Choose from a wide range of NEWCV resume templates and customize your NEWCV design with a single click.
Use ATS-optimised Resume and resume templates that pass applicant tracking systems. Our Resume builder helps recruiters read, scan, and shortlist your Resume faster.
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create Resume
Use professional field-tested resume templates that follow the exact Resume rules employers look for.
Create ResumeAPS pitch examples are only useful if they reflect how Australian Public Service hiring panels actually assess candidates. Most applicants fail because they write generic summaries, repeat their resume, or misunderstand what the pitch is designed to evaluate.
An APS pitch is not a cover letter. It is a targeted assessment document used to evaluate whether you can demonstrate the required capabilities, behaviours, and outcomes outlined in the role description. Hiring panels use it to shortlist candidates before interviews, often very quickly.
Strong APS pitches:
Directly align with the job requirements
Use evidence-based examples
Demonstrate outcomes and impact
Match APS capability expectations
Show judgement, communication, and stakeholder management
Stay concise while still being specific
Weak APS pitches are usually vague, overly corporate, or filled with unsupported claims like “excellent communicator” or “highly motivated professional” without evidence.
An APS pitch is a short written statement submitted as part of an Australian Public Service job application. It is commonly requested for APS3 to EL2 roles and is usually between 500 and 1000 words, although some agencies request one-page pitches or statements addressing selection criteria.
The pitch is used to assess:
Suitability for the role
Alignment with APS capabilities
Communication skills
Ability to provide evidence-based examples
Understanding of the role requirements
Judgement and professional maturity
In practical terms, the APS pitch helps recruiters and panel members answer one question:
“Can this person perform effectively in this role based on demonstrated evidence?”
That is why generic writing fails.
This guide explains exactly how strong APS pitches are assessed, what hiring managers actually look for, and includes high-quality APS pitch examples that reflect modern Australian government recruitment standards.
APS recruitment is heavily evidence-based and merit-driven. Panels are trained to evaluate demonstrated behaviours and outcomes, not personality-driven claims or inflated self-promotion.
Most online advice oversimplifies APS pitches into “match keywords from the job ad”. That is only part of the process.
Experienced APS hiring panels assess several things simultaneously.
The strongest pitches align naturally with APS capability frameworks such as:
Communicates with influence
Supports productive working relationships
Delivers results
Displays personal drive and integrity
Thinks strategically
Achieves outcomes through collaboration
Good applicants show these capabilities through examples rather than simply naming them.
Panels want proof that your work created measurable outcomes.
Weak statements:
Strong statements:
The second version demonstrates:
Action
Scope
Outcome
Professional relevance
APS recruitment strongly values transferable public sector behaviours such as:
Governance awareness
Accountability
Policy understanding
Risk management
Procedural accuracy
Stakeholder management
Communication clarity
Private sector candidates often fail because they focus too heavily on commercial achievements without translating them into APS-relevant capability language.
Poorly structured pitches are heavily penalised.
Hiring managers notice immediately when applicants:
Ramble
Overwrite
Use buzzwords excessively
Avoid specifics
Fail to answer the actual role requirements
Strong APS pitches are:
Structured
Clear
Outcome-focused
Evidence-driven
Easy to scan quickly
One of the biggest mistakes applicants make is treating the APS pitch like a traditional cover letter.
That usually leads to generic introductions and unnecessary career summaries.
A much stronger APS pitch structure is:
Briefly establish:
Current role or background
Years of experience
Relevant domain expertise
Alignment with the role
Keep this concise.
Use 2 to 4 strong examples demonstrating:
Relevant capability
Complexity
Stakeholder interaction
Decision-making
Outcomes achieved
This is where most of the pitch value sits.
Finish by reinforcing:
Suitability for the role
Alignment with APS values
Motivation for contributing
Relevant strengths
Avoid dramatic or emotional conclusions.
Example
“I am an experienced administrative and stakeholder engagement professional with over five years’ experience supporting compliance, reporting, and operational delivery within fast-paced environments. My background includes coordinating cross-functional activities, managing competing priorities, and delivering accurate outcomes within strict procedural frameworks.
In my current role, I manage complex client enquiries and coordinate documentation workflows across multiple internal teams. I identified recurring delays caused by inconsistent record handling and introduced a revised tracking process that improved response times by 32% within three months. This required close collaboration with operational staff, strong attention to detail, and the ability to communicate procedural changes clearly to stakeholders with varying levels of technical understanding.
I have also demonstrated strong communication and relationship management skills through supporting stakeholder engagement activities involving external providers, internal business units, and senior managers. During a major reporting project, I coordinated information gathering across six departments under tight deadlines, ensuring reporting obligations were met accurately and on time. My ability to remain organised, prioritise effectively, and maintain positive working relationships contributed to successful project delivery.
I am highly motivated to contribute to the APS and believe my experience managing operational processes, supporting stakeholder outcomes, and delivering accurate administrative services aligns strongly with the requirements of this role.”
This example succeeds because it:
Uses evidence instead of claims
Demonstrates measurable outcomes
Reflects APS-style language naturally
Shows communication and stakeholder capability
Maintains strong relevance to APS5 expectations
Avoids unnecessary fluff
APS6 roles typically assess:
Greater autonomy
Decision-making capability
Leadership influence
Stakeholder management complexity
Strategic thinking
Example
“I am an experienced policy and program professional with extensive experience delivering complex projects, managing stakeholder relationships, and supporting strategic outcomes within regulated environments. My background includes leading process improvement initiatives, preparing high-level briefing materials, and coordinating cross-functional collaboration to achieve operational and policy objectives.
In my current position, I led a review of internal reporting processes after identifying inconsistencies affecting executive decision-making. I consulted with operational teams, analysed reporting gaps, and implemented revised governance procedures that improved data accuracy and reduced reporting turnaround times by 40%. This initiative required strong analytical capability, stakeholder engagement, and the ability to influence process changes across multiple business areas.
I have also managed sensitive stakeholder relationships involving external agencies, senior executives, and operational teams during high-pressure project delivery periods. During a national implementation project, I coordinated competing priorities across multiple jurisdictions while ensuring compliance obligations and project deadlines were maintained. My ability to communicate clearly, manage risk, and provide practical solutions contributed to successful project delivery within tight timeframes.
I am motivated by opportunities to contribute to evidence-based decision-making and public sector outcomes. I believe my experience delivering strategic improvements, supporting collaborative stakeholder relationships, and achieving operational results aligns strongly with the requirements of this APS6 role.”
APS6 recruitment panels assess beyond operational delivery.
They expect evidence of:
Initiative
Leadership influence
Judgement
Governance awareness
Strategic contribution
That means purely task-based examples often fail at APS6 level.
Executive Level roles require significantly more sophistication.
EL1 pitches are assessed for:
Leadership capability
Strategic oversight
Decision-making maturity
Risk management
Influence across business areas
Organisational impact
Example
“I am a senior program and operational leader with extensive experience driving strategic initiatives, leading multidisciplinary teams, and delivering complex organisational outcomes within government and regulated environments. My background includes leading operational transformation projects, managing high-level stakeholder engagement, and supporting executive decision-making through evidence-based analysis and governance oversight.
In a recent leadership role, I directed a large-scale operational improvement initiative designed to address escalating service delivery delays affecting multiple business units. I led cross-functional consultation activities, established revised governance frameworks, and implemented performance monitoring measures that reduced processing backlogs by 45% over six months while improving compliance consistency. This work required strategic planning, stakeholder negotiation, and the ability to manage competing organisational priorities in a politically sensitive environment.
I have also demonstrated strong leadership capability through mentoring staff, supporting capability development, and fostering collaborative working relationships across operational and executive teams. During a significant organisational change process, I provided strategic advice to senior executives regarding implementation risks, workforce impacts, and stakeholder communication strategies. My ability to balance operational delivery with broader strategic objectives contributed to successful organisational outcomes.
I am committed to delivering high-quality public sector outcomes through collaborative leadership, strategic thinking, and continuous improvement. I believe my experience leading complex initiatives, managing stakeholder relationships, and driving organisational performance aligns strongly with the requirements of this Executive Level role.”
APS pitches are not traditional corporate cover letters.
Recruiters immediately notice when candidates:
Use overly generic introductions
Focus on personality instead of evidence
Repeat their resume summary
Avoid concrete examples
Many applicants describe duties instead of achievements.
Weak:
Strong:
APS panels assess demonstrated impact.
APS hiring managers regularly see phrases like:
“Results-driven professional”
“Excellent communication skills”
“Team player”
“Highly motivated”
Without evidence, these statements add almost no value.
Strong APS pitches align tightly with:
Required capabilities
Key responsibilities
Agency priorities
Role expectations
Weak pitches stay too broad.
Tailoring does not mean copying keywords from the job ad.
Strong tailoring means:
Matching examples to the role level
Demonstrating relevant complexity
Reflecting similar stakeholder environments
Showing aligned capability evidence
Addressing operational or strategic priorities
For example:
APS4 roles usually prioritise administration, customer service, procedural accuracy, and coordination
APS6 roles assess judgement, leadership influence, and complex stakeholder management
EL roles assess strategic oversight and organisational leadership
Your examples should reflect the seniority level being assessed.
Experienced APS recruiters and panel members often decide within the first few paragraphs whether a pitch is competitive.
They look for:
Clear structure
Relevant evidence
Capability alignment
Communication quality
Outcome-focused writing
Role relevance
They also notice:
Poor grammar
Overly long paragraphs
Generic writing
Excessive jargon
Lack of specificity
Weak examples
One major issue is applicants trying to sound overly formal or “government-like”. This often produces robotic writing that lacks clarity.
Strong APS pitches sound:
Professional
Direct
Evidence-based
Human
Clear
Yes, but indirectly.
The strongest APS pitches naturally incorporate:
Situation
Task
Action
Result
Without sounding formulaic.
Weak STAR responses often feel:
Overly rigid
Too long
Artificially structured
Good APS writing integrates STAR naturally into concise achievement-focused examples.
Always follow the application instructions exactly.
However, generally:
One-page pitches should be concise and highly selective
500-word pitches require prioritised examples
750 to 1000-word pitches allow more capability depth
Executive-level pitches usually require more strategic context
One of the biggest mistakes is using all available word count without adding value.
APS panels prefer:
Clarity
Relevance
Strong examples
Efficient communication
Not unnecessary length.
Strong APS pitches naturally incorporate relevant terminology such as:
Stakeholder engagement
Governance
Policy implementation
Program delivery
Compliance
Operational outcomes
Risk management
Strategic priorities
Briefings
Cross-functional collaboration
Public sector outcomes
Process improvement
Evidence-based decision-making
However, keyword stuffing weakens credibility quickly.
The language must feel natural and connected to real examples.
The best APS pitches are not written like marketing documents.
They are written like evidence.
The strongest candidates:
Focus on outcomes
Match capability expectations
Use relevant examples
Demonstrate judgement
Show communication clarity
Align closely with the role level
Most unsuccessful APS applications fail because they stay too generic.
The candidates who consistently secure interviews understand one thing clearly:
APS recruitment is fundamentally evidence-based.
If your pitch demonstrates capability through relevant examples and measurable outcomes, you immediately separate yourself from the majority of applicants.
Upload Resume
Import from Linkedin