI moderation
Prompt safety
Admin dashboards
Logging systems
These are signals of real engineering capability.
The best AI projects solve practical business problems.
Weak projects:
Generic chatbots
AI quote generators
Simple wrappers around ChatGPT
Strong projects:
Workflow automation
Knowledge retrieval systems
Operational efficiency tools
AI copilots
Decision support systems
Business relevance matters enormously.
This is the most common issue.
Hiring managers have seen thousands of identical:
ChatGPT clones
PDF chat apps
AI writing assistants
Without differentiation, these projects add little value.
You need either:
Exceptional execution
Real users
Business relevance
Unique architecture
Advanced workflows
Otherwise the project feels disposable.
Strong AI engineers think about economics.
Weak candidates generate massive token usage with no controls.
Good AI applications include:
Request throttling
Token budgeting
Caching strategies
Context compression
Response truncation
Usage analytics
This matters especially for startups operating under tight margins.
Many AI apps technically work but feel slow and broken.
Bad UX signals weak engineering judgment.
Common failures include:
Frozen interfaces
Delayed rendering
No loading indicators
Broken markdown rendering
Lost conversation state
Failed retries
Hiring managers strongly associate polished UX with seniority.
This is becoming a major hiring concern.
Companies increasingly care about:
Prompt injection risks
Unsafe outputs
PII exposure
Jailbreak attempts
Sensitive data handling
Even small projects should demonstrate awareness of AI safety basics.
A modern high-value AI TypeScript stack often includes:
React
Next.js
Tailwind CSS
Vercel AI SDK
Node.js
TypeScript
tRPC
Prisma
OpenAI API
Anthropic API
LangChain.js
LlamaIndex
Pinecone
Weaviate
pgvector
Supabase Vector
Clerk
Auth.js
Stripe
Vercel
Railway
Sentry
PostHog
The strongest candidates understand how these systems work together operationally.
AI hiring is extremely noisy right now.
Many resumes claim AI experience without real depth.
Recruiters are filtering aggressively.
Weak bullet point:
Weak Example:
“Integrated OpenAI API into React application.”
Strong bullet point:
Good Example:
“Built AI-powered document search platform using Next.js, LangChain.js, and pgvector, reducing customer support lookup time by 62%.”
Outcomes matter more than integrations.
Strong AI resumes include terminology like:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Vector search
Function calling
Prompt orchestration
Streaming responses
Semantic search
Context management
Tool invocation
AI workflow automation
But keyword stuffing is obvious.
The language must align with real implementation experience.
This is one of the biggest differentiators.
Recruiters increasingly favor developers who think about:
User retention
AI reliability
UX flow
Monetization
Cost control
Error recovery
Purely technical resumes often lose to product-aware candidates.
The market is competitive but unusually opportunity-rich.
Startups are aggressively hiring developers who can ship AI features quickly.
The strongest opportunities currently exist in:
AI SaaS startups
Productivity tools
Developer tooling
AI workflow platforms
Customer support AI
Knowledge management systems
AI search products
Internal enterprise copilots
Companies are especially interested in engineers who can operate across:
Frontend engineering
AI integration
Product development
Full stack workflows
This hybrid capability is highly valuable.
Senior AI developers think beyond implementation.
They consider:
Reliability
Cost
Monitoring
Evaluation quality
User trust
System scalability
Business impact
Junior developers focus mainly on generating outputs.
Senior developers focus on building dependable AI systems.
That distinction matters heavily during interviews.
Most interviews focus less on algorithms and more on practical product engineering.
Common interview topics include:
LLM integration design
Streaming architecture
RAG implementation
Vector database choices
Prompt reliability
AI hallucination mitigation
API cost optimization
Conversation memory handling
AI UX decisions
Authentication flows
Strong candidates explain tradeoffs clearly.
Interviewers care deeply about engineering judgment.
The fastest path is not collecting certifications.
It is building 2–3 polished, production-quality AI applications.
Your projects should demonstrate:
Real-world usefulness
Strong UX
AI infrastructure understanding
Modern TypeScript architecture
Product thinking
Operational awareness
One excellent AI product portfolio project is often more valuable than ten mediocre clones.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin
